Disputes Regarding Parental Responsibility – The Court's Assessments According to the Children Act

Parents initially have a great deal of freedom to make agreements regarding parental responsibility. They can freely agree on who will have parental responsibility and are also free to change both agreements and decisions if they wish and agree on this, cf. the Children Act § 63 first paragraph. When the parents cannot agree on who should have parental responsibility, or do not agree to change an existing agreement, either of them can bring the matter to court, cf. the Children Act § 56, cf. § 63 second paragraph.

The Best Interests of the Child as the Overarching Principle

A decision about who shall have parental responsibility should, according to the Children Act § 48, primarily be based on what is best for the child. This is the fundamental principle that the courts must always adhere to in such cases. The court can determine joint parental responsibility or that one of the parents will have the responsibility alone.

Joint Parental Responsibility or Sole Responsibility

The courts can establish joint parental responsibility even if one of the parents objects to the other having a share in it. This was first established in the Supreme Court's decision in Rt. 1994 p. 992, where the result was joint parental responsibility against the father's wishes. However, if one of the parents explicitly does not want to participate in parental responsibility, it can hardly be established as joint parental responsibility.

Distribution of Parental Responsibility

It must be assumed that the content of parental responsibility cannot be distributed or limited by the courts. This was clarified by the Supreme Court in Rt. 2000 p. 185, where a majority of 3-2 determined that it was not permissible to make restrictions on the content of parental responsibility. The case involved a former cohabiting couple where the Court of Appeal had determined joint parental responsibility, but with the restriction that the father could not oppose the mother's move to Germany with the children. The Supreme Court's majority concluded that such a restriction was not permissible.

However, with an amendment from September 4, 2015, the competence of the courts was expanded, allowing the courts to now address issues of relocation with the child abroad. According to the Children Act § 56 third sentence, a parent with parental responsibility, or a parent who simultaneously claims a share in parental responsibility, can file a lawsuit concerning relocation with the child abroad. This means that the court can decide that a parent may move abroad with the child, without depriving the other parent of parental responsibility.

Assessment Standard for Joint Parental Responsibility

In the preparatory work to the Children Act, strong guidelines are provided for the courts' assessment. It is emphasized that if there are no circumstances affecting the person who wishes to share parental responsibility that make them unsuitable to exercise it, the request for joint parental responsibility should normally be granted. This especially applies where the parties have lived together, and the one seeking parental responsibility has participated in the care and has a close relationship with the child.

The parliamentary committee further reinforced this view by stressing that it is not reasonable for one parent to have sole parental responsibility simply because they wish the other parent not to have it.

Different Starting Points at Relationship Breakdown and When Parents Have Never Lived Together

Through the practice of the Supreme Court, different assessment standards are established depending on the parents' previous relationship situation:

  1. In the Event of a Relationship Breakdown: In Rt. 2003 p. 35, the Supreme Court stated that in the event of a relationship breakdown, the rule is joint parental responsibility unless special reasons suggest one parent should have sole parental responsibility. A mother or father will not get parental responsibility alone just because they oppose joint parental responsibility.

  2. When Parents Have Never Lived Together: In Rt. 2011 p. 1572, the Supreme Court clarified that when parents have never lived together, or have not lived together during the child's life, an overall assessment of what is in the best interest of the child is made without starting from a rule of joint parental responsibility. This was also taken as a basis in Rt. 2010 p. 216.

Factors in the Courts' Assessment

In the specific assessment, the courts consider several factors, including:

  1. If there is a high level of conflict between the parents making cooperation difficult

  2. The child's particular vulnerability or needs

  3. The parents' ability to cooperate for the child's best interests

  4. The degree of contact and connection between the child and the one claiming parental responsibility

  5. The extent of visitation and whether this provides a basis for meaningful exercise of parental responsibility

Parental Responsibility After Death

In disputes over parental responsibility after death, the Children Act § 64 applies. In such cases, the court should emphasize whether the surviving parent wishes to have parental responsibility. Furthermore, the wishes of the deceased should be considered, especially if they are written.

In Rt. 2011 p. 1439, the Supreme Court stated that biological connection should be emphasized, but this is only one of several factors in the concrete overall assessment of the child's best interests. If there is doubt about which solution is best for the child, the surviving parent should receive parental responsibility. However, the consideration of biological connection must yield if other circumstances collectively suggest that the child would be better off if others took over parental responsibility.

Conclusion

The courts' handling of disputes over parental responsibility is grounded in the principle of the best interests of the child. The assessment is complex and based on the specific circumstances of each case. Depending on whether the parents have previously lived together or not, the courts apply different approaches, but always with the child's interests and needs as the central focus of the assessment.

Sterk Law Firm

Reliable and Experienced Legal Assistance in Family and Child Law in Norway

Reliable and Experienced Legal Assistance in Family and Child Law in Norway

Reliable and Experienced Legal Assistance in Family and Child Law in Norway

Family and child law are areas of law that directly intervene in private life. They may involve the formation or dissolution of marriages, economic relations between spouses and cohabitants, the allocation of parental responsibility, or child protection cases. Common to all these situations is that they are very personal and can be challenging to handle alone. At Sterk Law Firm, you will receive the support of a dedicated attorney who thoroughly examines your situation. We listen to your desires and needs, offering clear guidance on how you should proceed. Our goal is always to arrive at amicable solutions whenever possible, especially in cases involving children. When situations escalate, we are prepared to uphold your interests with authority.

Family and child law are areas of law that directly intervene in private life. They may involve the formation or dissolution of marriages, economic relations between spouses and cohabitants, the allocation of parental responsibility, or child protection cases. Common to all these situations is that they are very personal and can be challenging to handle alone. At Sterk Law Firm, you will receive the support of a dedicated attorney who thoroughly examines your situation. We listen to your desires and needs, offering clear guidance on how you should proceed. Our goal is always to arrive at amicable solutions whenever possible, especially in cases involving children. When situations escalate, we are prepared to uphold your interests with authority.

Family and child law are areas of law that directly intervene in private life. They may involve the formation or dissolution of marriages, economic relations between spouses and cohabitants, the allocation of parental responsibility, or child protection cases. Common to all these situations is that they are very personal and can be challenging to handle alone. At Sterk Law Firm, you will receive the support of a dedicated attorney who thoroughly examines your situation. We listen to your desires and needs, offering clear guidance on how you should proceed. Our goal is always to arrive at amicable solutions whenever possible, especially in cases involving children. When situations escalate, we are prepared to uphold your interests with authority.

Advokatfirmaet Sterk
Advokatfirmaet Sterk
Advokatfirmaet Sterk

We safeguard the best interests of the children and the rights of the family.

We safeguard the best interests of the children and the rights of the family.

We safeguard the best interests of the children and the rights of the family.

Explore

More articles

Visitation rights in the event of a custody transfer

Family and Children

Apr 7, 2025

Contact rights after care takeover – legal frameworks and the best interest of the child

When child welfare services assume custody of a child, important questions arise regarding contact between the child and the parents. Visitation rights represent a complex legal area that balances the child's right to protection against the inviolability of family ties. This article explores the legal foundation for visitation rights, rooted in both Norwegian child welfare law and international human rights conventions. We examine how visitation is determined concretely in each case, without standard norms, and how the goal of reunification influences the extent of visitation. The article also highlights when visitation can be significantly limited or denied, the conditions for supervision during visitation, and the right to contact with siblings and other close relatives. Through rulings from the Supreme Court and the European Court of Human Rights, Norwegian practice has undergone significant changes in recent years—from template-based solutions to individualized assessments that better address the situation and needs of each individual child.

Visitation rights in the event of a custody transfer

Family and Children

Apr 7, 2025

Contact rights after care takeover – legal frameworks and the best interest of the child

When child welfare services assume custody of a child, important questions arise regarding contact between the child and the parents. Visitation rights represent a complex legal area that balances the child's right to protection against the inviolability of family ties. This article explores the legal foundation for visitation rights, rooted in both Norwegian child welfare law and international human rights conventions. We examine how visitation is determined concretely in each case, without standard norms, and how the goal of reunification influences the extent of visitation. The article also highlights when visitation can be significantly limited or denied, the conditions for supervision during visitation, and the right to contact with siblings and other close relatives. Through rulings from the Supreme Court and the European Court of Human Rights, Norwegian practice has undergone significant changes in recent years—from template-based solutions to individualized assessments that better address the situation and needs of each individual child.

Visitation rights in the event of a custody transfer

Family and Children

Apr 7, 2025

Contact rights after care takeover – legal frameworks and the best interest of the child

When child welfare services assume custody of a child, important questions arise regarding contact between the child and the parents. Visitation rights represent a complex legal area that balances the child's right to protection against the inviolability of family ties. This article explores the legal foundation for visitation rights, rooted in both Norwegian child welfare law and international human rights conventions. We examine how visitation is determined concretely in each case, without standard norms, and how the goal of reunification influences the extent of visitation. The article also highlights when visitation can be significantly limited or denied, the conditions for supervision during visitation, and the right to contact with siblings and other close relatives. Through rulings from the Supreme Court and the European Court of Human Rights, Norwegian practice has undergone significant changes in recent years—from template-based solutions to individualized assessments that better address the situation and needs of each individual child.

Child Custody Transfer - an Intervention with the Child's Best Interest in Mind

Family and Children

Apr 7, 2025

Care Takeover – Conditions, Implementation, and Rights under the Child Welfare Act. Please note that this blog post introduces Norwegian law.

When child welfare services assume custody of a child, it represents both an intervention in family life and a protection of the child's right to care. This article explores the legal conditions for the assumption of custody, what happens to the responsibility for the child, and when the child may move back home. From the requirement that "the situation must be relatively clearly unsustainable" to the goal of reunification with the family – here you gain insight into the legal framework designed to ensure the child's best interest in some of life's most challenging situations.

Child Custody Transfer - an Intervention with the Child's Best Interest in Mind

Family and Children

Apr 7, 2025

Care Takeover – Conditions, Implementation, and Rights under the Child Welfare Act. Please note that this blog post introduces Norwegian law.

When child welfare services assume custody of a child, it represents both an intervention in family life and a protection of the child's right to care. This article explores the legal conditions for the assumption of custody, what happens to the responsibility for the child, and when the child may move back home. From the requirement that "the situation must be relatively clearly unsustainable" to the goal of reunification with the family – here you gain insight into the legal framework designed to ensure the child's best interest in some of life's most challenging situations.

Child Custody Transfer - an Intervention with the Child's Best Interest in Mind

Family and Children

Apr 7, 2025

Care Takeover – Conditions, Implementation, and Rights under the Child Welfare Act. Please note that this blog post introduces Norwegian law.

When child welfare services assume custody of a child, it represents both an intervention in family life and a protection of the child's right to care. This article explores the legal conditions for the assumption of custody, what happens to the responsibility for the child, and when the child may move back home. From the requirement that "the situation must be relatively clearly unsustainable" to the goal of reunification with the family – here you gain insight into the legal framework designed to ensure the child's best interest in some of life's most challenging situations.

Child Welfare: Emergency Situations

Family and Children

Apr 7, 2025

Emergency Measures in Child Welfare – Custody Transfers and Interim Decisions

When children find themselves in situations that require immediate protection, child welfare authorities have several emergency measures at their disposal. The article reviews the four main types of emergency measures: immediate assistance when children lack care, emergency care orders when there is a risk of significant harm to the child, temporary relocation prohibition when moving may harm the child, and emergency placement in institutions for severe behavioral problems or human trafficking. Each measure has different conditions, decision-making authority, and duration. They represent a balance between the need for swift intervention and the consideration of legal rights, and their use has significantly decreased in recent years. In 2021, 694 children were placed in emergency care outside the home, most often due to parental substance abuse, mental illness, or suspicion of violence.

Child Welfare: Emergency Situations

Family and Children

Apr 7, 2025

Emergency Measures in Child Welfare – Custody Transfers and Interim Decisions

When children find themselves in situations that require immediate protection, child welfare authorities have several emergency measures at their disposal. The article reviews the four main types of emergency measures: immediate assistance when children lack care, emergency care orders when there is a risk of significant harm to the child, temporary relocation prohibition when moving may harm the child, and emergency placement in institutions for severe behavioral problems or human trafficking. Each measure has different conditions, decision-making authority, and duration. They represent a balance between the need for swift intervention and the consideration of legal rights, and their use has significantly decreased in recent years. In 2021, 694 children were placed in emergency care outside the home, most often due to parental substance abuse, mental illness, or suspicion of violence.

Child Welfare: Emergency Situations

Family and Children

Apr 7, 2025

Emergency Measures in Child Welfare – Custody Transfers and Interim Decisions

When children find themselves in situations that require immediate protection, child welfare authorities have several emergency measures at their disposal. The article reviews the four main types of emergency measures: immediate assistance when children lack care, emergency care orders when there is a risk of significant harm to the child, temporary relocation prohibition when moving may harm the child, and emergency placement in institutions for severe behavioral problems or human trafficking. Each measure has different conditions, decision-making authority, and duration. They represent a balance between the need for swift intervention and the consideration of legal rights, and their use has significantly decreased in recent years. In 2021, 694 children were placed in emergency care outside the home, most often due to parental substance abuse, mental illness, or suspicion of violence.

Child Welfare Services: Assistance Measures

Family and Children

Apr 7, 2025

Assistance Measures in Child Welfare – Voluntary and Mandatory Measures for Children and Families

Support measures constitute the bulk of child welfare services, accounting for nearly 83 percent of all initiated measures. The article reviews the various types of support measures that child welfare can offer, both voluntary and mandatory. Voluntary support measures at home are implemented when the child, due to their care situation or behavior, has a particular need for help. These measures can include a range from advice and guidance to financial support and respite care. In special cases, child welfare may also offer voluntary placement outside the home. In the absence of consent, the Child Welfare and Health Committee can impose support measures, including care-altering measures, daycare services, and control measures. Child welfare also has the authority to ensure necessary medical treatment and education for children with special needs, as well as to provide follow-up for youths over the age of 18.

Child Welfare Services: Assistance Measures

Family and Children

Apr 7, 2025

Assistance Measures in Child Welfare – Voluntary and Mandatory Measures for Children and Families

Support measures constitute the bulk of child welfare services, accounting for nearly 83 percent of all initiated measures. The article reviews the various types of support measures that child welfare can offer, both voluntary and mandatory. Voluntary support measures at home are implemented when the child, due to their care situation or behavior, has a particular need for help. These measures can include a range from advice and guidance to financial support and respite care. In special cases, child welfare may also offer voluntary placement outside the home. In the absence of consent, the Child Welfare and Health Committee can impose support measures, including care-altering measures, daycare services, and control measures. Child welfare also has the authority to ensure necessary medical treatment and education for children with special needs, as well as to provide follow-up for youths over the age of 18.

Child Welfare Services: Assistance Measures

Family and Children

Apr 7, 2025

Assistance Measures in Child Welfare – Voluntary and Mandatory Measures for Children and Families

Support measures constitute the bulk of child welfare services, accounting for nearly 83 percent of all initiated measures. The article reviews the various types of support measures that child welfare can offer, both voluntary and mandatory. Voluntary support measures at home are implemented when the child, due to their care situation or behavior, has a particular need for help. These measures can include a range from advice and guidance to financial support and respite care. In special cases, child welfare may also offer voluntary placement outside the home. In the absence of consent, the Child Welfare and Health Committee can impose support measures, including care-altering measures, daycare services, and control measures. Child welfare also has the authority to ensure necessary medical treatment and education for children with special needs, as well as to provide follow-up for youths over the age of 18.

Contact us

Contact Sterk Law Firm for legal assistance and advice. Our dedicated team of experienced lawyers is ready to find tailored solutions for your specific challenges.

Portrait of a man in a suit with arms crossed, in front of a graphic background – expressing professionalism and confidence
Portrait of a man in a suit with arms crossed, in front of a graphic background – expressing professionalism and confidence

By submitting this form, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.