Apr 8, 2025

Customer Clauses According to the Working Environment Act – Rules, Limitations, and Requirements

Customer Clauses in Employment Relationships: Legal Requirements and Limitations
Customer Clauses in Employment Relationships: Legal Requirements and Limitations
Customer Clauses in Employment Relationships: Legal Requirements and Limitations

Customer clauses are a type of non-compete agreement regulated by the Working Environment Act, Chapter 14 A. Unlike non-compete clauses, which can prevent an employee from working for competing businesses, customer clauses specifically restrict an employee's ability to contact former employer's customers after the employment has ended. This article provides a review of what defines a customer clause and the requirements for such clauses to be valid and enforceable.

Definition of Customer Clause

The Working Environment Act § 14 A-4 (1) defines a customer clause as an "agreement between an employer and employee that limits the employee's access to contact the employer's customers after the end of the employment relationship".

For an agreement to be considered a customer clause under the law, four criteria must be met:

  1. There must be an agreement between the employer and the employee

  2. The agreement must restrict the employee's freedom of action

  3. The restriction must apply to the employee's access to contact the employer's customers

  4. The agreement must apply after the employment has ended

It is important to note that the law only mentions the employee's access to "contact" the employer's customers. According to the preparatory works, it is not permitted to enter into agreements that prohibit the employee from serving the former employer's customers who take the initiative to contact the employee. Such an agreement would be unlawful.

Formal Requirements for Customer Clauses

Written Requirement

A customer clause is only valid if it is entered into in writing, cf. the Working Environment Act § 14 A-4 (2), with reference to § 14 A-1 (3). The purpose of the written requirement is to ensure the notarization of the agreement, to avoid any doubt about the existence and content of the agreement.

Time Limit

The Working Environment Act § 14 A-4 (2) second sentence establishes that a customer clause can be enforced for a maximum of one year from the termination of the employment. This is an absolute limit that cannot be derogated to the disadvantage of the employee.

Connection Requirement

Unlike non-compete clauses, which require the employer to have a "special need for protection against competition," there is no such limitation for customer clauses. Therefore, the starting point is that the employer is free to enforce a customer clause upon termination of the employment.

However, there is an important limitation in the Working Environment Act § 14 A-4 (3): The customer clause can only include customers with whom the employee has had "contact with" or "responsibility for" during the last twelve months before the employer's explanation (connection requirement).

"Contact With"

The alternative "contact with" covers situations where the employee has had direct contact with the customer, for example:

  • Discussions

  • Contract negotiations

  • Ongoing customer care

  • Follow-up of existing customer relationships

There are no strict requirements for the scope of contact, but it must be more than of a sporadic nature. Isolated attempts at sales, such as through a single phone call or email, are not in themselves sufficient.

"Responsibility For"

The alternative "responsibility for" targets employees with overarching responsibility for:

  • Individual customers

  • Customer portfolios

  • The company's customers in general

This includes employees who, by virtue of special authority or their position, can bind the employer through agreements with the customer. Under this alternative, there is no requirement that the employee must have had direct contact with the customer.

Employer's Duty of Explanation

The Working Environment Act § 14 A-4 (3) requires the employer to provide the employee with an explanation of whether and to what extent a customer clause will be enforced. The duty of explanation for customer clauses is largely similar to the duty of explanation for non-compete clauses.

An important difference, however, is the content of the explanation. For non-compete clauses, the explanation must indicate the circumstances constituting the "employer's special need for protection against competition". For customer clauses, the explanation must instead specify "which customers are covered by the clause".

Requirement for Specification

The purpose of the explanation is to ensure predictability for the parties. Therefore, each customer must be identified in the explanation, so it clearly states which customers the clause is intended to cover.

A general reference to an indeterminate group of customers or a formulation like "any customer the employee has had contact with or responsibility for in the last year" is not sufficient. The customers must be specifically identified.

Compensation for Customer Clauses

Unlike non-compete clauses, where the employer is obliged to compensate the employee during the quarantine period, there is no corresponding obligation to compensate for customer clauses. This is an important difference reflecting that customer clauses are generally less restrictive to the employee's earning opportunities after the end of employment.

Dismissal or Termination by Employer

The Working Environment Act § 14 A-1 (4) limits the employer's right to enforce a customer clause in cases where:

  • The employer dismisses the employee, unless the dismissal is justifiable due to the employee's circumstances

  • The employer has breached its obligations in the employment relationship, giving the employee reasonable grounds to terminate the employment

This provision also applies to customer clauses, cf. § 14 A-4 (2) with reference to § 14 A-1 (4).

Conclusion

Customer clauses are an important tool for employers looking to protect their customer relationships after an employee leaves. The Working Environment Act imposes strict requirements on such clauses to balance the employer's need for protection against the employee's need to utilize their skills and experience:

  1. Customer clauses must be in writing

  2. They can be enforced for a maximum of one year after the end of employment

  3. They can only cover customers the employee had contact with or responsibility for in the last twelve months

  4. The employer must provide a specific explanation of which customers are covered

  5. They cannot prevent the employee from serving customers who contact the employee on their own initiative

Sterk Law Firm

Your Partner for a Well-Functioning Workplace

Your Partner for a Well-Functioning Workplace

Your Partner for a Well-Functioning Workplace

Employment law challenges can be complex and time-consuming, whether you are a business leader or an employee. The consequences of incorrect handling can be significant, both in human and economic terms. Our lawyers have extensive experience from various aspects of working life and broad expertise in all areas of employment law. We can therefore offer precise advice and support throughout the process, allowing you to focus on your core business.

Employment law challenges can be complex and time-consuming, whether you are a business leader or an employee. The consequences of incorrect handling can be significant, both in human and economic terms. Our lawyers have extensive experience from various aspects of working life and broad expertise in all areas of employment law. We can therefore offer precise advice and support throughout the process, allowing you to focus on your core business.

Employment law challenges can be complex and time-consuming, whether you are a business leader or an employee. The consequences of incorrect handling can be significant, both in human and economic terms. Our lawyers have extensive experience from various aspects of working life and broad expertise in all areas of employment law. We can therefore offer precise advice and support throughout the process, allowing you to focus on your core business.

Advokatfirmaet Sterk
Advokatfirmaet Sterk
Advokatfirmaet Sterk

Comprehensive Employment Law Assistance

Comprehensive Employment Law Assistance

Comprehensive Employment Law Assistance

Explore

More articles

Disputes Regarding Termination - Rights and Process

Employment Law

Sep 16, 2025

Disputes Regarding the Legality of Dismissal - Employees' Rights and Employers' Risks During Downsizing

Disputes regarding the legality of dismissals provide employees with extensive rights that can result in significant costs for employers. The right to remain employed while the dispute is ongoing entails continued salary payments for months or years. Employees can demand negotiations within two weeks, and lawsuits must be filed within eight weeks. Employers may request resignation due to unreasonable circumstances, but the threshold is high for dismissals related to the company's circumstances. Unjust dismissals result in invalidity and compensation. The right of priority applies for one year after dismissal. Thorough case management and evaluation of severance packages can reduce the risk of disputes.

Disputes Regarding Termination - Rights and Process

Employment Law

Sep 16, 2025

Disputes Regarding the Legality of Dismissal - Employees' Rights and Employers' Risks During Downsizing

Disputes regarding the legality of dismissals provide employees with extensive rights that can result in significant costs for employers. The right to remain employed while the dispute is ongoing entails continued salary payments for months or years. Employees can demand negotiations within two weeks, and lawsuits must be filed within eight weeks. Employers may request resignation due to unreasonable circumstances, but the threshold is high for dismissals related to the company's circumstances. Unjust dismissals result in invalidity and compensation. The right of priority applies for one year after dismissal. Thorough case management and evaluation of severance packages can reduce the risk of disputes.

Disputes Regarding Termination - Rights and Process

Employment Law

Sep 16, 2025

Disputes Regarding the Legality of Dismissal - Employees' Rights and Employers' Risks During Downsizing

Disputes regarding the legality of dismissals provide employees with extensive rights that can result in significant costs for employers. The right to remain employed while the dispute is ongoing entails continued salary payments for months or years. Employees can demand negotiations within two weeks, and lawsuits must be filed within eight weeks. Employers may request resignation due to unreasonable circumstances, but the threshold is high for dismissals related to the company's circumstances. Unjust dismissals result in invalidity and compensation. The right of priority applies for one year after dismissal. Thorough case management and evaluation of severance packages can reduce the risk of disputes.

Case Handling in Downsizing - Comprehensive Guide

Employment Law

Sep 16, 2025

Case Management for Downsizing - Comprehensive Guidance and Process Guide for Businesses

Proper case handling during downsizing requires a systematic approach with documentation of the need for change, early discussions with union representatives, board endorsement, and individual meetings with affected employees. Mass layoffs trigger specific notification requirements to NAV. Procedural errors can result in invalid terminations and liability for damages. Termination letters must meet strict formal requirements and be delivered correctly. Thorough planning, involvement of union representatives, and legal advice are essential for a responsible execution. An extensive checklist ensures compliance with all requirements.

Case Handling in Downsizing - Comprehensive Guide

Employment Law

Sep 16, 2025

Case Management for Downsizing - Comprehensive Guidance and Process Guide for Businesses

Proper case handling during downsizing requires a systematic approach with documentation of the need for change, early discussions with union representatives, board endorsement, and individual meetings with affected employees. Mass layoffs trigger specific notification requirements to NAV. Procedural errors can result in invalid terminations and liability for damages. Termination letters must meet strict formal requirements and be delivered correctly. Thorough planning, involvement of union representatives, and legal advice are essential for a responsible execution. An extensive checklist ensures compliance with all requirements.

Case Handling in Downsizing - Comprehensive Guide

Employment Law

Sep 16, 2025

Case Management for Downsizing - Comprehensive Guidance and Process Guide for Businesses

Proper case handling during downsizing requires a systematic approach with documentation of the need for change, early discussions with union representatives, board endorsement, and individual meetings with affected employees. Mass layoffs trigger specific notification requirements to NAV. Procedural errors can result in invalid terminations and liability for damages. Termination letters must meet strict formal requirements and be delivered correctly. Thorough planning, involvement of union representatives, and legal advice are essential for a responsible execution. An extensive checklist ensures compliance with all requirements.

Reassignment and Termination of Employment - Legal Frameworks

Employment Law

Sep 16, 2025

Reassignment and Modification Termination - Alternatives to Dismissal during Organizational Changes

Reassignment and termination due to changes are important alternatives to regular termination during restructuring. Changes within the "essential nature" of the position can be implemented under management authority, while substantial changes require termination due to changes. The threshold for termination due to changes is lower than that for regular termination. Procedural requirements must be followed, including consultation meetings. This is particularly relevant for older employees with long seniority. Information, consultation, and involvement of union representatives are central to an appropriate process.

Reassignment and Termination of Employment - Legal Frameworks

Employment Law

Sep 16, 2025

Reassignment and Modification Termination - Alternatives to Dismissal during Organizational Changes

Reassignment and termination due to changes are important alternatives to regular termination during restructuring. Changes within the "essential nature" of the position can be implemented under management authority, while substantial changes require termination due to changes. The threshold for termination due to changes is lower than that for regular termination. Procedural requirements must be followed, including consultation meetings. This is particularly relevant for older employees with long seniority. Information, consultation, and involvement of union representatives are central to an appropriate process.

Reassignment and Termination of Employment - Legal Frameworks

Employment Law

Sep 16, 2025

Reassignment and Modification Termination - Alternatives to Dismissal during Organizational Changes

Reassignment and termination due to changes are important alternatives to regular termination during restructuring. Changes within the "essential nature" of the position can be implemented under management authority, while substantial changes require termination due to changes. The threshold for termination due to changes is lower than that for regular termination. Procedural requirements must be followed, including consultation meetings. This is particularly relevant for older employees with long seniority. Information, consultation, and involvement of union representatives are central to an appropriate process.

Balancing of Interests in Termination - Legal Framework

Employment Law

Sep 16, 2025

Balancing of Interests in Termination - Balancing the Needs of the Business and the Employee

The weighing of interests when it comes to termination requires a concrete balancing between the needs of the business and the individual situation of the employee. The provision functions as a safety valve and aims at extraordinary circumstances beyond normal inconveniences associated with termination. NAV's role as a safety net is included in the assessment. The Supreme Court's practice shows that it takes a lot for the balancing of interests to be decisive when downsizing is justified, especially when other suitable employment is offered. The obligation takes precedence over collective agreements concerning mere seniority.

Balancing of Interests in Termination - Legal Framework

Employment Law

Sep 16, 2025

Balancing of Interests in Termination - Balancing the Needs of the Business and the Employee

The weighing of interests when it comes to termination requires a concrete balancing between the needs of the business and the individual situation of the employee. The provision functions as a safety valve and aims at extraordinary circumstances beyond normal inconveniences associated with termination. NAV's role as a safety net is included in the assessment. The Supreme Court's practice shows that it takes a lot for the balancing of interests to be decisive when downsizing is justified, especially when other suitable employment is offered. The obligation takes precedence over collective agreements concerning mere seniority.

Balancing of Interests in Termination - Legal Framework

Employment Law

Sep 16, 2025

Balancing of Interests in Termination - Balancing the Needs of the Business and the Employee

The weighing of interests when it comes to termination requires a concrete balancing between the needs of the business and the individual situation of the employee. The provision functions as a safety valve and aims at extraordinary circumstances beyond normal inconveniences associated with termination. NAV's role as a safety net is included in the assessment. The Supreme Court's practice shows that it takes a lot for the balancing of interests to be decisive when downsizing is justified, especially when other suitable employment is offered. The obligation takes precedence over collective agreements concerning mere seniority.

Contact us

Contact Sterk Law Firm for legal assistance and advice. Our dedicated team of experienced lawyers is ready to find tailored solutions for your specific challenges.

Portrett av mann i dress med armene i kors, foran grafisk bakgrunn – uttrykker profesjonalitet og selvsikkerhet
Portrett av mann i dress med armene i kors, foran grafisk bakgrunn – uttrykker profesjonalitet og selvsikkerhet

By submitting this form, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.