Apr 15, 2025

Lack of Competence in Norwegian Contract Law: On Incapacity and Mental Disorders as Grounds for Invalidity

Lack of Competence in Norwegian Contract Law: On Incapacity and Mental Disorders as Grounds for Invalidity
Lack of Competence in Norwegian Contract Law: On Incapacity and Mental Disorders as Grounds for Invalidity
Lack of Competence in Norwegian Contract Law: On Incapacity and Mental Disorders as Grounds for Invalidity

In Norwegian contract law, the starting point is that any person with legal capacity can enter into binding agreements. However, the legal system has developed rules that protect individuals who do not have sufficient ability to safeguard their interests when entering into agreements. These rules are referred to as incapacity defects and constitute significant grounds for invalidity in contract law. This article addresses the two main categories: minority and mental disorder as grounds for invalidity.

Minority as a Ground for Invalidity

Who is Under Guardianship?

Under the Guardianship Act of 2010, the term "persons under guardianship" includes both:

  • Minors (persons under 18 years of age)

  • Adults who are placed under guardianship

For minors, the guardian is the person(s) with parental responsibility according to the Child Act. For adults under guardianship, a guardian is appointed in accordance with Chapter 4 of the Guardianship Act.

Legal Capacity and the Scope of Guardianship

The basic premise in the Guardianship Act is that an adult placed under guardianship retains their legal capacity. However, guardianship can, if the strict conditions of the law are met, entail a complete or partial removal of that legal capacity.

For an adult to be placed under guardianship with the removal of legal capacity, the following conditions must be met:

  • The person is unable to safeguard their own interests

  • The cause must be mental disorder, dementia, severe gambling addiction, or severely impaired health

  • There must be a need for guardianship

Division of Responsibilities Between Guardian and County Governor

It is the guardian and the county governor (local guardianship authority) who have the competence to enter into agreements on behalf of the person under guardianship. The main points are:

  • The county governor manages capital

  • The guardian is responsible for entering into agreements related to daily life

Minority as a Strong Ground for Invalidity

The main rule is that a person under guardianship cannot bind themselves to agreements or dispose of their assets. This is stipulated by Section 9 of the Guardianship Act for minors and Section 23 for adults who have been deprived of legal capacity.

Minority is a strong ground for invalidity. This means that the good faith of the contracting party does not protect against invalidity – the agreement becomes invalid even if the contracting party neither knew nor ought to have known of the minority.

An important exception to the main rule of strong invalidity is that the minor is considered authorized to dispose of cash they have in their possession. The condition for the contracting party to acquire rights in such cases is that there is no basis for criticism against them.

Exceptions to the Main Rule of Minority

The Guardianship Act contains several important exceptions from the principle that minors cannot enter into agreements on their own:

  1. Self-acquisition: A minor may generally dispose of assets earned through their own work after reaching the age of 15 or assets given for their own use.

  2. Employment Contracts: A minor over 15 years of age can enter into employment contracts themselves. The guardian cannot enter into employment contracts on behalf of the minor.

  3. Own Household: A minor with their own household can make arrangements common in a household, except for entering into a lease agreement for housing.

  4. Business Activity: A minor who is 15 years of age can, with the guardian's and county governor's permission, conduct certain business activities independently.

Similar rules apply to adults who have been deprived of legal capacity.

Legal Effects of Invalidity and Approval

For an invalid agreement, the following rules apply:

  • Both the minor and the contracting party have an unconditional obligation to return what they have received

  • Upon destruction of received performance, the contracting party is fully liable for compensation

  • The minor is only obliged to compensate to the extent that the performance has benefited them

This settlement is more favorable for the minor and less favorable for the contracting party compared to other invalidity rules.

A disposition that is initially invalid can be approved (ratified) by the guardian, the county governor, or the minor themselves when they become an adult. An approved disposition is effective from the time it was made.

The right to unilateral approval does not apply to a contracting party who was reasonably in good faith at the time of entering into the agreement. The contracting party can declare themselves unbound in such cases unless the agreement has already been fulfilled with binding effect for the minor.

Mental Disorder as a Ground for Invalidity

The Main Rule and Its Justification

It is an unwritten principle in Norwegian law that a person with a severe mental disorder or profound intellectual disability is not bound by their legal acts if these are motivated by the mental disorder.

A person with a mental disorder is not automatically considered a minor or under guardianship. The rules on mental disorder as a ground for invalidity, therefore, primarily apply when the person is not under guardianship but can also complement the rules on minority.

Today, the rule is justified by the need to protect individuals with severe mental disorders or profound intellectual disabilities from themselves.

The Causal Principle

A disposition is not automatically invalid because it is made by a person with a mental disorder. Case law has established that invalidity requires that the mental defect motivated the disposition - the so-called causal principle (cf. several Supreme Court decisions, most recently Rt 2005 p. 878).

This means that a comprehensive evaluation must be conducted of:

  • The nature of the disorder

  • The circumstances surrounding the agreement

  • The content of the disposition

  • Subsequent conditions

If the mental disorder is deemed significant after such an evaluation, the disposition becomes invalid regardless of whether the contracting party knew or should have understood that the disposition was influenced by the mental disorder.

The Fundamental Requirement of Mental Impairment

For the rule to apply, there must be:

  • Mental disorder (psychosis), where the person's perception of reality is disturbed, or

  • Profound intellectual disability (IQ under 50-55, corresponding to the developmental stage of an eight-year-old)

It is debated whether other mental states such as unconsciousness, severe neurotic states, or intoxication are covered by the rule. The Supreme Court has, by implication, assumed that a state of dementia can, in certain cases, be so severe that it must be equated with a severe mental disorder.

Legal Effects of Invalidity

For invalidity resulting from mental disorder, the main rule is that the parties are obliged to restore what was received or compensate the value. It is debated whether the obligation of the mentally ill to restore should be limited to the enrichment in accordance with the principle in Section 15, first paragraph of the Guardianship Act.

A good solution could be to apply the principle in the Guardianship Act analogically when circumstances warrant it, especially in cases where the mentally ill would otherwise end up in the same economic position as if the agreement were valid.

Summary

Incapacity defects in the form of minority and mental disorder represent significant limitations in contract law. Both are strong grounds for invalidity that can be invoked even against a good-faith contracting party. While minority as a ground for invalidity is regulated by the Guardianship Act, mental disorder as a ground for invalidity has been developed through case law.

The rules illustrate that freedom of contract in Norwegian law is conditioned upon a certain capacity for judgment by the person who is to be committed. At the same time, the various exceptions and nuances in the legal framework demonstrate that considerations of autonomy and freedom of action are also valued, even for individuals with reduced ability to safeguard their own interests.

Sterk Law Firm

Security through watertight agreements

Security through watertight agreements

Security through watertight agreements

Contracts form the framework for most binding relationships, whether in business or private life. A good contract creates predictability, allocates risk, and prevents conflicts. Inadequate contract regulation can, at worst, lead to prolonged disputes or significant financial losses. At Sterk Law Firm, you get a personal and pragmatic lawyer who understands your needs. We take the time to understand your business and industry so that we can tailor the terms to your purpose. At the same time, we pay attention to details and the "fine print" that can have major consequences. You can be assured that your rights and obligations are clearly and unambiguously set out. We have particular expertise in contracts related to construction, IT, commerce, real estate, and corporate matters. However, we also assist with more standalone agreements such as letters of intent, confidentiality agreements, leases, service agreements, and craftsmanship services. When necessary, we draw on the specialized expertise of our external partners. Most assignments begin with an assessment of the contract's purpose and the needs of the parties. We then review any drafts or offers from the counterparty and provide an evaluation of which terms should be included, amended, or removed. If desired, we can also draft the entire contract from scratch. Along the way, we maintain close communication with you as a client, ensuring you always have control over the process. We offer both ongoing advice and assistance with individual contracts. Our goal is to create long-term client relationships, and many choose us as their regular contract partner. We offer competitive prices and can provide advantageous framework agreements for businesses. Contact us today to find out what we can do for your business or contractual situation!

Contracts form the framework for most binding relationships, whether in business or private life. A good contract creates predictability, allocates risk, and prevents conflicts. Inadequate contract regulation can, at worst, lead to prolonged disputes or significant financial losses. At Sterk Law Firm, you get a personal and pragmatic lawyer who understands your needs. We take the time to understand your business and industry so that we can tailor the terms to your purpose. At the same time, we pay attention to details and the "fine print" that can have major consequences. You can be assured that your rights and obligations are clearly and unambiguously set out. We have particular expertise in contracts related to construction, IT, commerce, real estate, and corporate matters. However, we also assist with more standalone agreements such as letters of intent, confidentiality agreements, leases, service agreements, and craftsmanship services. When necessary, we draw on the specialized expertise of our external partners. Most assignments begin with an assessment of the contract's purpose and the needs of the parties. We then review any drafts or offers from the counterparty and provide an evaluation of which terms should be included, amended, or removed. If desired, we can also draft the entire contract from scratch. Along the way, we maintain close communication with you as a client, ensuring you always have control over the process. We offer both ongoing advice and assistance with individual contracts. Our goal is to create long-term client relationships, and many choose us as their regular contract partner. We offer competitive prices and can provide advantageous framework agreements for businesses. Contact us today to find out what we can do for your business or contractual situation!

Contracts form the framework for most binding relationships, whether in business or private life. A good contract creates predictability, allocates risk, and prevents conflicts. Inadequate contract regulation can, at worst, lead to prolonged disputes or significant financial losses. At Sterk Law Firm, you get a personal and pragmatic lawyer who understands your needs. We take the time to understand your business and industry so that we can tailor the terms to your purpose. At the same time, we pay attention to details and the "fine print" that can have major consequences. You can be assured that your rights and obligations are clearly and unambiguously set out. We have particular expertise in contracts related to construction, IT, commerce, real estate, and corporate matters. However, we also assist with more standalone agreements such as letters of intent, confidentiality agreements, leases, service agreements, and craftsmanship services. When necessary, we draw on the specialized expertise of our external partners. Most assignments begin with an assessment of the contract's purpose and the needs of the parties. We then review any drafts or offers from the counterparty and provide an evaluation of which terms should be included, amended, or removed. If desired, we can also draft the entire contract from scratch. Along the way, we maintain close communication with you as a client, ensuring you always have control over the process. We offer both ongoing advice and assistance with individual contracts. Our goal is to create long-term client relationships, and many choose us as their regular contract partner. We offer competitive prices and can provide advantageous framework agreements for businesses. Contact us today to find out what we can do for your business or contractual situation!

Advokatfirmaet Sterk
Advokatfirmaet Sterk
Advokatfirmaet Sterk

We draft contracts that protect your interests

We draft contracts that protect your interests

We draft contracts that protect your interests

Explore

More articles

Interpretation Rules and Standard Contracts in Norwegian Contract Law

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Interpretation Rules and Standard Contracts in Norwegian Contract Law

Interpretation rules are unwritten principles that provide guidance when the interpretative factors do not indicate a specific outcome in contract interpretation. The rule of ambiguity, the most central interpretative rule in Norwegian law, implies that the contract is interpreted against the party who should have expressed themselves more clearly. The minimum rule suggests that the least burdensome alternative for the promisor is chosen. For standard contracts, special considerations apply, but recent case law shows that these are also interpreted according to general interpretative principles. Particularly for 'agreed documents,' decisive weight is given to the wording, while unilateral standard terms are more often interpreted restrictively in favor of the weaker party.

Interpretation Rules and Standard Contracts in Norwegian Contract Law

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Interpretation Rules and Standard Contracts in Norwegian Contract Law

Interpretation rules are unwritten principles that provide guidance when the interpretative factors do not indicate a specific outcome in contract interpretation. The rule of ambiguity, the most central interpretative rule in Norwegian law, implies that the contract is interpreted against the party who should have expressed themselves more clearly. The minimum rule suggests that the least burdensome alternative for the promisor is chosen. For standard contracts, special considerations apply, but recent case law shows that these are also interpreted according to general interpretative principles. Particularly for 'agreed documents,' decisive weight is given to the wording, while unilateral standard terms are more often interpreted restrictively in favor of the weaker party.

Interpretation Rules and Standard Contracts in Norwegian Contract Law

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Interpretation Rules and Standard Contracts in Norwegian Contract Law

Interpretation rules are unwritten principles that provide guidance when the interpretative factors do not indicate a specific outcome in contract interpretation. The rule of ambiguity, the most central interpretative rule in Norwegian law, implies that the contract is interpreted against the party who should have expressed themselves more clearly. The minimum rule suggests that the least burdensome alternative for the promisor is chosen. For standard contracts, special considerations apply, but recent case law shows that these are also interpreted according to general interpretative principles. Particularly for 'agreed documents,' decisive weight is given to the wording, while unilateral standard terms are more often interpreted restrictively in favor of the weaker party.

Contract Interpretation in Norwegian Law: Key Principles and Methods

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Contract Interpretation in Norwegian Law: Key Principles and Methods

Contract interpretation is a central aspect of contract law and concerns establishing the legal effects that an entered agreement has between the parties. In Norwegian law, the interpretation process primarily follows the objective interpretation principle but can be modified by the mutual understanding of the parties. In cases of unclear wording, the purpose of the agreement, the expectations of the parties, and genuine considerations are emphasized. Commercial agreements are interpreted particularly strictly according to their wording. In cases of persistent ambiguity, the agreement may be supplemented with solutions from background law. The good faith standard protects parties who had a legitimate expectation of how the agreement should be understood.

Contract Interpretation in Norwegian Law: Key Principles and Methods

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Contract Interpretation in Norwegian Law: Key Principles and Methods

Contract interpretation is a central aspect of contract law and concerns establishing the legal effects that an entered agreement has between the parties. In Norwegian law, the interpretation process primarily follows the objective interpretation principle but can be modified by the mutual understanding of the parties. In cases of unclear wording, the purpose of the agreement, the expectations of the parties, and genuine considerations are emphasized. Commercial agreements are interpreted particularly strictly according to their wording. In cases of persistent ambiguity, the agreement may be supplemented with solutions from background law. The good faith standard protects parties who had a legitimate expectation of how the agreement should be understood.

Contract Interpretation in Norwegian Law: Key Principles and Methods

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Contract Interpretation in Norwegian Law: Key Principles and Methods

Contract interpretation is a central aspect of contract law and concerns establishing the legal effects that an entered agreement has between the parties. In Norwegian law, the interpretation process primarily follows the objective interpretation principle but can be modified by the mutual understanding of the parties. In cases of unclear wording, the purpose of the agreement, the expectations of the parties, and genuine considerations are emphasized. Commercial agreements are interpreted particularly strictly according to their wording. In cases of persistent ambiguity, the agreement may be supplemented with solutions from background law. The good faith standard protects parties who had a legitimate expectation of how the agreement should be understood.

Approval of Invalid Dispositions: Ratification in Norwegian Contract Law

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Approval of Invalid Dispositions: Ratification in Norwegian Contract Law

Can an agreement that is initially invalid be subsequently ratified and thereby obtain legal effect? This article explains when an invalid disposition can be remedied through subsequent approval (ratification), what limitations apply to various grounds for invalidity, and how a bona fide co-contractor may oppose such ratification. A key aspect of contract law that balances the consideration of freedom of contract against the need to protect weaker parties.

Approval of Invalid Dispositions: Ratification in Norwegian Contract Law

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Approval of Invalid Dispositions: Ratification in Norwegian Contract Law

Can an agreement that is initially invalid be subsequently ratified and thereby obtain legal effect? This article explains when an invalid disposition can be remedied through subsequent approval (ratification), what limitations apply to various grounds for invalidity, and how a bona fide co-contractor may oppose such ratification. A key aspect of contract law that balances the consideration of freedom of contract against the need to protect weaker parties.

Approval of Invalid Dispositions: Ratification in Norwegian Contract Law

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Approval of Invalid Dispositions: Ratification in Norwegian Contract Law

Can an agreement that is initially invalid be subsequently ratified and thereby obtain legal effect? This article explains when an invalid disposition can be remedied through subsequent approval (ratification), what limitations apply to various grounds for invalidity, and how a bona fide co-contractor may oppose such ratification. A key aspect of contract law that balances the consideration of freedom of contract against the need to protect weaker parties.

Content Deficiencies in Agreements: Legal Overview and Consequences

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Content Deficiencies in Agreements: Legal Overview and Consequences

When is an agreement invalid due to its content? This article provides an overview of central rules regarding content defects, ranging from agreements about games and betting to the general leniency rule in the Contracts Act § 36. The article explains when courts may set aside or amend agreements with unreasonable content, and how consumers have special protection through the Contracts Act § 37. Key decisions from the Supreme Court illustrate how the rules operate in practice.

Content Deficiencies in Agreements: Legal Overview and Consequences

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Content Deficiencies in Agreements: Legal Overview and Consequences

When is an agreement invalid due to its content? This article provides an overview of central rules regarding content defects, ranging from agreements about games and betting to the general leniency rule in the Contracts Act § 36. The article explains when courts may set aside or amend agreements with unreasonable content, and how consumers have special protection through the Contracts Act § 37. Key decisions from the Supreme Court illustrate how the rules operate in practice.

Content Deficiencies in Agreements: Legal Overview and Consequences

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Content Deficiencies in Agreements: Legal Overview and Consequences

When is an agreement invalid due to its content? This article provides an overview of central rules regarding content defects, ranging from agreements about games and betting to the general leniency rule in the Contracts Act § 36. The article explains when courts may set aside or amend agreements with unreasonable content, and how consumers have special protection through the Contracts Act § 37. Key decisions from the Supreme Court illustrate how the rules operate in practice.

Contact us

Contact Sterk Law Firm for legal assistance and advice. Our dedicated team of experienced lawyers is ready to find tailored solutions for your specific challenges.

Portrait of a man in a suit with arms crossed, in front of a graphic background – expressing professionalism and confidence
Portrait of a man in a suit with arms crossed, in front of a graphic background – expressing professionalism and confidence

By submitting this form, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.