Apr 15, 2025

Negotiation Agreements and Alternative Forms of Agreement Conclusion in Norwegian Law

Negotiation Agreements and Alternative Contractual Forms in Norwegian Law
Negotiation Agreements and Alternative Contractual Forms in Norwegian Law
Negotiation Agreements and Alternative Contractual Forms in Norwegian Law

The model of the Contract Act with offer and acceptance is not sufficient to describe all forms of contract formation in modern business. This article provides an overview of how commercial negotiation agreements come into being, as well as other key alternative contract conclusion forms such as mass agreements, public procurement, and standard terms. Knowledge of these alternative contract conclusion forms is crucial to understanding when and how binding agreements arise in situations where the model of the Contract Act falls short.

Negotiation Agreements: From Negotiations to a Binding Agreement

When the Contract Act's Model Becomes Impractical

Commercial agreements are often the result of negotiations that extend over time. These agreements obtain their content as negotiations progress (successive agreements). It is impractical to view such negotiations as a series of offers and counteroffers as assumed by the Contract Act.

Typical complications with negotiation agreements include:

  • Conditional promises tied to progress in other areas

  • Non-binding proposals that require further review

  • Focus on main issues first, with details deferred

This raises questions about when binding occurs: Can a party retract a statement in a sub-question if overall agreement is not achieved? Or does successive binding occur as negotiations progress?

The Parties' Ability to Define the Binding Time

The parties can mutually agree on which disposition criteria should be dispositive:

  1. Signing Condition: The parties can agree that no one shall be bound until both have signed a written agreement. This excludes gradual binding during negotiations.

  2. Order Confirmation: The seller may reserve the right to remain unbound until he has confirmed the buyer's order, for instance, to check the buyer's creditworthiness.

  3. Stepwise Binding: The parties can formalize and sign "sub-agreements" that clarify the extent to which binding exists.

  4. Due Diligence Process: The parties may agree that the agreement does not bind the buyer until an investigation of the company is conducted.

  5. Board Condition: A director may sign subject to board approval.

Stepwise Binding: When Does the Contractual Obligation Arise?

When the parties have not agreed on the binding time, the question arises as to when binding occurs. The Supreme Court has in several rulings held that it is sufficient for binding that the parties agree on the main points of the contractual relationship.

In the Vinagentur Case (Rt 1998 p 946), the Supreme Court stated that "there is no legal basis to generally require written expression in more complex contractual relationships" and that "as the results of the negotiations show and agreement is reached, each party, based on a general assumption of mutual loyalty, may have grounds to believe that the parties are bound even if the final agreement is not signed."

In the Mæle Case (Rt 2006 p 1585), the Supreme Court held that an agreement on the distribution of forest properties was bindingly entered into, even though many matters had not been agreed upon.

Also in Optimogården (Rt 2011 p 410) and Strömstad Marina (Rt 2014 p 100), the Supreme Court confirmed that contractual binding can occur when agreement is reached on main points, even if details are not resolved and the agreement is not signed.

In simpler contractual relationships, it is often sufficient that agreement on the main points is achieved, while more complex, long-term contractual relationships may require stricter agreement requirements.

Letter of Intent: Legally Binding or Merely Morally Obligatory?

Purpose of the Letter of Intent

Letters of intent are declarations that in a sketch form indicate a goal and some main points of a contract that the parties wish to bring into being. They are often used when:

  • The intended agreement is extensive and complicated

  • The parties are under time pressure

  • It is necessary to conduct extensive investigations before a binding agreement can be made

Are Letters of Intent Legally Binding?

The presumption is that letters of intent do not obligate the parties to enter into the intended agreement. The Supreme Court stated in Rt 1995 p 543 that "[t]he presumption with agreements of this type is that the parties are not obligated to enter into the intended agreement".

This presumption can be justified by:

  • The need to be able to express an intention to negotiate without being legally bound

  • Letters of intent are often signed by individuals without formal authority

  • It could become a "trap" for the parties if letters of intent presumptively carried promise effects

Even if the letter of intent is not considered to obligate the parties to enter into the intended agreement, it might still be that a party who withdraws from the cooperation without reasonable cause is required to compensate the other party's expenses (negative contractual interest).

Mass Agreements: When the Contract Act's Model Does Not Fit

Mass agreements are contracts entered into in large quantities in daily life and are constantly repeated. Typical examples are:

  • Purchases in a supermarket

  • Transactions with an automatic machine

  • Ticket purchases for public transportation

  • Parking a car in a parking space

In these agreements, it is impossible to identify anything akin to an offer and acceptance in the sense of the Contract Act. It is the simple actions related to the agreement that constitute relevant disposition criteria—monies put in a machine, a parking space being used, goods paid for in a supermarket.

A Swedish Supreme Court ruling (NJA 1981 p 323) held that binding in a parking situation occurs through "a person's actual actions," i.e., parking the car in the parking space.

Public Procurement: Tender Competition as a Contract Conclusion Form

Special Rules for Public Contracts

In public procurement, the public body is not free in terms of choosing the counterparty, contract terms, or the method of contract conclusion. The Public Procurement Act and related regulations set the boundaries for how contract formation should occur.

The process follows a formalized procedure in the form of a tender competition, where fundamental principles are competition, equality of treatment, predictability, verifiability, and proportionality.

The "Course" of a Tender Case

  1. Announcement: The awarding authority issues an announcement that the contract will be awarded through a tender competition.

  2. Tender Document: The awarding authority prepares a tender document with information about what is to be procured and the terms.

  3. Offer: The suppliers prepare and submit offers within the submission deadline.

  4. Binding: The offer is legally binding from the moment it is submitted.

  5. Standstill Period: The period the offers are binding (normally 30 days unless otherwise specified).

  6. Award: The awarding authority selects one of the offers based on predetermined award criteria.

  7. Contract Conclusion: The parties sign a mutual document.

Binding and Legal Effects

In tender competitions, the offer is binding from submission and cannot be withdrawn or altered. The supplier's obligation also means that he cannot lower the price, even if he discovers that others have undercut him.

If a supplier believes the awarding process has occurred in violation of the rules, the case can be brought before the Public Procurement Complaints Board (KOFA) or the courts.

Standard Terms: When Are They Binding?

The Requirement of Adoption

For standard terms to become part of the agreement, they must be agreed upon by both parties. The decisive factor is whether the standard terms have been brought to the other party's attention—written or oral—before the contract conclusion.

Standard terms are not normally considered agreed if:

  • They are presented in a way that the counterparty did not have a reasonable opportunity to understand that they were intended as part of the agreement

  • The counterparty did not have a reasonable opportunity to understand what they contain

This can be summarized as "surprising standard terms," cf. Rt 1968 p 1188 (Pakkseddel Case) and Rt 2004 p 675 (Agurkpinne Case).

The requirement of adoption is tightened where the terms indicate it, especially for disclaimers or terms that place the party in a significantly worse position than the declaratory background law.

Competing Standard Conditions ("Battle of Forms")

A particular problem arises when both parties have their standard terms that they want to apply to the agreement. There is no certain solution as to which party's standard terms shall apply in Norwegian law, but several alternatives can be considered:

  1. "The man who gets the blow in first": The one who first sends his standard terms wins.

  2. "The man who fires the last shot": The one who last sends his terms wins.

  3. Both parties lose, and declaratory law applies.

  4. The terms that most align with declaratory law shall take precedence.

  5. A harmonization of the two sets of standard terms.

  6. "Knock-out doctrine": The contract is concluded on the terms the parties agree on, supplemented by provisions common to both parties' standard terms.

Conclusion

Contract formation often occurs in practice according to rules and principles other than the model of the Contract Act. Negotiation agreements, letters of intent, mass agreements, tender competitions, and standard terms each represent important alternatives to the traditional offer/acceptance model.

Norwegian case law shows that courts place decisive emphasis on the expectancy principle: The central question is whether justified expectations about the existence of an agreement and, if so, on what terms it is established. This principle applies regardless of the form of contract conclusion used.

For parties seeking predictability, it is important to be explicit about when they consider themselves bound and on what terms. Especially with negotiation agreements, the use of signing conditions or stepwise formalization can be useful to avoid doubt about the binding time.

Sterk Law Firm

Security through watertight agreements

Security through watertight agreements

Security through watertight agreements

Contracts form the framework for most binding relationships, whether in business or private life. A good contract creates predictability, allocates risk, and prevents conflicts. Inadequate contract regulation can, at worst, lead to prolonged disputes or significant financial losses. At Sterk Law Firm, you get a personal and pragmatic lawyer who understands your needs. We take the time to understand your business and industry so that we can tailor the terms to your purpose. At the same time, we pay attention to details and the "fine print" that can have major consequences. You can be assured that your rights and obligations are clearly and unambiguously set out. We have particular expertise in contracts related to construction, IT, commerce, real estate, and corporate matters. However, we also assist with more standalone agreements such as letters of intent, confidentiality agreements, leases, service agreements, and craftsmanship services. When necessary, we draw on the specialized expertise of our external partners. Most assignments begin with an assessment of the contract's purpose and the needs of the parties. We then review any drafts or offers from the counterparty and provide an evaluation of which terms should be included, amended, or removed. If desired, we can also draft the entire contract from scratch. Along the way, we maintain close communication with you as a client, ensuring you always have control over the process. We offer both ongoing advice and assistance with individual contracts. Our goal is to create long-term client relationships, and many choose us as their regular contract partner. We offer competitive prices and can provide advantageous framework agreements for businesses. Contact us today to find out what we can do for your business or contractual situation!

Contracts form the framework for most binding relationships, whether in business or private life. A good contract creates predictability, allocates risk, and prevents conflicts. Inadequate contract regulation can, at worst, lead to prolonged disputes or significant financial losses. At Sterk Law Firm, you get a personal and pragmatic lawyer who understands your needs. We take the time to understand your business and industry so that we can tailor the terms to your purpose. At the same time, we pay attention to details and the "fine print" that can have major consequences. You can be assured that your rights and obligations are clearly and unambiguously set out. We have particular expertise in contracts related to construction, IT, commerce, real estate, and corporate matters. However, we also assist with more standalone agreements such as letters of intent, confidentiality agreements, leases, service agreements, and craftsmanship services. When necessary, we draw on the specialized expertise of our external partners. Most assignments begin with an assessment of the contract's purpose and the needs of the parties. We then review any drafts or offers from the counterparty and provide an evaluation of which terms should be included, amended, or removed. If desired, we can also draft the entire contract from scratch. Along the way, we maintain close communication with you as a client, ensuring you always have control over the process. We offer both ongoing advice and assistance with individual contracts. Our goal is to create long-term client relationships, and many choose us as their regular contract partner. We offer competitive prices and can provide advantageous framework agreements for businesses. Contact us today to find out what we can do for your business or contractual situation!

Contracts form the framework for most binding relationships, whether in business or private life. A good contract creates predictability, allocates risk, and prevents conflicts. Inadequate contract regulation can, at worst, lead to prolonged disputes or significant financial losses. At Sterk Law Firm, you get a personal and pragmatic lawyer who understands your needs. We take the time to understand your business and industry so that we can tailor the terms to your purpose. At the same time, we pay attention to details and the "fine print" that can have major consequences. You can be assured that your rights and obligations are clearly and unambiguously set out. We have particular expertise in contracts related to construction, IT, commerce, real estate, and corporate matters. However, we also assist with more standalone agreements such as letters of intent, confidentiality agreements, leases, service agreements, and craftsmanship services. When necessary, we draw on the specialized expertise of our external partners. Most assignments begin with an assessment of the contract's purpose and the needs of the parties. We then review any drafts or offers from the counterparty and provide an evaluation of which terms should be included, amended, or removed. If desired, we can also draft the entire contract from scratch. Along the way, we maintain close communication with you as a client, ensuring you always have control over the process. We offer both ongoing advice and assistance with individual contracts. Our goal is to create long-term client relationships, and many choose us as their regular contract partner. We offer competitive prices and can provide advantageous framework agreements for businesses. Contact us today to find out what we can do for your business or contractual situation!

Advokatfirmaet Sterk
Advokatfirmaet Sterk
Advokatfirmaet Sterk

We draft contracts that protect your interests

We draft contracts that protect your interests

We draft contracts that protect your interests

Explore

More articles

Interpretation Rules and Standard Contracts in Norwegian Contract Law

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Interpretation Rules and Standard Contracts in Norwegian Contract Law

Interpretation rules are unwritten principles that provide guidance when the interpretative factors do not indicate a specific outcome in contract interpretation. The rule of ambiguity, the most central interpretative rule in Norwegian law, implies that the contract is interpreted against the party who should have expressed themselves more clearly. The minimum rule suggests that the least burdensome alternative for the promisor is chosen. For standard contracts, special considerations apply, but recent case law shows that these are also interpreted according to general interpretative principles. Particularly for 'agreed documents,' decisive weight is given to the wording, while unilateral standard terms are more often interpreted restrictively in favor of the weaker party.

Interpretation Rules and Standard Contracts in Norwegian Contract Law

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Interpretation Rules and Standard Contracts in Norwegian Contract Law

Interpretation rules are unwritten principles that provide guidance when the interpretative factors do not indicate a specific outcome in contract interpretation. The rule of ambiguity, the most central interpretative rule in Norwegian law, implies that the contract is interpreted against the party who should have expressed themselves more clearly. The minimum rule suggests that the least burdensome alternative for the promisor is chosen. For standard contracts, special considerations apply, but recent case law shows that these are also interpreted according to general interpretative principles. Particularly for 'agreed documents,' decisive weight is given to the wording, while unilateral standard terms are more often interpreted restrictively in favor of the weaker party.

Interpretation Rules and Standard Contracts in Norwegian Contract Law

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Interpretation Rules and Standard Contracts in Norwegian Contract Law

Interpretation rules are unwritten principles that provide guidance when the interpretative factors do not indicate a specific outcome in contract interpretation. The rule of ambiguity, the most central interpretative rule in Norwegian law, implies that the contract is interpreted against the party who should have expressed themselves more clearly. The minimum rule suggests that the least burdensome alternative for the promisor is chosen. For standard contracts, special considerations apply, but recent case law shows that these are also interpreted according to general interpretative principles. Particularly for 'agreed documents,' decisive weight is given to the wording, while unilateral standard terms are more often interpreted restrictively in favor of the weaker party.

Contract Interpretation in Norwegian Law: Key Principles and Methods

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Contract Interpretation in Norwegian Law: Key Principles and Methods

Contract interpretation is a central aspect of contract law and concerns establishing the legal effects that an entered agreement has between the parties. In Norwegian law, the interpretation process primarily follows the objective interpretation principle but can be modified by the mutual understanding of the parties. In cases of unclear wording, the purpose of the agreement, the expectations of the parties, and genuine considerations are emphasized. Commercial agreements are interpreted particularly strictly according to their wording. In cases of persistent ambiguity, the agreement may be supplemented with solutions from background law. The good faith standard protects parties who had a legitimate expectation of how the agreement should be understood.

Contract Interpretation in Norwegian Law: Key Principles and Methods

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Contract Interpretation in Norwegian Law: Key Principles and Methods

Contract interpretation is a central aspect of contract law and concerns establishing the legal effects that an entered agreement has between the parties. In Norwegian law, the interpretation process primarily follows the objective interpretation principle but can be modified by the mutual understanding of the parties. In cases of unclear wording, the purpose of the agreement, the expectations of the parties, and genuine considerations are emphasized. Commercial agreements are interpreted particularly strictly according to their wording. In cases of persistent ambiguity, the agreement may be supplemented with solutions from background law. The good faith standard protects parties who had a legitimate expectation of how the agreement should be understood.

Contract Interpretation in Norwegian Law: Key Principles and Methods

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Contract Interpretation in Norwegian Law: Key Principles and Methods

Contract interpretation is a central aspect of contract law and concerns establishing the legal effects that an entered agreement has between the parties. In Norwegian law, the interpretation process primarily follows the objective interpretation principle but can be modified by the mutual understanding of the parties. In cases of unclear wording, the purpose of the agreement, the expectations of the parties, and genuine considerations are emphasized. Commercial agreements are interpreted particularly strictly according to their wording. In cases of persistent ambiguity, the agreement may be supplemented with solutions from background law. The good faith standard protects parties who had a legitimate expectation of how the agreement should be understood.

Approval of Invalid Dispositions: Ratification in Norwegian Contract Law

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Approval of Invalid Dispositions: Ratification in Norwegian Contract Law

Can an agreement that is initially invalid be subsequently ratified and thereby obtain legal effect? This article explains when an invalid disposition can be remedied through subsequent approval (ratification), what limitations apply to various grounds for invalidity, and how a bona fide co-contractor may oppose such ratification. A key aspect of contract law that balances the consideration of freedom of contract against the need to protect weaker parties.

Approval of Invalid Dispositions: Ratification in Norwegian Contract Law

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Approval of Invalid Dispositions: Ratification in Norwegian Contract Law

Can an agreement that is initially invalid be subsequently ratified and thereby obtain legal effect? This article explains when an invalid disposition can be remedied through subsequent approval (ratification), what limitations apply to various grounds for invalidity, and how a bona fide co-contractor may oppose such ratification. A key aspect of contract law that balances the consideration of freedom of contract against the need to protect weaker parties.

Approval of Invalid Dispositions: Ratification in Norwegian Contract Law

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Approval of Invalid Dispositions: Ratification in Norwegian Contract Law

Can an agreement that is initially invalid be subsequently ratified and thereby obtain legal effect? This article explains when an invalid disposition can be remedied through subsequent approval (ratification), what limitations apply to various grounds for invalidity, and how a bona fide co-contractor may oppose such ratification. A key aspect of contract law that balances the consideration of freedom of contract against the need to protect weaker parties.

Content Deficiencies in Agreements: Legal Overview and Consequences

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Content Deficiencies in Agreements: Legal Overview and Consequences

When is an agreement invalid due to its content? This article provides an overview of central rules regarding content defects, ranging from agreements about games and betting to the general leniency rule in the Contracts Act § 36. The article explains when courts may set aside or amend agreements with unreasonable content, and how consumers have special protection through the Contracts Act § 37. Key decisions from the Supreme Court illustrate how the rules operate in practice.

Content Deficiencies in Agreements: Legal Overview and Consequences

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Content Deficiencies in Agreements: Legal Overview and Consequences

When is an agreement invalid due to its content? This article provides an overview of central rules regarding content defects, ranging from agreements about games and betting to the general leniency rule in the Contracts Act § 36. The article explains when courts may set aside or amend agreements with unreasonable content, and how consumers have special protection through the Contracts Act § 37. Key decisions from the Supreme Court illustrate how the rules operate in practice.

Content Deficiencies in Agreements: Legal Overview and Consequences

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Content Deficiencies in Agreements: Legal Overview and Consequences

When is an agreement invalid due to its content? This article provides an overview of central rules regarding content defects, ranging from agreements about games and betting to the general leniency rule in the Contracts Act § 36. The article explains when courts may set aside or amend agreements with unreasonable content, and how consumers have special protection through the Contracts Act § 37. Key decisions from the Supreme Court illustrate how the rules operate in practice.

Contact us

Contact Sterk Law Firm for legal assistance and advice. Our dedicated team of experienced lawyers is ready to find tailored solutions for your specific challenges.

Portrait of a man in a suit with arms crossed, in front of a graphic background – expressing professionalism and confidence
Portrait of a man in a suit with arms crossed, in front of a graphic background – expressing professionalism and confidence

By submitting this form, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.