Apr 8, 2025

Recruitment Clauses – Prohibitions, Exceptions, and Rules in Business Transfers

Recruitment Clauses in the Workplace: Prohibition, Exceptions, and Application
Recruitment Clauses in the Workplace: Prohibition, Exceptions, and Application
Recruitment Clauses in the Workplace: Prohibition, Exceptions, and Application

Recruitment clauses are a type of restrictive agreement that differ from non-compete and customer clauses in that the employee themselves is not a party to the agreement. These clauses are regulated by the Working Environment Act, chapter 14 A, which mainly prohibits such agreements, but with certain exceptions related to business transfers. This article explains what recruitment clauses are, why they are generally prohibited, and in which limited cases they can nevertheless be applied.

Definition of Recruitment Clauses

Recruitment clauses can generally be described as agreements that restrict the parties' access to recruit each other's colleagues or employees. There are essentially two types of recruitment clauses:

  1. Agreements between employer and employee that the employee shall not assist other employees in terminating their employment relationship with the employer

  2. Agreements between two businesses that they shall not hire, or attempt to hire, each other's employees

The regulation by the Working Environment Act is limited to the second type. The law defines a recruitment clause as an "agreement between employer and other businesses that prevents or restricts the employee's opportunities to take employment in another business" (§ 14 A-6 (1)).

For an agreement to be considered a recruitment clause under the Working Environment Act, three criteria must be met:

  1. Party relationship: The agreement must be made between "employer and other businesses". At least one of the parties must be an employer with its own employees.

  2. Restrictive effect: The agreement must "prevent or restrict" the employee's opportunities. This includes both direct prohibitions on recruitment and agreements that through other mechanisms (e.g., remuneration clauses) in reality have the same effect.

  3. Employment in another business: The restriction must apply to the employee's opportunity to take "employment in another business".

Main Rule: Prohibition of Recruitment Clauses

The Working Environment Act § 14 A-6 (2) first sentence sets out a general prohibition on recruitment clauses. This prohibition is justified by several considerations:

  1. It is considered principally unfortunate that agreements restrict employees' access to change jobs without employees themselves being parties to the agreement

  2. The prohibition is intended to contribute to ensuring mobility in the labor market

  3. The regulation is intended to counteract circumvention of the rules on non-compete and customer clauses

Employees should be able to utilize their competence and ability to work without being bound by agreements that they themselves have not entered into. Recruitment clauses could otherwise constitute significant obstacles to employees' career development and wage progression.

Exceptions to the Prohibition: Business Transfers

The law sets out two important exceptions to the prohibition on recruitment clauses, both related to business transfers:

1. Negotiations on Business Transfer

Recruitment clauses can be agreed and made applicable in connection with "negotiations" on business transfer (§ 14 A-6 (2) second sentence). This is because the parties in such negotiations often give each other access to sensitive information, including information about key employees.

For this exception to apply, there must be:

  • Genuine plans to carry out a business transfer

  • The negotiations must have progressed to the point where the businesses give each other access to documents and information that outsiders normally do not have access to

The recruitment clause can be made applicable as long as real negotiations are ongoing, until:

  • The negotiations break down, or

  • The negotiations lead to a business transfer

If the negotiations break down, the recruitment clause can still be made applicable for an additional six months after the negotiations have been concluded.

2. Implementation of Business Transfer

Recruitment clauses can also be made applicable in connection with the actual implementation of a business transfer (§ 14 A-6 (2) third sentence). Such clauses can be entered into at the time of the business transfer and made applicable for up to six months.

The purpose of this exception is to give the acquiring business time and opportunity to:

  • Utilize what has been acquired, including employees and knowhow

  • Secure knowledge about the company

  • Maintain customer and business relations

For a recruitment clause to be made applicable in the implementation of a business transfer, the employer must have informed the employees affected by the clause in writing (§ 14 A-6 (2) last sentence).

It is important to note that a recruitment clause must yield to the employee's rights under the Working Environment Act § 16-3 (right of reservation) and the unwritten right of choice. In other words, employees retain their statutory rights in business transfers regardless of any recruitment clause.

Practical Consequences and Limitations

When applying recruitment clauses in the cases where this is allowed, it is important to be aware of the following limitations:

  1. Time Limitation: Upon the breakdown of negotiations, the clause can only apply for six months after the negotiations have concluded. Upon a completed business transfer, the clause can only apply for six months from the transfer.

  2. Information Obligation: The affected employees must be informed in writing about the recruitment clause. The considerations behind the information obligation imply that it is irrelevant who provides this information, as long as it is given.

  3. Relation to Employee's Rights: Recruitment clauses cannot override employees' statutory rights in business transfers.

Conclusion

Recruitment clauses are in principle prohibited under Norwegian law, but can be used in specific situations related to business transfers. The regulations balance the consideration for businesses' needs to protect sensitive information and investments in connection with business transfers against the consideration for employees' freedom in the job market.

For businesses considering entering into such agreements, it is important to understand both the main rule of prohibition and the narrow exceptions that exist, as well as the formal requirements needed for the exceptions to be applicable.

Sterk Law Firm

Your Partner for a Well-Functioning Workplace

Your Partner for a Well-Functioning Workplace

Your Partner for a Well-Functioning Workplace

Employment law challenges can be complex and time-consuming, whether you are a business leader or an employee. The consequences of incorrect handling can be significant, both in human and economic terms. Our lawyers have extensive experience from various aspects of working life and broad expertise in all areas of employment law. We can therefore offer precise advice and support throughout the process, allowing you to focus on your core business.

Employment law challenges can be complex and time-consuming, whether you are a business leader or an employee. The consequences of incorrect handling can be significant, both in human and economic terms. Our lawyers have extensive experience from various aspects of working life and broad expertise in all areas of employment law. We can therefore offer precise advice and support throughout the process, allowing you to focus on your core business.

Employment law challenges can be complex and time-consuming, whether you are a business leader or an employee. The consequences of incorrect handling can be significant, both in human and economic terms. Our lawyers have extensive experience from various aspects of working life and broad expertise in all areas of employment law. We can therefore offer precise advice and support throughout the process, allowing you to focus on your core business.

Advokatfirmaet Sterk
Advokatfirmaet Sterk
Advokatfirmaet Sterk

Comprehensive Employment Law Assistance

Comprehensive Employment Law Assistance

Comprehensive Employment Law Assistance

Explore

More articles

Invalidity and Compensation for Wrongful Termination of Employment in Norwegian Law

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Invalidity and compensation for unjust dismissal or termination. In blog posts, emphasize that it pertains to Norwegian law.

In cases of wrongful termination or unjust dismissal, the court shall generally rule that the termination is invalid, allowing the employee to continue in or be reinstated to their position. Even if the position has been filled by another, the employee is entitled to at least an equivalent position. In exceptional cases, the court may nonetheless decide that the employment relationship should end. Additionally, the employee may claim compensation for financial losses and reparation, where the assessment is based on a broad consideration of fairness with emphasis on the parties' conditions and other relevant circumstances.

Invalidity and Compensation for Wrongful Termination of Employment in Norwegian Law

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Invalidity and compensation for unjust dismissal or termination. In blog posts, emphasize that it pertains to Norwegian law.

In cases of wrongful termination or unjust dismissal, the court shall generally rule that the termination is invalid, allowing the employee to continue in or be reinstated to their position. Even if the position has been filled by another, the employee is entitled to at least an equivalent position. In exceptional cases, the court may nonetheless decide that the employment relationship should end. Additionally, the employee may claim compensation for financial losses and reparation, where the assessment is based on a broad consideration of fairness with emphasis on the parties' conditions and other relevant circumstances.

Invalidity and Compensation for Wrongful Termination of Employment in Norwegian Law

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Invalidity and compensation for unjust dismissal or termination. In blog posts, emphasize that it pertains to Norwegian law.

In cases of wrongful termination or unjust dismissal, the court shall generally rule that the termination is invalid, allowing the employee to continue in or be reinstated to their position. Even if the position has been filled by another, the employee is entitled to at least an equivalent position. In exceptional cases, the court may nonetheless decide that the employment relationship should end. Additionally, the employee may claim compensation for financial losses and reparation, where the assessment is based on a broad consideration of fairness with emphasis on the parties' conditions and other relevant circumstances.

Procedural rules for disputes concerning the termination of employment: Negotiations, deadlines, and the right to remain in position

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Employment Law: Disputes about Termination and Dismissal

In the event of a dispute concerning termination or dismissal, specific procedural rules apply. The employee has the right to request negotiations within two weeks, and the employer is obliged to conduct a negotiation meeting within two weeks of receiving the request. In the case of termination, the employee is entitled to remain in their position while the dispute is ongoing, but the employer can demand resignation if continuation is unreasonable. The deadline for filing a lawsuit to contest the legality of the termination is eight weeks, and six months for pure compensation claims. Formal errors in the termination result in the annulment of the lawsuit deadline.

Procedural rules for disputes concerning the termination of employment: Negotiations, deadlines, and the right to remain in position

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Employment Law: Disputes about Termination and Dismissal

In the event of a dispute concerning termination or dismissal, specific procedural rules apply. The employee has the right to request negotiations within two weeks, and the employer is obliged to conduct a negotiation meeting within two weeks of receiving the request. In the case of termination, the employee is entitled to remain in their position while the dispute is ongoing, but the employer can demand resignation if continuation is unreasonable. The deadline for filing a lawsuit to contest the legality of the termination is eight weeks, and six months for pure compensation claims. Formal errors in the termination result in the annulment of the lawsuit deadline.

Procedural rules for disputes concerning the termination of employment: Negotiations, deadlines, and the right to remain in position

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Employment Law: Disputes about Termination and Dismissal

In the event of a dispute concerning termination or dismissal, specific procedural rules apply. The employee has the right to request negotiations within two weeks, and the employer is obliged to conduct a negotiation meeting within two weeks of receiving the request. In the case of termination, the employee is entitled to remain in their position while the dispute is ongoing, but the employer can demand resignation if continuation is unreasonable. The deadline for filing a lawsuit to contest the legality of the termination is eight weeks, and six months for pure compensation claims. Formal errors in the termination result in the annulment of the lawsuit deadline.

The Employee's Right to Terminate the Employment Contract: Terms and Consequences

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Employee's Right to Terminate the Employment Contract – Conditions, Legal Effects, and Burden of Proof

The employee's right to termination involves the ability to immediately end the employment relationship due to the employer's substantial breach. This right is not codified in the Working Environment Act but derives from general contractual principles. Typical reasons for termination include non-payment of wages, harassment, or serious violations of safety regulations. The Supreme Court in the Stryn Pharmacy case has established that the threshold is high, particularly concerning psychosocial work environment issues. In the event of rightful termination, the employee may claim compensation for financial loss.

The Employee's Right to Terminate the Employment Contract: Terms and Consequences

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Employee's Right to Terminate the Employment Contract – Conditions, Legal Effects, and Burden of Proof

The employee's right to termination involves the ability to immediately end the employment relationship due to the employer's substantial breach. This right is not codified in the Working Environment Act but derives from general contractual principles. Typical reasons for termination include non-payment of wages, harassment, or serious violations of safety regulations. The Supreme Court in the Stryn Pharmacy case has established that the threshold is high, particularly concerning psychosocial work environment issues. In the event of rightful termination, the employee may claim compensation for financial loss.

The Employee's Right to Terminate the Employment Contract: Terms and Consequences

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Employee's Right to Terminate the Employment Contract – Conditions, Legal Effects, and Burden of Proof

The employee's right to termination involves the ability to immediately end the employment relationship due to the employer's substantial breach. This right is not codified in the Working Environment Act but derives from general contractual principles. Typical reasons for termination include non-payment of wages, harassment, or serious violations of safety regulations. The Supreme Court in the Stryn Pharmacy case has established that the threshold is high, particularly concerning psychosocial work environment issues. In the event of rightful termination, the employee may claim compensation for financial loss.

Dismissal in Employment Relationships: Legal Conditions and Overall Assessment

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Dismissal in Employment Relationships – Conditions, Process, and Case Law

Dismissal represents the employer's right to terminate the employment contract immediately in the event of gross misconduct or significant breach by the employee. The threshold is very high, and a thorough overall assessment is required, with emphasis placed on the seriousness of the act, the employee's fault, and the circumstances of the business. The dismissal must not appear as a disproportionate reaction, and case law shows that the employer's own handling of the situation often carries great weight. The procedural rules mainly correspond to the rules for termination.

Dismissal in Employment Relationships: Legal Conditions and Overall Assessment

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Dismissal in Employment Relationships – Conditions, Process, and Case Law

Dismissal represents the employer's right to terminate the employment contract immediately in the event of gross misconduct or significant breach by the employee. The threshold is very high, and a thorough overall assessment is required, with emphasis placed on the seriousness of the act, the employee's fault, and the circumstances of the business. The dismissal must not appear as a disproportionate reaction, and case law shows that the employer's own handling of the situation often carries great weight. The procedural rules mainly correspond to the rules for termination.

Dismissal in Employment Relationships: Legal Conditions and Overall Assessment

Employment Law

Apr 8, 2025

Dismissal in Employment Relationships – Conditions, Process, and Case Law

Dismissal represents the employer's right to terminate the employment contract immediately in the event of gross misconduct or significant breach by the employee. The threshold is very high, and a thorough overall assessment is required, with emphasis placed on the seriousness of the act, the employee's fault, and the circumstances of the business. The dismissal must not appear as a disproportionate reaction, and case law shows that the employer's own handling of the situation often carries great weight. The procedural rules mainly correspond to the rules for termination.

Contact us

Contact Sterk Law Firm for legal assistance and advice. Our dedicated team of experienced lawyers is ready to find tailored solutions for your specific challenges.

Portrait of a man in a suit with arms crossed, in front of a graphic background – expressing professionalism and confidence
Portrait of a man in a suit with arms crossed, in front of a graphic background – expressing professionalism and confidence

By submitting this form, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.