Apr 16, 2025

Attempts in Norwegian Criminal Law - from Preparation to Execution

Attempts in Norwegian Criminal Law - from Preparation to Execution
Attempts in Norwegian Criminal Law - from Preparation to Execution
Attempts in Norwegian Criminal Law - from Preparation to Execution

Introduction: The Three Stages in Realizing a Criminal Intent

In Norwegian criminal law, there is a distinction between three stages in realizing a criminal intent:

  1. The Preparation That Is Free from Punishment

  2. The Punishable Attempt

  3. The Completed Crime

The general rule is that attempts at crimes are punishable but are punished more leniently than completed crimes (Penal Code §§ 49 and 51). However, attempts at misdemeanors are not punishable (§ 49, 2nd paragraph). For crimes, the boundary between attempt and completion primarily affects the severity of the penalty, while for misdemeanors, it is decisive for the punishability itself.

Penal Code § 49 defines an attempt as follows: "A Punishable Attempt occurs when a Crime is not completed, but an Act has been taken whereby its Execution was intended to be commenced." This definition marks the boundary both upwards towards the completed crime and downwards towards the preparation that is not punishable.

The Boundary Between Attempt and Completed Crime

The boundary between attempt and completed crime is, in principle, simple to draw: The crime is completed when all that is required by the specific penal provision is present. What is necessary depends on the description in the penal provision.

For example:

  • In provisions targeting the causation of a harmful result, the crime is not completed until the result has occurred as an adequate consequence of the act

  • In the case of danger crimes, it is required that a risk has occurred as an adequate consequence of the act

  • Where the penal provision describes the mode of action, the time of completion depends on the expressions used by the law

Some penal provisions are formulated such that the violation is completed already with an attempt, for example, § 98: "Whoever attempts to cause or contribute to changing the state constitution by unlawful means." In such cases, there is no question of distinguishing between attempt and completed violation.

The Boundary Between Attempt and Preparatory Action

The boundary between punishable attempt and preparation that is not punishable is more complicated. For an action to be considered a punishable attempt, the execution of the crime must be "intended to be commenced" according to § 49.

The decisive factor is whether the action, when viewed in context with the criminal activity and in light of all attendant circumstances, shows that the perpetrator is now directly moving towards a criminal goal. The perpetrator’s conduct must show that the time of preparations and considerations is over and that he is now proceeding to action.

This means that:

  1. There must be an intention of completion by the perpetrator

  2. The completion should, according to the perpetrator’s assumptions, occur in reasonably immediate connection with the action taken

Obtaining tools, making agreements with other participants, or conducting investigations at the scene are preparatory actions free from punishment. Also, a promise or offer to commit a crime is generally considered only as a preparatory action.

In assessing how far the perpetrator must have come to be punishable for an attempt, emphasis is placed on the psychological difference between the action already taken and the one remaining. The decisive factor is whether the action has reached a point where it is natural to say that the execution of the crime has begun.

Unserviceable Attempt

A particular question is whether the attempt must have resulted in an objective danger of a completed legal violation to be punishable, or whether the perpetrator’s subjective beliefs are entirely decisive. This concerns the issue of the so-called unserviceable attempt.

There is a distinction between:

  • Attempt using an unserviceable means (e.g., attempted murder with a substance that is actually harmless)

  • Attempt against an unserviceable object (e.g., attempted theft from an empty pocket)

In Norwegian law, it is clear that even unserviceable attempts are punishable. This follows from the Penal Code’s expression "intended to be commenced" in § 49, which establishes a subjective attempt principle. The decisive factor is not whether the action was objectively capable of completing the crime, but whether the perpetrator believed it was.

Examples from case law:

  • A man who tried to open a money box by hitting it with a roof tile was convicted of attempted aggravated theft even though the method was unserviceable (Rt. 1932 p. 1034)

  • A driver was convicted of attempted drunk driving even though the car was stuck in the gravel and could not drive (Rt. 1971 p. 416)

  • A person who kept and forwarded a package he believed contained drugs, but which actually contained caffeine, was convicted of attempted drug crime (Rt. 1993 p. 916)

Traditionally, acts resulting from pure superstition, such as attempting to take someone’s life through prayers or curses, are exempted from attempted punishment.

Preparatory Actions as Independent Crimes

Although preparatory actions are generally free from punishment, the legislature has in certain cases made such actions independent crimes (delictum sui generis). It is particularly preparatory actions that have a particularly dangerous character, and which also outwardly bear the mark of a criminal purpose, that are given such a special status.

Examples:

  • Entering into an agreement to commit certain serious crimes (§§ 94, 104, 147 a, 159, 162 c, 223, 225, 233 a and 269)

  • Acquiring firearms, explosives, or other means to commit crimes (e.g., §§ 161, 177 and 269 no. 2)

  • In the case of forgery, not only the use of forged documents (§ 183) but also the forgery itself (§ 185) and preparation for document forgery (§ 186) are separate crimes

Once an act is made an independent crime, it is judged in every way as any other crime, and there may be question of an attempt at this act.

Subjective Conditions for Attempt Punishment

For attempt punishment, intent is required. This is evident from the definition of an attempt in § 49, which uses the expression "intended to be commenced." Attempt at negligent crimes is not punishable.

The law does not require intent, only ordinary intention. The attempt and the completed crime are therefore identical on the subjective side; the difference lies in the objective.

The Penalty for Attempted Actions

Attempts must be punished more leniently than the completed crime (§ 51). This is not merely a discretion for the court but a mandate. This means that:

  1. The maximum penalty set by the penal provision for the crime cannot be applied to an attempted action

  2. A lesser penalty than would have been appropriate if the crime had been completed must be imposed

The law also allows for a reduction of the penalty below the usual minimum and to a milder type of punishment (§ 51, 1st paragraph, 2nd sentence).

In some cases, the legislature has determined that the attempt should be punished the same as the completed crime (e.g., § 100), or that it can be punished the same (§§ 148 and 151 a, 3rd paragraph).

Qualified Attempt

Often, an attempt at a crime is simultaneously a completed lesser crime (qualified attempt):

  • Attempted murder can be a completed bodily injury

  • Attempted rape can be a completed bodily offense and coercion

  • Attempted burglary theft can be a completed burglary

In these cases, there may be doubt whether one should convict for both the attempt and the lesser, completed crime, or whether one should suffice with conviction for the attempt. Case law is not consistent in this area. If there is only a conviction for attempt, the penalty cannot, in any case, be set below the minimum for the crime that is completed in connection with the attempt.

Comparison with Other Nordic Countries

The law of attempts shows significant differences between the Nordic countries:

  • Denmark goes far towards attempt punishment: Preparatory actions are also judged there as punishable attempt, and the law does not say, as with us, that attempts must be punished more leniently than completed crimes, only that it can happen

  • On the other hand, Sweden has no general rule of punishment for attempts; the attempt can only be punished where the specific penal provision expressly states it. Unserviceable attempt is usually punishable under Swedish law

Conclusion

The law of attempts in Norwegian criminal law balances between the consideration of the punishability of the criminal intent that has manifested in action and the consideration that the action has not led to the harm which the penal provision primarily seeks to prevent. The system with three stages - unpunishable preparation, punishable attempt, and completed crime - gives the courts the opportunity to nuance criminal responsibility according to how far the criminal plan has come in its realization.

Sterk Law Firm

Your Support in Criminal Cases

Your Support in Criminal Cases

Your Support in Criminal Cases

A criminal case can be one of life’s greatest challenges. The legal system is complex, and every decision can have significant consequences. As defense attorneys, we fight for your legal protection and future. As victim advocates, we ensure your voice is heard and your rights are upheld. Our attorneys have extensive experience on both sides of criminal law and provide you with reliable and competent assistance throughout the entire process.

A criminal case can be one of life’s greatest challenges. The legal system is complex, and every decision can have significant consequences. As defense attorneys, we fight for your legal protection and future. As victim advocates, we ensure your voice is heard and your rights are upheld. Our attorneys have extensive experience on both sides of criminal law and provide you with reliable and competent assistance throughout the entire process.

A criminal case can be one of life’s greatest challenges. The legal system is complex, and every decision can have significant consequences. As defense attorneys, we fight for your legal protection and future. As victim advocates, we ensure your voice is heard and your rights are upheld. Our attorneys have extensive experience on both sides of criminal law and provide you with reliable and competent assistance throughout the entire process.

Advokatfirmaet Sterk
Advokatfirmaet Sterk
Advokatfirmaet Sterk

Comprehensive legal assistance in criminal cases

Comprehensive legal assistance in criminal cases

Comprehensive legal assistance in criminal cases

Explore

More articles

Limitations in Criminal Law: When Time Erases Criminal Liability

Criminal Law

Apr 16, 2025

Limitations in Criminal Law: When Time Erases Criminal Liability

In criminal law, statute of limitations means that criminal liability ceases after a specific period. There are three forms: the limitation of the private right to prosecute, the limitation of the right to initiate a criminal case, and the limitation of the right to enforce an imposed sentence. The limitation periods for criminal cases range from 2 to 25 years depending on the statutory penalty range, while an imposed sentence becomes time-barred after 5 to 30 years. The limitation period is interrupted when the suspect is granted the status of an accused. The statute of limitations is justified by the diminishing reliability of evidence over time, the decreasing need for punishment, and the increasing consideration for the rehabilitation of the former offender.

Limitations in Criminal Law: When Time Erases Criminal Liability

Criminal Law

Apr 16, 2025

Limitations in Criminal Law: When Time Erases Criminal Liability

In criminal law, statute of limitations means that criminal liability ceases after a specific period. There are three forms: the limitation of the private right to prosecute, the limitation of the right to initiate a criminal case, and the limitation of the right to enforce an imposed sentence. The limitation periods for criminal cases range from 2 to 25 years depending on the statutory penalty range, while an imposed sentence becomes time-barred after 5 to 30 years. The limitation period is interrupted when the suspect is granted the status of an accused. The statute of limitations is justified by the diminishing reliability of evidence over time, the decreasing need for punishment, and the increasing consideration for the rehabilitation of the former offender.

Limitations in Criminal Law: When Time Erases Criminal Liability

Criminal Law

Apr 16, 2025

Limitations in Criminal Law: When Time Erases Criminal Liability

In criminal law, statute of limitations means that criminal liability ceases after a specific period. There are three forms: the limitation of the private right to prosecute, the limitation of the right to initiate a criminal case, and the limitation of the right to enforce an imposed sentence. The limitation periods for criminal cases range from 2 to 25 years depending on the statutory penalty range, while an imposed sentence becomes time-barred after 5 to 30 years. The limitation period is interrupted when the suspect is granted the status of an accused. The statute of limitations is justified by the diminishing reliability of evidence over time, the decreasing need for punishment, and the increasing consideration for the rehabilitation of the former offender.

Prosecution Rules in Norwegian Criminal Law: Public and Private Prosecution

Criminal Law

Apr 16, 2025

Prosecution Rules in Norwegian Criminal Law: Public and Private Prosecution

The prosecution rules in Norwegian criminal law determine who can initiate criminal proceedings and under what conditions. The general rule is unconditional public prosecution, but the victim's petition may be necessary for certain offenses. The prosecution rules are divided into three categories: unconditional public prosecution, conditional public prosecution (which may require the victim's petition, public interest, or both), and exclusively private prosecution (which no longer exists in the Criminal Code). The victim's petition for prosecution can be withdrawn before charges are filed, and the right to private prosecution is barred by limitation six months after the victim became aware of the offense and the perpetrator.

Prosecution Rules in Norwegian Criminal Law: Public and Private Prosecution

Criminal Law

Apr 16, 2025

Prosecution Rules in Norwegian Criminal Law: Public and Private Prosecution

The prosecution rules in Norwegian criminal law determine who can initiate criminal proceedings and under what conditions. The general rule is unconditional public prosecution, but the victim's petition may be necessary for certain offenses. The prosecution rules are divided into three categories: unconditional public prosecution, conditional public prosecution (which may require the victim's petition, public interest, or both), and exclusively private prosecution (which no longer exists in the Criminal Code). The victim's petition for prosecution can be withdrawn before charges are filed, and the right to private prosecution is barred by limitation six months after the victim became aware of the offense and the perpetrator.

Prosecution Rules in Norwegian Criminal Law: Public and Private Prosecution

Criminal Law

Apr 16, 2025

Prosecution Rules in Norwegian Criminal Law: Public and Private Prosecution

The prosecution rules in Norwegian criminal law determine who can initiate criminal proceedings and under what conditions. The general rule is unconditional public prosecution, but the victim's petition may be necessary for certain offenses. The prosecution rules are divided into three categories: unconditional public prosecution, conditional public prosecution (which may require the victim's petition, public interest, or both), and exclusively private prosecution (which no longer exists in the Criminal Code). The victim's petition for prosecution can be withdrawn before charges are filed, and the right to private prosecution is barred by limitation six months after the victim became aware of the offense and the perpetrator.

Confiscation in Norwegian Criminal Law: Purpose, Forms, and Application

Criminal Law

Apr 16, 2025

Confiscation in Norwegian Criminal Law: Purpose, Forms, and Application

Confiscation is a criminal legal reaction that provides the authority to deprive a person of money or objects associated with a criminal offense. Following the revision in 1973, confiscation is never considered a punishment, but it may have both punitive and preventive purposes. The main forms are the confiscation of proceeds (§34), extended confiscation (§34a), confiscation of objects associated with an offense (§35), and confiscation of dangerous objects (§37b). Confiscation of proceeds is generally mandatory, while the other forms are optional. Confiscation is conducted in favor of the state treasury but can also be used to cover a victim's compensation claim.

Confiscation in Norwegian Criminal Law: Purpose, Forms, and Application

Criminal Law

Apr 16, 2025

Confiscation in Norwegian Criminal Law: Purpose, Forms, and Application

Confiscation is a criminal legal reaction that provides the authority to deprive a person of money or objects associated with a criminal offense. Following the revision in 1973, confiscation is never considered a punishment, but it may have both punitive and preventive purposes. The main forms are the confiscation of proceeds (§34), extended confiscation (§34a), confiscation of objects associated with an offense (§35), and confiscation of dangerous objects (§37b). Confiscation of proceeds is generally mandatory, while the other forms are optional. Confiscation is conducted in favor of the state treasury but can also be used to cover a victim's compensation claim.

Confiscation in Norwegian Criminal Law: Purpose, Forms, and Application

Criminal Law

Apr 16, 2025

Confiscation in Norwegian Criminal Law: Purpose, Forms, and Application

Confiscation is a criminal legal reaction that provides the authority to deprive a person of money or objects associated with a criminal offense. Following the revision in 1973, confiscation is never considered a punishment, but it may have both punitive and preventive purposes. The main forms are the confiscation of proceeds (§34), extended confiscation (§34a), confiscation of objects associated with an offense (§35), and confiscation of dangerous objects (§37b). Confiscation of proceeds is generally mandatory, while the other forms are optional. Confiscation is conducted in favor of the state treasury but can also be used to cover a victim's compensation claim.

Preventive Detention and Special Sanctions in Norwegian Criminal Law: Public Protection Against Dangerous Offenders

Criminal Law

Apr 16, 2025

Preventive Detention and Special Sanctions in Norwegian Criminal Law: Public Protection Against Dangerous Offenders

Preventive detention is a special measure in Norwegian criminal law that may be imposed on accountable offenders when ordinary imprisonment is not considered sufficient to protect society. This measure is applied in cases of serious violence, sexual offenses, and deprivation of liberty offenses where there is an imminent risk of repetition. The preventive detention sentence sets a time frame (usually up to 15 years) and often a minimum period, but it can be extended if the threat persists. For offenders deemed non-accountable, there are special measures such as compulsory mental health care and compulsory care. These indefinite measures have replaced the earlier security detention system and safeguard society against particularly dangerous offenders.

Preventive Detention and Special Sanctions in Norwegian Criminal Law: Public Protection Against Dangerous Offenders

Criminal Law

Apr 16, 2025

Preventive Detention and Special Sanctions in Norwegian Criminal Law: Public Protection Against Dangerous Offenders

Preventive detention is a special measure in Norwegian criminal law that may be imposed on accountable offenders when ordinary imprisonment is not considered sufficient to protect society. This measure is applied in cases of serious violence, sexual offenses, and deprivation of liberty offenses where there is an imminent risk of repetition. The preventive detention sentence sets a time frame (usually up to 15 years) and often a minimum period, but it can be extended if the threat persists. For offenders deemed non-accountable, there are special measures such as compulsory mental health care and compulsory care. These indefinite measures have replaced the earlier security detention system and safeguard society against particularly dangerous offenders.

Preventive Detention and Special Sanctions in Norwegian Criminal Law: Public Protection Against Dangerous Offenders

Criminal Law

Apr 16, 2025

Preventive Detention and Special Sanctions in Norwegian Criminal Law: Public Protection Against Dangerous Offenders

Preventive detention is a special measure in Norwegian criminal law that may be imposed on accountable offenders when ordinary imprisonment is not considered sufficient to protect society. This measure is applied in cases of serious violence, sexual offenses, and deprivation of liberty offenses where there is an imminent risk of repetition. The preventive detention sentence sets a time frame (usually up to 15 years) and often a minimum period, but it can be extended if the threat persists. For offenders deemed non-accountable, there are special measures such as compulsory mental health care and compulsory care. These indefinite measures have replaced the earlier security detention system and safeguard society against particularly dangerous offenders.

Contact us

Contact Sterk Law Firm for legal assistance and advice. Our dedicated team of experienced lawyers is ready to find tailored solutions for your specific challenges.

Portrait of a man in a suit with arms crossed, in front of a graphic background – expressing professionalism and confidence
Portrait of a man in a suit with arms crossed, in front of a graphic background – expressing professionalism and confidence

By submitting this form, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.