Apr 8, 2025

Right of Preference in Working Life – Rules, Conditions, and Employer's Obligations

Right of Preference for Employment: Legal Framework and Practical Implementation
Right of Preference for Employment: Legal Framework and Practical Implementation
Right of Preference for Employment: Legal Framework and Practical Implementation

The right of priority rules in the Working Environment Act grant certain groups of employees the right to be prioritized during company recruitments. The purpose of these rules is to enhance job security and promote full-time employment. The right of priority limits the employer's freedom of choice in recruitment, but not the actual freedom to decide whether to hire at all. This article provides a systematic review of who has the right of priority, under what circumstances it applies, and what consequences violations of the rules can have.

Categories with Right of Priority and Ranking

The Working Environment Act establishes several groups of employees who may have the right of priority, and the legislator has established a clear order of precedence among them:

1. Permanent Employees Dismissed Due to Company Reasons

Permanent employees who are dismissed due to company reasons have the highest priority. This also applies to employees who have accepted reduced positions instead of dismissal.

2. Part-time Employees

The right of priority for part-time employees applies to the expansion of positions and gives them priority over new hires, but after dismissed permanent employees.

3. Temporary Employees

Temporary employees who do not continue their employment due to company reasons have third priority. This does not apply to temporary replacements.

4. Employees with Reduced Working Hours

Employees who have been granted reduced working hours for welfare reasons under § 10-2 (4) of the Working Environment Act have the right of priority to increase their working hours if a position with the same tasks becomes available.

5. Employees Who Have Reserved Themselves During Business Transfer

Employees who have exercised the right of reservation during a business transfer have the lowest priority, as they have already rejected the opportunity to continue the employment relationship with the new employer.

Conditions for Right of Priority in Cases of Surplus Labor

To assert the right of priority under § 14-2 (in cases of surplus labor), the following conditions must be met:

Seniority Requirement

The employee must have been employed in the company for a total of at least 12 months within the last two years. Continuous employment is not required, and the notice period is counted.

Qualification Requirement

The employee must be qualified for the position. This means having the necessary professional and personal qualifications to fill the position. In Rt. 2003 p. 1754 (Researcher), the Supreme Court established that personal attributes that affect the working environment can also be considered. However, it is not required that the employee is the best qualified - it is sufficient that the individual has qualifications at a level that is normal for the position.

New Employment in the Same Company

The right of priority applies only to "new employment" in the "same company". This includes both permanent and temporary employment, but not internal relocations. What constitutes the "same company" follows the concept of business in the Working Environment Act, which is initially linked to the legal entity, but in special cases may encompass multiple legal entities in a group.

Time Limitation

The right of priority applies from the point of dismissal and for one year from the expiry of the notice period. For temporary employees, the right of priority applies from the time of written notice of resignation and for one year after resignation.

Special Rules for Part-time Employees

The right of priority for part-time employees has some specific conditions and limitations:

No Seniority Requirement

Unlike in cases of surplus labor, there is no requirement for a minimum period of employment for a part-time employee to have the right of priority.

Positions of the Same Nature

The right of priority primarily applies to positions with "approximately the same tasks" as those the part-time employee is already performing, even if the qualification requirement itself would make the employee suitable for other tasks.

Part of a Position

According to a clarification in the law (§ 14-3 first paragraph second sentence), the right of priority may also be asserted for part of an advertised position. This followed HR-2016-867-A (Specialized Nurse), where the Supreme Court majority initially reached the opposite result.

Significant Disadvantage Exception

The right of priority for part-time employees cannot be asserted if it would involve a "significant disadvantage" for the company. This is to be interpreted strictly and is intended as a safety valve. Examples of significant disadvantages may include:

  • The need for more employees to cover weekend work without breaking rest period rules

  • Difficulties in recruiting for a remaining partial position

  • That the division of the position results in more, not fewer, part-time employees

Duty to Discuss

The employer shall discuss the right of priority issue with the part-time employee before making a decision, "as far as practicable". This duty is to be interpreted strictly, primarily based on circumstances on the employee's side that may justify exceptions.

Right of Priority in Case of Bankruptcy and Business Transfer

In Case of Bankruptcy

The right of priority rules also apply when employees are dismissed in connection with bankruptcy, but only when the business continues or resumes, and considering location, nature, and scope, it can be seen as a continuation of the original business. Relevant factors in the assessment are:

  • Whether it is the same real management

  • Whether the same employees are offered positions

  • Similarities in company names

  • Similarity in production methods

  • Whether the inventory has been taken over

The reorganization must take place within the one-year timeframe, and the business cannot have been stopped for more than one year.

In Case of Business Transfer

Employees who have exercised the right of reservation during a business transfer have the right of priority for new employment in the transferring business for one year from the date of transfer. The same conditions regarding seniority and qualifications as in cases of surplus labor apply.

Legal Consequences of Violating the Right of Priority

If a person entitled to priority has not been hired in violation of the rules, the consequences can be extensive:

Court Order for Employment

The main rule is that the court, at the request of the person entitled to priority, shall issue a judgment for employment in the position. This does not apply if it would be "unreasonable". The fact that another person is already employed in the position is not sufficient in itself to make it unreasonable, but can be a factor in the consideration along with:

  • How much time has passed since the hiring

  • The current situation of the employee

  • Whether a situation of surplus labor will arise

Compensation

The employee can claim compensation for both economic and non-economic loss (redress). The compensation is determined according to the same principles as for unjust termination of the employment relationship.

Practical Recommendations for Employers

To avoid disputes and potential liability, employers should establish good procedures for handling the right of priority rules:

Identify Those Entitled to Priority

  • Keep track of former employees with the right of priority and when it expires

  • Identify part-time employees who may want to extend their positions

  • Always check those entitled to priority before advertising positions

Assessment of Qualifications

  • Document the assessment of whether those entitled to priority are qualified for the position

  • If refusing due to lack of qualifications, ensure this is factually justified

  • For part-time positions, assess and document whether the right of priority would cause "significant disadvantage"

Communication

  • Inform those entitled to priority about vacant positions

  • Conduct legally required discussions with part-time employees before making a decision

  • Provide clear information about the acceptance deadline (14 days) when offering a position

When Priorities Clash

  • Follow the statutory order of precedence between different categories

  • When there are multiple persons entitled to priority within the same category, ensure fair selection

  • Document the assessments made

Conclusion

The right of priority rules constitute an important limitation on the employer's freedom of choice in recruitment. The rules are intended to ensure that certain groups of employees are prioritized in new recruitments, and violations can lead to both court orders for employment and liability for compensation. By having good routines for identifying those entitled to priority, assessing qualifications on a factual basis, and ensuring good communication, employers can both safeguard the rights of those entitled to priority and reduce the risk of costly disputes.

Sterk Law Firm

Your Partner for a Well-Functioning Workplace

Your Partner for a Well-Functioning Workplace

Your Partner for a Well-Functioning Workplace

Employment law challenges can be complex and time-consuming, whether you are a business leader or an employee. The consequences of incorrect handling can be significant, both in human and economic terms. Our lawyers have extensive experience from various aspects of working life and broad expertise in all areas of employment law. We can therefore offer precise advice and support throughout the process, allowing you to focus on your core business.

Employment law challenges can be complex and time-consuming, whether you are a business leader or an employee. The consequences of incorrect handling can be significant, both in human and economic terms. Our lawyers have extensive experience from various aspects of working life and broad expertise in all areas of employment law. We can therefore offer precise advice and support throughout the process, allowing you to focus on your core business.

Employment law challenges can be complex and time-consuming, whether you are a business leader or an employee. The consequences of incorrect handling can be significant, both in human and economic terms. Our lawyers have extensive experience from various aspects of working life and broad expertise in all areas of employment law. We can therefore offer precise advice and support throughout the process, allowing you to focus on your core business.

Advokatfirmaet Sterk
Advokatfirmaet Sterk
Advokatfirmaet Sterk

Comprehensive Employment Law Assistance

Comprehensive Employment Law Assistance

Comprehensive Employment Law Assistance

Explore

More articles

Invalidity and Compensation for Wrongful Termination of Employment in Norwegian Law

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Invalidity and compensation for unjust dismissal or termination. In blog posts, emphasize that it pertains to Norwegian law.

In cases of wrongful termination or unjust dismissal, the court shall generally rule that the termination is invalid, allowing the employee to continue in or be reinstated to their position. Even if the position has been filled by another, the employee is entitled to at least an equivalent position. In exceptional cases, the court may nonetheless decide that the employment relationship should end. Additionally, the employee may claim compensation for financial losses and reparation, where the assessment is based on a broad consideration of fairness with emphasis on the parties' conditions and other relevant circumstances.

Invalidity and Compensation for Wrongful Termination of Employment in Norwegian Law

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Invalidity and compensation for unjust dismissal or termination. In blog posts, emphasize that it pertains to Norwegian law.

In cases of wrongful termination or unjust dismissal, the court shall generally rule that the termination is invalid, allowing the employee to continue in or be reinstated to their position. Even if the position has been filled by another, the employee is entitled to at least an equivalent position. In exceptional cases, the court may nonetheless decide that the employment relationship should end. Additionally, the employee may claim compensation for financial losses and reparation, where the assessment is based on a broad consideration of fairness with emphasis on the parties' conditions and other relevant circumstances.

Invalidity and Compensation for Wrongful Termination of Employment in Norwegian Law

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Invalidity and compensation for unjust dismissal or termination. In blog posts, emphasize that it pertains to Norwegian law.

In cases of wrongful termination or unjust dismissal, the court shall generally rule that the termination is invalid, allowing the employee to continue in or be reinstated to their position. Even if the position has been filled by another, the employee is entitled to at least an equivalent position. In exceptional cases, the court may nonetheless decide that the employment relationship should end. Additionally, the employee may claim compensation for financial losses and reparation, where the assessment is based on a broad consideration of fairness with emphasis on the parties' conditions and other relevant circumstances.

Procedural rules for disputes concerning the termination of employment: Negotiations, deadlines, and the right to remain in position

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Employment Law: Disputes about Termination and Dismissal

In the event of a dispute concerning termination or dismissal, specific procedural rules apply. The employee has the right to request negotiations within two weeks, and the employer is obliged to conduct a negotiation meeting within two weeks of receiving the request. In the case of termination, the employee is entitled to remain in their position while the dispute is ongoing, but the employer can demand resignation if continuation is unreasonable. The deadline for filing a lawsuit to contest the legality of the termination is eight weeks, and six months for pure compensation claims. Formal errors in the termination result in the annulment of the lawsuit deadline.

Procedural rules for disputes concerning the termination of employment: Negotiations, deadlines, and the right to remain in position

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Employment Law: Disputes about Termination and Dismissal

In the event of a dispute concerning termination or dismissal, specific procedural rules apply. The employee has the right to request negotiations within two weeks, and the employer is obliged to conduct a negotiation meeting within two weeks of receiving the request. In the case of termination, the employee is entitled to remain in their position while the dispute is ongoing, but the employer can demand resignation if continuation is unreasonable. The deadline for filing a lawsuit to contest the legality of the termination is eight weeks, and six months for pure compensation claims. Formal errors in the termination result in the annulment of the lawsuit deadline.

Procedural rules for disputes concerning the termination of employment: Negotiations, deadlines, and the right to remain in position

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Employment Law: Disputes about Termination and Dismissal

In the event of a dispute concerning termination or dismissal, specific procedural rules apply. The employee has the right to request negotiations within two weeks, and the employer is obliged to conduct a negotiation meeting within two weeks of receiving the request. In the case of termination, the employee is entitled to remain in their position while the dispute is ongoing, but the employer can demand resignation if continuation is unreasonable. The deadline for filing a lawsuit to contest the legality of the termination is eight weeks, and six months for pure compensation claims. Formal errors in the termination result in the annulment of the lawsuit deadline.

The Employee's Right to Terminate the Employment Contract: Terms and Consequences

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Employee's Right to Terminate the Employment Contract – Conditions, Legal Effects, and Burden of Proof

The employee's right to termination involves the ability to immediately end the employment relationship due to the employer's substantial breach. This right is not codified in the Working Environment Act but derives from general contractual principles. Typical reasons for termination include non-payment of wages, harassment, or serious violations of safety regulations. The Supreme Court in the Stryn Pharmacy case has established that the threshold is high, particularly concerning psychosocial work environment issues. In the event of rightful termination, the employee may claim compensation for financial loss.

The Employee's Right to Terminate the Employment Contract: Terms and Consequences

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Employee's Right to Terminate the Employment Contract – Conditions, Legal Effects, and Burden of Proof

The employee's right to termination involves the ability to immediately end the employment relationship due to the employer's substantial breach. This right is not codified in the Working Environment Act but derives from general contractual principles. Typical reasons for termination include non-payment of wages, harassment, or serious violations of safety regulations. The Supreme Court in the Stryn Pharmacy case has established that the threshold is high, particularly concerning psychosocial work environment issues. In the event of rightful termination, the employee may claim compensation for financial loss.

The Employee's Right to Terminate the Employment Contract: Terms and Consequences

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Employee's Right to Terminate the Employment Contract – Conditions, Legal Effects, and Burden of Proof

The employee's right to termination involves the ability to immediately end the employment relationship due to the employer's substantial breach. This right is not codified in the Working Environment Act but derives from general contractual principles. Typical reasons for termination include non-payment of wages, harassment, or serious violations of safety regulations. The Supreme Court in the Stryn Pharmacy case has established that the threshold is high, particularly concerning psychosocial work environment issues. In the event of rightful termination, the employee may claim compensation for financial loss.

Dismissal in Employment Relationships: Legal Conditions and Overall Assessment

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Dismissal in Employment Relationships – Conditions, Process, and Case Law

Dismissal represents the employer's right to terminate the employment contract immediately in the event of gross misconduct or significant breach by the employee. The threshold is very high, and a thorough overall assessment is required, with emphasis placed on the seriousness of the act, the employee's fault, and the circumstances of the business. The dismissal must not appear as a disproportionate reaction, and case law shows that the employer's own handling of the situation often carries great weight. The procedural rules mainly correspond to the rules for termination.

Dismissal in Employment Relationships: Legal Conditions and Overall Assessment

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Dismissal in Employment Relationships – Conditions, Process, and Case Law

Dismissal represents the employer's right to terminate the employment contract immediately in the event of gross misconduct or significant breach by the employee. The threshold is very high, and a thorough overall assessment is required, with emphasis placed on the seriousness of the act, the employee's fault, and the circumstances of the business. The dismissal must not appear as a disproportionate reaction, and case law shows that the employer's own handling of the situation often carries great weight. The procedural rules mainly correspond to the rules for termination.

Dismissal in Employment Relationships: Legal Conditions and Overall Assessment

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Dismissal in Employment Relationships – Conditions, Process, and Case Law

Dismissal represents the employer's right to terminate the employment contract immediately in the event of gross misconduct or significant breach by the employee. The threshold is very high, and a thorough overall assessment is required, with emphasis placed on the seriousness of the act, the employee's fault, and the circumstances of the business. The dismissal must not appear as a disproportionate reaction, and case law shows that the employer's own handling of the situation often carries great weight. The procedural rules mainly correspond to the rules for termination.

Contact us

Contact Sterk Law Firm for legal assistance and advice. Our dedicated team of experienced lawyers is ready to find tailored solutions for your specific challenges.

Portrait of a man in a suit with arms crossed, in front of a graphic background – expressing professionalism and confidence
Portrait of a man in a suit with arms crossed, in front of a graphic background – expressing professionalism and confidence

By submitting this form, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.