Apr 8, 2025

Customer Clauses According to the Working Environment Act – Rules, Limitations, and Requirements

Customer Clauses in Employment Relationships: Legal Requirements and Limitations
Customer Clauses in Employment Relationships: Legal Requirements and Limitations
Customer Clauses in Employment Relationships: Legal Requirements and Limitations

Customer clauses are a type of non-compete agreement regulated by the Working Environment Act, Chapter 14 A. Unlike non-compete clauses, which can prevent an employee from working for competing businesses, customer clauses specifically restrict an employee's ability to contact former employer's customers after the employment has ended. This article provides a review of what defines a customer clause and the requirements for such clauses to be valid and enforceable.

Definition of Customer Clause

The Working Environment Act § 14 A-4 (1) defines a customer clause as an "agreement between an employer and employee that limits the employee's access to contact the employer's customers after the end of the employment relationship".

For an agreement to be considered a customer clause under the law, four criteria must be met:

  1. There must be an agreement between the employer and the employee

  2. The agreement must restrict the employee's freedom of action

  3. The restriction must apply to the employee's access to contact the employer's customers

  4. The agreement must apply after the employment has ended

It is important to note that the law only mentions the employee's access to "contact" the employer's customers. According to the preparatory works, it is not permitted to enter into agreements that prohibit the employee from serving the former employer's customers who take the initiative to contact the employee. Such an agreement would be unlawful.

Formal Requirements for Customer Clauses

Written Requirement

A customer clause is only valid if it is entered into in writing, cf. the Working Environment Act § 14 A-4 (2), with reference to § 14 A-1 (3). The purpose of the written requirement is to ensure the notarization of the agreement, to avoid any doubt about the existence and content of the agreement.

Time Limit

The Working Environment Act § 14 A-4 (2) second sentence establishes that a customer clause can be enforced for a maximum of one year from the termination of the employment. This is an absolute limit that cannot be derogated to the disadvantage of the employee.

Connection Requirement

Unlike non-compete clauses, which require the employer to have a "special need for protection against competition," there is no such limitation for customer clauses. Therefore, the starting point is that the employer is free to enforce a customer clause upon termination of the employment.

However, there is an important limitation in the Working Environment Act § 14 A-4 (3): The customer clause can only include customers with whom the employee has had "contact with" or "responsibility for" during the last twelve months before the employer's explanation (connection requirement).

"Contact With"

The alternative "contact with" covers situations where the employee has had direct contact with the customer, for example:

  • Discussions

  • Contract negotiations

  • Ongoing customer care

  • Follow-up of existing customer relationships

There are no strict requirements for the scope of contact, but it must be more than of a sporadic nature. Isolated attempts at sales, such as through a single phone call or email, are not in themselves sufficient.

"Responsibility For"

The alternative "responsibility for" targets employees with overarching responsibility for:

  • Individual customers

  • Customer portfolios

  • The company's customers in general

This includes employees who, by virtue of special authority or their position, can bind the employer through agreements with the customer. Under this alternative, there is no requirement that the employee must have had direct contact with the customer.

Employer's Duty of Explanation

The Working Environment Act § 14 A-4 (3) requires the employer to provide the employee with an explanation of whether and to what extent a customer clause will be enforced. The duty of explanation for customer clauses is largely similar to the duty of explanation for non-compete clauses.

An important difference, however, is the content of the explanation. For non-compete clauses, the explanation must indicate the circumstances constituting the "employer's special need for protection against competition". For customer clauses, the explanation must instead specify "which customers are covered by the clause".

Requirement for Specification

The purpose of the explanation is to ensure predictability for the parties. Therefore, each customer must be identified in the explanation, so it clearly states which customers the clause is intended to cover.

A general reference to an indeterminate group of customers or a formulation like "any customer the employee has had contact with or responsibility for in the last year" is not sufficient. The customers must be specifically identified.

Compensation for Customer Clauses

Unlike non-compete clauses, where the employer is obliged to compensate the employee during the quarantine period, there is no corresponding obligation to compensate for customer clauses. This is an important difference reflecting that customer clauses are generally less restrictive to the employee's earning opportunities after the end of employment.

Dismissal or Termination by Employer

The Working Environment Act § 14 A-1 (4) limits the employer's right to enforce a customer clause in cases where:

  • The employer dismisses the employee, unless the dismissal is justifiable due to the employee's circumstances

  • The employer has breached its obligations in the employment relationship, giving the employee reasonable grounds to terminate the employment

This provision also applies to customer clauses, cf. § 14 A-4 (2) with reference to § 14 A-1 (4).

Conclusion

Customer clauses are an important tool for employers looking to protect their customer relationships after an employee leaves. The Working Environment Act imposes strict requirements on such clauses to balance the employer's need for protection against the employee's need to utilize their skills and experience:

  1. Customer clauses must be in writing

  2. They can be enforced for a maximum of one year after the end of employment

  3. They can only cover customers the employee had contact with or responsibility for in the last twelve months

  4. The employer must provide a specific explanation of which customers are covered

  5. They cannot prevent the employee from serving customers who contact the employee on their own initiative

Sterk Law Firm

Your Partner for a Well-Functioning Workplace

Your Partner for a Well-Functioning Workplace

Your Partner for a Well-Functioning Workplace

Employment law challenges can be complex and time-consuming, whether you are a business leader or an employee. The consequences of incorrect handling can be significant, both in human and economic terms. Our lawyers have extensive experience from various aspects of working life and broad expertise in all areas of employment law. We can therefore offer precise advice and support throughout the process, allowing you to focus on your core business.

Employment law challenges can be complex and time-consuming, whether you are a business leader or an employee. The consequences of incorrect handling can be significant, both in human and economic terms. Our lawyers have extensive experience from various aspects of working life and broad expertise in all areas of employment law. We can therefore offer precise advice and support throughout the process, allowing you to focus on your core business.

Employment law challenges can be complex and time-consuming, whether you are a business leader or an employee. The consequences of incorrect handling can be significant, both in human and economic terms. Our lawyers have extensive experience from various aspects of working life and broad expertise in all areas of employment law. We can therefore offer precise advice and support throughout the process, allowing you to focus on your core business.

Advokatfirmaet Sterk
Advokatfirmaet Sterk
Advokatfirmaet Sterk

Comprehensive Employment Law Assistance

Comprehensive Employment Law Assistance

Comprehensive Employment Law Assistance

Explore

More articles

Invalidity and Compensation for Wrongful Termination of Employment in Norwegian Law

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Invalidity and compensation for unjust dismissal or termination. In blog posts, emphasize that it pertains to Norwegian law.

In cases of wrongful termination or unjust dismissal, the court shall generally rule that the termination is invalid, allowing the employee to continue in or be reinstated to their position. Even if the position has been filled by another, the employee is entitled to at least an equivalent position. In exceptional cases, the court may nonetheless decide that the employment relationship should end. Additionally, the employee may claim compensation for financial losses and reparation, where the assessment is based on a broad consideration of fairness with emphasis on the parties' conditions and other relevant circumstances.

Invalidity and Compensation for Wrongful Termination of Employment in Norwegian Law

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Invalidity and compensation for unjust dismissal or termination. In blog posts, emphasize that it pertains to Norwegian law.

In cases of wrongful termination or unjust dismissal, the court shall generally rule that the termination is invalid, allowing the employee to continue in or be reinstated to their position. Even if the position has been filled by another, the employee is entitled to at least an equivalent position. In exceptional cases, the court may nonetheless decide that the employment relationship should end. Additionally, the employee may claim compensation for financial losses and reparation, where the assessment is based on a broad consideration of fairness with emphasis on the parties' conditions and other relevant circumstances.

Invalidity and Compensation for Wrongful Termination of Employment in Norwegian Law

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Invalidity and compensation for unjust dismissal or termination. In blog posts, emphasize that it pertains to Norwegian law.

In cases of wrongful termination or unjust dismissal, the court shall generally rule that the termination is invalid, allowing the employee to continue in or be reinstated to their position. Even if the position has been filled by another, the employee is entitled to at least an equivalent position. In exceptional cases, the court may nonetheless decide that the employment relationship should end. Additionally, the employee may claim compensation for financial losses and reparation, where the assessment is based on a broad consideration of fairness with emphasis on the parties' conditions and other relevant circumstances.

Procedural rules for disputes concerning the termination of employment: Negotiations, deadlines, and the right to remain in position

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Employment Law: Disputes about Termination and Dismissal

In the event of a dispute concerning termination or dismissal, specific procedural rules apply. The employee has the right to request negotiations within two weeks, and the employer is obliged to conduct a negotiation meeting within two weeks of receiving the request. In the case of termination, the employee is entitled to remain in their position while the dispute is ongoing, but the employer can demand resignation if continuation is unreasonable. The deadline for filing a lawsuit to contest the legality of the termination is eight weeks, and six months for pure compensation claims. Formal errors in the termination result in the annulment of the lawsuit deadline.

Procedural rules for disputes concerning the termination of employment: Negotiations, deadlines, and the right to remain in position

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Employment Law: Disputes about Termination and Dismissal

In the event of a dispute concerning termination or dismissal, specific procedural rules apply. The employee has the right to request negotiations within two weeks, and the employer is obliged to conduct a negotiation meeting within two weeks of receiving the request. In the case of termination, the employee is entitled to remain in their position while the dispute is ongoing, but the employer can demand resignation if continuation is unreasonable. The deadline for filing a lawsuit to contest the legality of the termination is eight weeks, and six months for pure compensation claims. Formal errors in the termination result in the annulment of the lawsuit deadline.

Procedural rules for disputes concerning the termination of employment: Negotiations, deadlines, and the right to remain in position

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Employment Law: Disputes about Termination and Dismissal

In the event of a dispute concerning termination or dismissal, specific procedural rules apply. The employee has the right to request negotiations within two weeks, and the employer is obliged to conduct a negotiation meeting within two weeks of receiving the request. In the case of termination, the employee is entitled to remain in their position while the dispute is ongoing, but the employer can demand resignation if continuation is unreasonable. The deadline for filing a lawsuit to contest the legality of the termination is eight weeks, and six months for pure compensation claims. Formal errors in the termination result in the annulment of the lawsuit deadline.

The Employee's Right to Terminate the Employment Contract: Terms and Consequences

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Employee's Right to Terminate the Employment Contract – Conditions, Legal Effects, and Burden of Proof

The employee's right to termination involves the ability to immediately end the employment relationship due to the employer's substantial breach. This right is not codified in the Working Environment Act but derives from general contractual principles. Typical reasons for termination include non-payment of wages, harassment, or serious violations of safety regulations. The Supreme Court in the Stryn Pharmacy case has established that the threshold is high, particularly concerning psychosocial work environment issues. In the event of rightful termination, the employee may claim compensation for financial loss.

The Employee's Right to Terminate the Employment Contract: Terms and Consequences

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Employee's Right to Terminate the Employment Contract – Conditions, Legal Effects, and Burden of Proof

The employee's right to termination involves the ability to immediately end the employment relationship due to the employer's substantial breach. This right is not codified in the Working Environment Act but derives from general contractual principles. Typical reasons for termination include non-payment of wages, harassment, or serious violations of safety regulations. The Supreme Court in the Stryn Pharmacy case has established that the threshold is high, particularly concerning psychosocial work environment issues. In the event of rightful termination, the employee may claim compensation for financial loss.

The Employee's Right to Terminate the Employment Contract: Terms and Consequences

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Employee's Right to Terminate the Employment Contract – Conditions, Legal Effects, and Burden of Proof

The employee's right to termination involves the ability to immediately end the employment relationship due to the employer's substantial breach. This right is not codified in the Working Environment Act but derives from general contractual principles. Typical reasons for termination include non-payment of wages, harassment, or serious violations of safety regulations. The Supreme Court in the Stryn Pharmacy case has established that the threshold is high, particularly concerning psychosocial work environment issues. In the event of rightful termination, the employee may claim compensation for financial loss.

Dismissal in Employment Relationships: Legal Conditions and Overall Assessment

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Dismissal in Employment Relationships – Conditions, Process, and Case Law

Dismissal represents the employer's right to terminate the employment contract immediately in the event of gross misconduct or significant breach by the employee. The threshold is very high, and a thorough overall assessment is required, with emphasis placed on the seriousness of the act, the employee's fault, and the circumstances of the business. The dismissal must not appear as a disproportionate reaction, and case law shows that the employer's own handling of the situation often carries great weight. The procedural rules mainly correspond to the rules for termination.

Dismissal in Employment Relationships: Legal Conditions and Overall Assessment

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Dismissal in Employment Relationships – Conditions, Process, and Case Law

Dismissal represents the employer's right to terminate the employment contract immediately in the event of gross misconduct or significant breach by the employee. The threshold is very high, and a thorough overall assessment is required, with emphasis placed on the seriousness of the act, the employee's fault, and the circumstances of the business. The dismissal must not appear as a disproportionate reaction, and case law shows that the employer's own handling of the situation often carries great weight. The procedural rules mainly correspond to the rules for termination.

Dismissal in Employment Relationships: Legal Conditions and Overall Assessment

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Dismissal in Employment Relationships – Conditions, Process, and Case Law

Dismissal represents the employer's right to terminate the employment contract immediately in the event of gross misconduct or significant breach by the employee. The threshold is very high, and a thorough overall assessment is required, with emphasis placed on the seriousness of the act, the employee's fault, and the circumstances of the business. The dismissal must not appear as a disproportionate reaction, and case law shows that the employer's own handling of the situation often carries great weight. The procedural rules mainly correspond to the rules for termination.

Contact us

Contact Sterk Law Firm for legal assistance and advice. Our dedicated team of experienced lawyers is ready to find tailored solutions for your specific challenges.

Portrait of a man in a suit with arms crossed, in front of a graphic background – expressing professionalism and confidence
Portrait of a man in a suit with arms crossed, in front of a graphic background – expressing professionalism and confidence

By submitting this form, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.