Apr 8, 2025

Part-time employees' right to a position corresponding to actual working hours – Rules and practice

Part-time employees' right to positions corresponding to actual working hours
Part-time employees' right to positions corresponding to actual working hours
Part-time employees' right to positions corresponding to actual working hours

Many part-time employees regularly work beyond their agreed employment percentage without formalizing this into a larger position. The Working Environment Act §§ 14-4a and 14-4b give part-time employees the right to have their position size adjusted to the actual work performed. This provision strengthens the protection of part-time employees and ensures consistency between formal position size and actual workload.

The rules complement the priority right in the Working Environment Act § 14-3, which gives part-time employees priority in new hires. When no new hires are made, but part-time employees still regularly undertake extra work, § 14-4a applies.

Conditions for claiming an expanded position

For a part-time employee to have the right to a position equivalent to the actual working hours, the following conditions must be met:

1. Work beyond agreed working hours

The employee must have carried out work beyond what is stated in the employment contract. This can be extra shifts or other additional work that supplements the fixed employment percentage. The reason for the additional work is irrelevant to the assessment.

It is important to note that work performed as a formal temporary employment in addition to the main position is excluded from this provision. The provision only covers additional work that is not regulated by a separate employment contract.

2. Regular extra work over twelve months

The additional work must have been performed "regularly" over a period of twelve months. What is considered "regular" is based on a specific discretionary assessment, where the following elements are key:

  • Frequency: How often the extra work is performed

  • Extent: How many hours the extra work constitutes

  • Stability: How evenly distributed the extra work is throughout the period

There are no strict requirements for the extra work, but according to the practice of the Dispute Resolution Board, there will be some relativity between the elements:

  • Low extent requires higher stability

  • Extra work corresponding to less than 10% of a position must be evenly spread over the period

  • It is not required that the work is performed weekly

The calculation period of twelve months is counted from the time the employee made their claim. There are no formal requirements for how the claim is presented, but the employer is obligated to keep records of actual working hours, and payslips and work schedules can be used as documentation.

3. Continued need for extra work

Even if the above conditions are met, the employee does not have the right to an expanded position if the employer can document that the need for extra work no longer exists. The employer must be able to show that the need for extra work will decrease or disappear in the near future.

This can be justified, for example, by:

  • Completed or planned reductions in staff

  • Probable layoffs

  • Other organizational changes that reduce the need

If the need is only reduced, not disappeared, the employee is entitled to a position corresponding to the remaining need.

What does the right to an expanded position entail?

When the conditions are met, the employee has the right to "a position corresponding to the actual working hours." This entails:

Position size

The position size is determined, as a starting point, through an average calculation of the extra work during the calculation period, but some discretion can be applied. "Full position" represents an upper limit for what can be claimed.

Workplace and assignments

The expanded part of the position should, as a starting point, reflect the content of the extra work performed during the calculation period. This means that:

  • The employee can only claim a workplace corresponding to where the extra work was performed

  • The timing of work must correspond to when the extra work was performed

  • If the extra work was performed in departments other than the main position, the employee must accept that this continues

"All or nothing"

The employee's right includes, in principle, the entire expansion, not parts of it. The employee cannot choose a smaller position size than the actual extra work indicates unless agreed with the employer.

Dispute resolution and legal effects

Disputes about the right to a position corresponding to actual working hours should first be addressed by the Dispute Resolution Board. The case cannot be brought to the courts before it has been heard in the board.

If the board finds that the conditions are met, it shall, at the employee's request, issue a ruling for employment in a position corresponding to actual working hours. Unlike the rules on priority rights and temporary employment, there is no reservation of unreasonableness. This is because the employer's interests are considered protected through the possibility of documenting that the need for extra work no longer exists.

Practical advice for employers

To manage the rules on the right to a position corresponding to actual working hours, employers should:

  1. Keep accurate records of part-time employees' actual working hours

  2. Regularly assess staffing needs and proactively offer expanded positions when extra work becomes systematic

  3. Document temporary needs for additional help to be able to show that the need is not permanent

  4. Be aware of "venting" - arranging interruptions in extra work to circumvent the rules can be seen through

Benefits of formalizing actual working hours

There are several benefits to formalizing part-time employees' actual working hours:

  • Predictability for both employer and employee

  • Reduced administration of extra shifts and additional work

  • Enhanced job security for the employee

  • Better basis for pension accrual and other benefits based on position size

  • Compliance with legislation and reduced risk of disputes

Summary

The provisions of the Working Environment Act concerning part-time employees' right to a position corresponding to actual working hours are an important tool to reduce involuntary part-time work and ensure consistency between formal employment percentage and actual workload. To have the right to an expanded position, the employee must have performed extra work regularly over twelve months, and the employer must not be able to document that the need for extra work has disappeared.

In case of disputes, the matter should first be handled by the Dispute Resolution Board. If the conditions are met, the board can issue a ruling for employment in a position corresponding to actual working hours, without any reservation of unreasonableness.

Sterk Law Firm

Your Partner for a Well-Functioning Workplace

Your Partner for a Well-Functioning Workplace

Your Partner for a Well-Functioning Workplace

Employment law challenges can be complex and time-consuming, whether you are a business leader or an employee. The consequences of incorrect handling can be significant, both in human and economic terms. Our lawyers have extensive experience from various aspects of working life and broad expertise in all areas of employment law. We can therefore offer precise advice and support throughout the process, allowing you to focus on your core business.

Employment law challenges can be complex and time-consuming, whether you are a business leader or an employee. The consequences of incorrect handling can be significant, both in human and economic terms. Our lawyers have extensive experience from various aspects of working life and broad expertise in all areas of employment law. We can therefore offer precise advice and support throughout the process, allowing you to focus on your core business.

Employment law challenges can be complex and time-consuming, whether you are a business leader or an employee. The consequences of incorrect handling can be significant, both in human and economic terms. Our lawyers have extensive experience from various aspects of working life and broad expertise in all areas of employment law. We can therefore offer precise advice and support throughout the process, allowing you to focus on your core business.

Advokatfirmaet Sterk
Advokatfirmaet Sterk
Advokatfirmaet Sterk

Comprehensive Employment Law Assistance

Comprehensive Employment Law Assistance

Comprehensive Employment Law Assistance

Explore

More articles

Disputes Regarding Termination - Rights and Process

Employment Law

Sep 16, 2025

Disputes Regarding the Legality of Dismissal - Employees' Rights and Employers' Risks During Downsizing

Disputes regarding the legality of dismissals provide employees with extensive rights that can result in significant costs for employers. The right to remain employed while the dispute is ongoing entails continued salary payments for months or years. Employees can demand negotiations within two weeks, and lawsuits must be filed within eight weeks. Employers may request resignation due to unreasonable circumstances, but the threshold is high for dismissals related to the company's circumstances. Unjust dismissals result in invalidity and compensation. The right of priority applies for one year after dismissal. Thorough case management and evaluation of severance packages can reduce the risk of disputes.

Disputes Regarding Termination - Rights and Process

Employment Law

Sep 16, 2025

Disputes Regarding the Legality of Dismissal - Employees' Rights and Employers' Risks During Downsizing

Disputes regarding the legality of dismissals provide employees with extensive rights that can result in significant costs for employers. The right to remain employed while the dispute is ongoing entails continued salary payments for months or years. Employees can demand negotiations within two weeks, and lawsuits must be filed within eight weeks. Employers may request resignation due to unreasonable circumstances, but the threshold is high for dismissals related to the company's circumstances. Unjust dismissals result in invalidity and compensation. The right of priority applies for one year after dismissal. Thorough case management and evaluation of severance packages can reduce the risk of disputes.

Disputes Regarding Termination - Rights and Process

Employment Law

Sep 16, 2025

Disputes Regarding the Legality of Dismissal - Employees' Rights and Employers' Risks During Downsizing

Disputes regarding the legality of dismissals provide employees with extensive rights that can result in significant costs for employers. The right to remain employed while the dispute is ongoing entails continued salary payments for months or years. Employees can demand negotiations within two weeks, and lawsuits must be filed within eight weeks. Employers may request resignation due to unreasonable circumstances, but the threshold is high for dismissals related to the company's circumstances. Unjust dismissals result in invalidity and compensation. The right of priority applies for one year after dismissal. Thorough case management and evaluation of severance packages can reduce the risk of disputes.

Case Handling in Downsizing - Comprehensive Guide

Employment Law

Sep 16, 2025

Case Management for Downsizing - Comprehensive Guidance and Process Guide for Businesses

Proper case handling during downsizing requires a systematic approach with documentation of the need for change, early discussions with union representatives, board endorsement, and individual meetings with affected employees. Mass layoffs trigger specific notification requirements to NAV. Procedural errors can result in invalid terminations and liability for damages. Termination letters must meet strict formal requirements and be delivered correctly. Thorough planning, involvement of union representatives, and legal advice are essential for a responsible execution. An extensive checklist ensures compliance with all requirements.

Case Handling in Downsizing - Comprehensive Guide

Employment Law

Sep 16, 2025

Case Management for Downsizing - Comprehensive Guidance and Process Guide for Businesses

Proper case handling during downsizing requires a systematic approach with documentation of the need for change, early discussions with union representatives, board endorsement, and individual meetings with affected employees. Mass layoffs trigger specific notification requirements to NAV. Procedural errors can result in invalid terminations and liability for damages. Termination letters must meet strict formal requirements and be delivered correctly. Thorough planning, involvement of union representatives, and legal advice are essential for a responsible execution. An extensive checklist ensures compliance with all requirements.

Case Handling in Downsizing - Comprehensive Guide

Employment Law

Sep 16, 2025

Case Management for Downsizing - Comprehensive Guidance and Process Guide for Businesses

Proper case handling during downsizing requires a systematic approach with documentation of the need for change, early discussions with union representatives, board endorsement, and individual meetings with affected employees. Mass layoffs trigger specific notification requirements to NAV. Procedural errors can result in invalid terminations and liability for damages. Termination letters must meet strict formal requirements and be delivered correctly. Thorough planning, involvement of union representatives, and legal advice are essential for a responsible execution. An extensive checklist ensures compliance with all requirements.

Reassignment and Termination of Employment - Legal Frameworks

Employment Law

Sep 16, 2025

Reassignment and Modification Termination - Alternatives to Dismissal during Organizational Changes

Reassignment and termination due to changes are important alternatives to regular termination during restructuring. Changes within the "essential nature" of the position can be implemented under management authority, while substantial changes require termination due to changes. The threshold for termination due to changes is lower than that for regular termination. Procedural requirements must be followed, including consultation meetings. This is particularly relevant for older employees with long seniority. Information, consultation, and involvement of union representatives are central to an appropriate process.

Reassignment and Termination of Employment - Legal Frameworks

Employment Law

Sep 16, 2025

Reassignment and Modification Termination - Alternatives to Dismissal during Organizational Changes

Reassignment and termination due to changes are important alternatives to regular termination during restructuring. Changes within the "essential nature" of the position can be implemented under management authority, while substantial changes require termination due to changes. The threshold for termination due to changes is lower than that for regular termination. Procedural requirements must be followed, including consultation meetings. This is particularly relevant for older employees with long seniority. Information, consultation, and involvement of union representatives are central to an appropriate process.

Reassignment and Termination of Employment - Legal Frameworks

Employment Law

Sep 16, 2025

Reassignment and Modification Termination - Alternatives to Dismissal during Organizational Changes

Reassignment and termination due to changes are important alternatives to regular termination during restructuring. Changes within the "essential nature" of the position can be implemented under management authority, while substantial changes require termination due to changes. The threshold for termination due to changes is lower than that for regular termination. Procedural requirements must be followed, including consultation meetings. This is particularly relevant for older employees with long seniority. Information, consultation, and involvement of union representatives are central to an appropriate process.

Balancing of Interests in Termination - Legal Framework

Employment Law

Sep 16, 2025

Balancing of Interests in Termination - Balancing the Needs of the Business and the Employee

The weighing of interests when it comes to termination requires a concrete balancing between the needs of the business and the individual situation of the employee. The provision functions as a safety valve and aims at extraordinary circumstances beyond normal inconveniences associated with termination. NAV's role as a safety net is included in the assessment. The Supreme Court's practice shows that it takes a lot for the balancing of interests to be decisive when downsizing is justified, especially when other suitable employment is offered. The obligation takes precedence over collective agreements concerning mere seniority.

Balancing of Interests in Termination - Legal Framework

Employment Law

Sep 16, 2025

Balancing of Interests in Termination - Balancing the Needs of the Business and the Employee

The weighing of interests when it comes to termination requires a concrete balancing between the needs of the business and the individual situation of the employee. The provision functions as a safety valve and aims at extraordinary circumstances beyond normal inconveniences associated with termination. NAV's role as a safety net is included in the assessment. The Supreme Court's practice shows that it takes a lot for the balancing of interests to be decisive when downsizing is justified, especially when other suitable employment is offered. The obligation takes precedence over collective agreements concerning mere seniority.

Balancing of Interests in Termination - Legal Framework

Employment Law

Sep 16, 2025

Balancing of Interests in Termination - Balancing the Needs of the Business and the Employee

The weighing of interests when it comes to termination requires a concrete balancing between the needs of the business and the individual situation of the employee. The provision functions as a safety valve and aims at extraordinary circumstances beyond normal inconveniences associated with termination. NAV's role as a safety net is included in the assessment. The Supreme Court's practice shows that it takes a lot for the balancing of interests to be decisive when downsizing is justified, especially when other suitable employment is offered. The obligation takes precedence over collective agreements concerning mere seniority.

Contact us

Contact Sterk Law Firm for legal assistance and advice. Our dedicated team of experienced lawyers is ready to find tailored solutions for your specific challenges.

Portrett av mann i dress med armene i kors, foran grafisk bakgrunn – uttrykker profesjonalitet og selvsikkerhet
Portrett av mann i dress med armene i kors, foran grafisk bakgrunn – uttrykker profesjonalitet og selvsikkerhet

By submitting this form, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.