Apr 7, 2025

Breach in Company Relationships – Sanctions and Liability for Damages

Breach and Sanctions in Corporate Relationships: Legal Instruments and Consequences
Breach and Sanctions in Corporate Relationships: Legal Instruments and Consequences
Breach and Sanctions in Corporate Relationships: Legal Instruments and Consequences

Default in corporate relationships can arise in various relations and trigger different sanctions. While the general principles of contract law provide a theoretical starting point, corporate law has developed specific rules that take into account the unique party constellations and interests present in companies. This article reviews the central rules on breach, sanctions, and liability in corporate relationships, with a particular focus on the practical remedies available to the parties involved.

The scope of default rules in corporate relationships

Party relations and duty basis

Breach in corporate law can occur in three main relationships:

  1. Between the company and the company's fiduciaries

  2. Between the company and the individual participant

  3. Between the participants

Unlike ordinary contractual relationships, corporate relationships are characterized by complex party constellations where multiple interests must be balanced. The obligations that can be breached vary depending on the form of company, the number of participants, and the content of the articles of association or partnership agreement.

Typical breach situations

In general partnerships, breaches typically occur in the relationships between participants, for example, in cases of cooperation problems or breaches of loyalty obligations such as non-compete clauses.

In limited liability companies, issues of breach arise both in the relationships between shareholders and between the company and its shareholders. Examples of the latter may include:

  • Failure to pay share contributions

  • Violation of distribution limitations

  • Abuse of power by majority shareholders

Sanctions for breaches in corporate relationships

Exclusion and removal in general partnerships

In general partnerships, exclusion and removal are key sanctions for breach. A participant can demand to be removed immediately when:

  • The participant's rights have been violated by a significant breach of the corporate relationship

  • Removal is justified by substantial reasons of fairness

  • The participant is outvoted in a significant decision (assuming majority vote is agreed upon)

The company or participants can, on the other hand, demand the exclusion of a participant when:

  • The participant has significantly violated the corporate relationship through breach

  • Compelling reasons justify exclusion

  • Bankruptcy or public composition proceedings have been initiated against the participant's estate, or the participant is unable to fulfill their obligations

Redemption in limited companies

In limited liability companies, redemption is the most relevant sanction for breach. A shareholder can demand redemption when there are "compelling reasons" for the shareholder to be given the right to exit the company, cf. the Companies Act § 4-24.

The company can, on the other hand, demand redemption when:

  • The shareholder has significantly violated the corporate relationship through breach

  • A serious and lasting conflict has arisen between the shareholder and other shareholders

In calculating the redemption amount, the "real value" of the share is determined at the time the demand is made. The Supreme Court has clarified that the term "real value" must be interpreted in light of the considerations behind the individual redemption provision. In redemption after abuse of power, the calculation should be linked to the underlying values of the company (Bergshav Holding case), while in redemption following denial of consent, market value may be more relevant (Flesberg case).

Dissolution of the company

Dissolution is the most drastic sanction and is reserved for particularly serious cases.

In limited liability companies, a shareholder can demand the company be dissolved by court order when a corporate body or others representing the company have acted contrary to the rules against abuse of power and "particularly compelling reasons" justify dissolution, cf. the Companies Act § 16-19.

In general partnerships, a participant can demand immediate dissolution of the company when:

  • The participant's rights have been violated by a significant breach

  • Reference to withdrawal would not be reasonable

  • Compelling reasons otherwise justify dissolution

Rescission - a rarely applicable sanction

Rescission, a central sanction in contract law, has limited practical application in corporate law. Particularly, rescission of share subscriptions is generally excluded after the share capital is registered with the Norwegian Register of Business Enterprises. This is due to the consideration for creditors, who may have based their lending on the notoriety that enterprise registration provides.

Invalidity and similar objections

Invalidity in share subscription

The ability to invoke invalidity or similar objections is severely limited in corporate law. Once share capital is registered in the Norwegian Register of Business Enterprises, a subscriber cannot generally invoke invalidity or frustrating conditions to recover their contribution, cf. the Companies Act § 2-10.

Exceptions apply for the severe grounds of invalidity:

  • Forgery

  • Fraud

  • Severe coercion

  • Lack of legal capacity

Contract law's minor grounds for invalidity do not prevail after the registration date. The reasoning is the consideration for creditors and the trust in the registered share capital.

Invalid general meeting resolutions

General meeting resolutions can be invalid if the general meeting has acted contrary to:

  • Their substantive competence

  • The Companies Act or the company's articles of association

  • Their personal competence

In the case of procedural errors, invalidity only results if the error may have influenced the content of the resolution. Significant violation of the notice rules always leads to invalidity.

Lawsuits concerning invalidity must generally be filed within three months after the decision was made, cf. the Companies Act § 5-23.

Liability in corporate relationships

Claims for damages from the company

The Companies Act § 17-1 first paragraph authorizes the company to claim damages from the general manager, board member, member of the corporate assembly, auditor, or shareholder who has intentionally or negligently caused the company damage.

Board members and managers can be held liable for:

  • Illegal or bylaw-violating decisions

  • Exceeding authority

  • Violation of oversight and control duties

  • Lack of duty to act in case of loss of equity

Shareholders can be held liable for:

  • Voting for resolutions that are illegal or contrary to bylaws

  • Resolutions the shareholder understands or should understand will cause the company loss

Claims for damages from others than the company

The Companies Act § 17-1 first paragraph also supports claims from "shareholder or others" (typically the company's creditors) against the company's trusted persons. Such liability requires the tortfeasor to have acted negligently.

A particular issue is whether a shareholder can claim compensation for their share of the company's loss. The Supreme Court in the Skiltmaker case (Rt. 2004 p. 1816) has been skeptical of this, but the issue remains contested.

Contributory liability

The Companies Act § 17-1 second paragraph establishes contributory liability for those who intentionally or negligently contributed to causing damage. This can, for example, include:

  • Advisors who contribute to board members causing damage

  • Shareholders who influence trusted persons' damaging decisions

Conclusion

Breach in corporate relationships triggers specific sanctions tailored to the nature of corporate law. The most practical remedies are removal/exclusion in general partnerships, redemption in limited liability companies, and liability in both company forms. Dissolution is reserved for the most severe cases, while rescission has very limited practical significance. The rules balance the interests of the aggrieved party against the interests of the company's creditors, other participants, and continued operation.

Sterk Law Firm

Your Partner in Norwegian Corporate Law

Your Partner in Norwegian Corporate Law

Your Partner in Norwegian Corporate Law

The legal structure forms the framework for your business. The choice of structure, governance documents, and agreements will have significant impacts throughout the company's lifespan. Errors and deficiencies can lead to substantial consequences, both legally and financially. Therefore, it is crucial to have a competent business attorney by your side. At Sterk Law Firm, we have extensive experience advising companies and their owners. We are aware of the common pitfalls and know how to build a robust structure for the future. Whether you are establishing a new company, bringing in investors, executing a merger, or winding down operations, we can assist with tailored solutions. We see it as our duty to clarify what you can achieve and how various solutions will impact the company. Our advice is practical and business-oriented, with an eye for both legal and commercial aspects of the matter. We will be a sparring partner who challenges you when necessary, to ensure all possibilities are considered before a decision is made. As a permanent attorney, we can also assume the role of company secretary and become an integral part of the company's management. We assist with calling, minute-taking, and conducting general meetings and board meetings, as well as updating the share register and notifications to the Register of Business Enterprises. Most of our clients choose an ongoing advisory agreement so that we are available when the need arises. Others seek assistance for standalone transactions or projects. We tailor our offer to your needs and provide you with a predictable price based on a fixed hourly rate or unit price. Contact us today for a non-binding conversation!

The legal structure forms the framework for your business. The choice of structure, governance documents, and agreements will have significant impacts throughout the company's lifespan. Errors and deficiencies can lead to substantial consequences, both legally and financially. Therefore, it is crucial to have a competent business attorney by your side. At Sterk Law Firm, we have extensive experience advising companies and their owners. We are aware of the common pitfalls and know how to build a robust structure for the future. Whether you are establishing a new company, bringing in investors, executing a merger, or winding down operations, we can assist with tailored solutions. We see it as our duty to clarify what you can achieve and how various solutions will impact the company. Our advice is practical and business-oriented, with an eye for both legal and commercial aspects of the matter. We will be a sparring partner who challenges you when necessary, to ensure all possibilities are considered before a decision is made. As a permanent attorney, we can also assume the role of company secretary and become an integral part of the company's management. We assist with calling, minute-taking, and conducting general meetings and board meetings, as well as updating the share register and notifications to the Register of Business Enterprises. Most of our clients choose an ongoing advisory agreement so that we are available when the need arises. Others seek assistance for standalone transactions or projects. We tailor our offer to your needs and provide you with a predictable price based on a fixed hourly rate or unit price. Contact us today for a non-binding conversation!

The legal structure forms the framework for your business. The choice of structure, governance documents, and agreements will have significant impacts throughout the company's lifespan. Errors and deficiencies can lead to substantial consequences, both legally and financially. Therefore, it is crucial to have a competent business attorney by your side. At Sterk Law Firm, we have extensive experience advising companies and their owners. We are aware of the common pitfalls and know how to build a robust structure for the future. Whether you are establishing a new company, bringing in investors, executing a merger, or winding down operations, we can assist with tailored solutions. We see it as our duty to clarify what you can achieve and how various solutions will impact the company. Our advice is practical and business-oriented, with an eye for both legal and commercial aspects of the matter. We will be a sparring partner who challenges you when necessary, to ensure all possibilities are considered before a decision is made. As a permanent attorney, we can also assume the role of company secretary and become an integral part of the company's management. We assist with calling, minute-taking, and conducting general meetings and board meetings, as well as updating the share register and notifications to the Register of Business Enterprises. Most of our clients choose an ongoing advisory agreement so that we are available when the need arises. Others seek assistance for standalone transactions or projects. We tailor our offer to your needs and provide you with a predictable price based on a fixed hourly rate or unit price. Contact us today for a non-binding conversation!

Advokatfirmaet Sterk
Advokatfirmaet Sterk
Advokatfirmaet Sterk

We build strong corporate structures and safeguard your ownership interests

We build strong corporate structures and safeguard your ownership interests

We build strong corporate structures and safeguard your ownership interests

Explore

More articles

Tax implications of establishing a limited company and increasing share capital

Corporate Law

Apr 23, 2025

Tax implications of establishing a private limited company and increasing share capital

The establishment of a limited liability company and the increase of share capital have significant tax implications, particularly in the case of contributions in kind. For the shareholder, the contribution of assets is considered as a realization in exchange for shares, followed by a calculation of gains or losses. The value of the contribution usually becomes the shareholder's initial acquisition cost and is regarded as tax-deductible capital. For the company, contributions are not considered taxable income, and the company receives initial acquisition values corresponding to the market value of the contributed assets. The choice between issuing new shares or increasing the nominal value impacts the allowance base and the subsequent taxation of dividends and gains.

Tax implications of establishing a limited company and increasing share capital

Corporate Law

Apr 23, 2025

Tax implications of establishing a private limited company and increasing share capital

The establishment of a limited liability company and the increase of share capital have significant tax implications, particularly in the case of contributions in kind. For the shareholder, the contribution of assets is considered as a realization in exchange for shares, followed by a calculation of gains or losses. The value of the contribution usually becomes the shareholder's initial acquisition cost and is regarded as tax-deductible capital. For the company, contributions are not considered taxable income, and the company receives initial acquisition values corresponding to the market value of the contributed assets. The choice between issuing new shares or increasing the nominal value impacts the allowance base and the subsequent taxation of dividends and gains.

Tax implications of establishing a limited company and increasing share capital

Corporate Law

Apr 23, 2025

Tax implications of establishing a private limited company and increasing share capital

The establishment of a limited liability company and the increase of share capital have significant tax implications, particularly in the case of contributions in kind. For the shareholder, the contribution of assets is considered as a realization in exchange for shares, followed by a calculation of gains or losses. The value of the contribution usually becomes the shareholder's initial acquisition cost and is regarded as tax-deductible capital. For the company, contributions are not considered taxable income, and the company receives initial acquisition values corresponding to the market value of the contributed assets. The choice between issuing new shares or increasing the nominal value impacts the allowance base and the subsequent taxation of dividends and gains.

The Exemption Method in Norwegian Tax Law: Tax Exemption for Companies as Shareholders

Corporate Law

Apr 23, 2025

The Exemption Method: Tax Exemption for Companies in Norwegian Tax Law

The exemption method is a key scheme in Norwegian tax law that exempts companies from tax liability on dividends and share gains, intended to prevent chain taxation. The scheme encompasses both Norwegian and foreign companies, but with significant exceptions for income from companies in low-tax countries and portfolio investments outside the EEA. Even with the exemption method, companies must recognize three percent of received dividends as income, except for dividends within tax groups. The rules often require consideration of ownership interests, voting rights, and genuine establishment. RetryKA

The Exemption Method in Norwegian Tax Law: Tax Exemption for Companies as Shareholders

Corporate Law

Apr 23, 2025

The Exemption Method: Tax Exemption for Companies in Norwegian Tax Law

The exemption method is a key scheme in Norwegian tax law that exempts companies from tax liability on dividends and share gains, intended to prevent chain taxation. The scheme encompasses both Norwegian and foreign companies, but with significant exceptions for income from companies in low-tax countries and portfolio investments outside the EEA. Even with the exemption method, companies must recognize three percent of received dividends as income, except for dividends within tax groups. The rules often require consideration of ownership interests, voting rights, and genuine establishment. RetryKA

The Exemption Method in Norwegian Tax Law: Tax Exemption for Companies as Shareholders

Corporate Law

Apr 23, 2025

The Exemption Method: Tax Exemption for Companies in Norwegian Tax Law

The exemption method is a key scheme in Norwegian tax law that exempts companies from tax liability on dividends and share gains, intended to prevent chain taxation. The scheme encompasses both Norwegian and foreign companies, but with significant exceptions for income from companies in low-tax countries and portfolio investments outside the EEA. Even with the exemption method, companies must recognize three percent of received dividends as income, except for dividends within tax groups. The rules often require consideration of ownership interests, voting rights, and genuine establishment. RetryKA

Representation of Companies Outward: Authority, Credentials, and Binding Agreements

Corporate Law

Apr 8, 2025

Company Law: Competence, Authority, and Representation

The authority of company representatives to bind the company through agreements is governed by a dual set of rules. Internally, competence is limited by company law, the articles of association, and instructions, while externally, the authority is often broader. In limited liability companies, the board represents the company externally with unlimited signatory powers, while the managing director can bind the company in matters within the scope of daily management. Exceeding competence will generally not exempt the company from being bound if the counterparty acted in reasonable good faith. This protection of the counterparty is particularly strong for limited liability companies through the EU's Disclosure Directive. For general partnerships, the participants represent the company individually unless otherwise agreed, with similar authority rules as for limited liability companies. Good corporate governance presupposes clear division of competencies and open communication regarding the scope of representational rights.

Representation of Companies Outward: Authority, Credentials, and Binding Agreements

Corporate Law

Apr 8, 2025

Company Law: Competence, Authority, and Representation

The authority of company representatives to bind the company through agreements is governed by a dual set of rules. Internally, competence is limited by company law, the articles of association, and instructions, while externally, the authority is often broader. In limited liability companies, the board represents the company externally with unlimited signatory powers, while the managing director can bind the company in matters within the scope of daily management. Exceeding competence will generally not exempt the company from being bound if the counterparty acted in reasonable good faith. This protection of the counterparty is particularly strong for limited liability companies through the EU's Disclosure Directive. For general partnerships, the participants represent the company individually unless otherwise agreed, with similar authority rules as for limited liability companies. Good corporate governance presupposes clear division of competencies and open communication regarding the scope of representational rights.

Representation of Companies Outward: Authority, Credentials, and Binding Agreements

Corporate Law

Apr 8, 2025

Company Law: Competence, Authority, and Representation

The authority of company representatives to bind the company through agreements is governed by a dual set of rules. Internally, competence is limited by company law, the articles of association, and instructions, while externally, the authority is often broader. In limited liability companies, the board represents the company externally with unlimited signatory powers, while the managing director can bind the company in matters within the scope of daily management. Exceeding competence will generally not exempt the company from being bound if the counterparty acted in reasonable good faith. This protection of the counterparty is particularly strong for limited liability companies through the EU's Disclosure Directive. For general partnerships, the participants represent the company individually unless otherwise agreed, with similar authority rules as for limited liability companies. Good corporate governance presupposes clear division of competencies and open communication regarding the scope of representational rights.

Organization of a partnership: The role and authority of corporate bodies

Corporate Law

Apr 8, 2025

Organization of Partnerships – Function and Competence of Corporate Bodies

Responsible companies are characterized by a flexible organizational structure where the company meeting is the only mandatory body. The company meeting constitutes the highest authority of the company, and the basic principle is that all decisions require unanimity among the participants—a principle that directly corresponds with their unlimited and joint liability for company obligations. In companies without a board or managing director, each participant can perform actions that are a natural part of the ongoing operations. The company may also choose to have a board and managing director, who will then be responsible for the general management. The employees' right to representation is primarily safeguarded in the company meeting. The provisions of the Companies Act are largely flexible, allowing the organization of the company to be tailored according to the needs of the business and the desires of the participants.

Organization of a partnership: The role and authority of corporate bodies

Corporate Law

Apr 8, 2025

Organization of Partnerships – Function and Competence of Corporate Bodies

Responsible companies are characterized by a flexible organizational structure where the company meeting is the only mandatory body. The company meeting constitutes the highest authority of the company, and the basic principle is that all decisions require unanimity among the participants—a principle that directly corresponds with their unlimited and joint liability for company obligations. In companies without a board or managing director, each participant can perform actions that are a natural part of the ongoing operations. The company may also choose to have a board and managing director, who will then be responsible for the general management. The employees' right to representation is primarily safeguarded in the company meeting. The provisions of the Companies Act are largely flexible, allowing the organization of the company to be tailored according to the needs of the business and the desires of the participants.

Organization of a partnership: The role and authority of corporate bodies

Corporate Law

Apr 8, 2025

Organization of Partnerships – Function and Competence of Corporate Bodies

Responsible companies are characterized by a flexible organizational structure where the company meeting is the only mandatory body. The company meeting constitutes the highest authority of the company, and the basic principle is that all decisions require unanimity among the participants—a principle that directly corresponds with their unlimited and joint liability for company obligations. In companies without a board or managing director, each participant can perform actions that are a natural part of the ongoing operations. The company may also choose to have a board and managing director, who will then be responsible for the general management. The employees' right to representation is primarily safeguarded in the company meeting. The provisions of the Companies Act are largely flexible, allowing the organization of the company to be tailored according to the needs of the business and the desires of the participants.

Contact us

Contact Sterk Law Firm for legal assistance and advice. Our dedicated team of experienced lawyers is ready to find tailored solutions for your specific challenges.

Portrait of a man in a suit with arms crossed, in front of a graphic background – expressing professionalism and confidence
Portrait of a man in a suit with arms crossed, in front of a graphic background – expressing professionalism and confidence

By submitting this form, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.