Apr 8, 2025

Responsible Companies in Norwegian Law – Capital Structure, Liability, and Transferability

General partnerships
General partnerships
General partnerships

General partnerships represent a distinct form of company in Norwegian law with unique characteristics that clearly distinguish them from joint stock companies. These companies are primarily characterized by the direct, unlimited, and joint liability the participants have for the company's obligations. This article highlights fundamental legal aspects of general partnerships, focusing on capital requirements, decision-making, transferability, and the partner's ownership rights.

Capital aspects in general partnerships

Absence of deposit requirement

Unlike joint stock companies, where the share capital must be at least 30,000 kroner, there is no statutory obligation in general partnerships for participants to make capital contributions or other efforts in the company. This is clearly stated in the Companies Act § 2-6 first paragraph. However, the law allows participants to agree on capital contributions among themselves.

Practical reality

Even though the law does not require capital contributions, it will often be necessary in practice for participants to contribute capital, labor, or other values for the company to carry out its business. This means that the main rule in practice often becomes the opposite of the law's starting point – contributions are usually necessary for the company to function.

Free disposal of company capital

A significant difference from joint stock companies is that there are no rules on the binding of company capital in general partnerships. This is related to the form of liability:

  • The participants are directly, unlimitedly, and jointly liable for the company's obligations (Companies Act § 1-2 first paragraph letter a, cf. §§ 1-1 first paragraph and 2-4 first paragraph)

  • In principle, all equity can be returned to the participants

  • Distributions can even be decided at the expense of the company's debts, without the company's creditors being able to oppose it

Creditor protection is thus not linked to the binding of capital in the company but to the participants' personal and unlimited liability.

Decision-making processes in general partnerships

Principle of unanimity

In general partnerships, the main rule is that decisions in the company's meeting require the consent of all participants. This principle of unanimity is enshrined in the Companies Act § 2-12 first paragraph and reflects the company's character as a partnership where participants have personal liability.

The principle of unanimity gives each participant a veto right against company decisions, which highlights the strong position each participant has in the company. This contrasts with joint stock companies, where decisions are normally made by majority vote.

Transferability of company shares

Main rule of non-transferability

A share in a general partnership is, as a default rule, not transferable. This is stated in the Companies Act § 2-28 first sentence. This limitation in transferability reflects that general partnerships are personal companies where the identity of the participants is considered a fundamental foundation for establishment.

The non-transferability is directly related to the form of liability – when participants have unlimited liability for the company's obligations, it is crucial who the other participants are, especially considering their financial solidity and personal qualities.

Consequences for the share's character as a financial right

While shares typically have value as transferable financial rights, this is not the case to the same extent for shares in general partnerships. The limited transferability means that the share's value is primarily linked to the participants' right to distributions from the company and not to the possibility of selling the share at a profit.

Alternatives to transferability

The law does not exclude that certificates of shares for a share in a general partnership can be issued, and it can be agreed that the share shall be transferable. Such agreements must be included in the partnership agreement and will represent an exception to the main rule.

Change of ownership on a basis other than transfer

Inheritance and spouse substitution

The same considerations that argue against transferability of shares also argue against change of ownership on other grounds:

  • A share in a general partnership cannot change ownership by inheritance without authorization in the partnership agreement

  • The other participants can exclude the heir or the estate (Companies Act § 2-31 first paragraph)

  • The same applies to the spouse who has taken over a deceased participant's share in connection with undivided estate, or who has received the share in a spouse substitution

Pledging and creditor seizures

Even though the share as a rule cannot be transferred, this is not in itself a hindrance to:

  • Voluntary pledging of the share (although there is a question of mortgage legal authorization)

  • Creditor seizures in the share - the company's and participants' individual creditors can seize the company share

  • Bankruptcy - both the company and the participants can be declared bankrupt or be subject to other insolvency proceedings

It is worth noting that the company is considered its own bankruptcy entity, with the consequence that company creditors have a priority over the company's assets compared to the participants' individual creditors.

Participant's ownership control

Control over the company's assets

The ownership control over the assets of a general partnership must be resolved by the rules governing the management of the company. It is the company – through the company's meeting – that exercises ownership control over each of the company's assets (e.g., use, sale, pledging).

Participants in general partnerships are prevented from controlling their shares in individual assets in their own interest. This does not differ significantly from the situation in joint stock companies, but the reasoning is more practically oriented – individual control would create insurmountable practical problems.

The relationship to individual authority under the Companies Act § 2-20

The participants' lack of right to control individual company assets does not conflict with the authority each participant has under the Companies Act § 2-20 to exercise ownership control. Important points here are:

  • The authority under § 2-20 is exercised as an organ for the company and in the company's interest

  • The authority is not limited to the participant's own shares in the company's assets

Control over net share

Although the participant cannot control the individual assets of the company, each participant has control over their claim for distributions from the company (net share). This is an independent asset that the participant can dispose of.

Mutual deduction right

A particular question that arises in connection with the participants' ownership control is whether each participant can demand that the company's assets primarily cover the company's obligations. This may become relevant in several situations:

  • When a participant is to be redeemed

  • When the company is to be dissolved

  • When the company is declared bankrupt

It is a settled law that each participant in a general partnership has such a mutual deduction right concerning the company's obligations. This right can also be asserted against the individual creditors of the other participants.

Comparison with joint stock companies

To understand the unique features of general partnerships, it is useful to compare them with joint stock companies:

Aspect

General partnership

Joint stock company

Capital contribution

No statutory requirement

Minimum share capital 30,000 kr

Liability

Direct, unlimited, joint

Limited to the share contribution

Capital binding

No rules on binding

Strict rules on bound capital

Decisions

Unanimity as a main rule

Majority decisions

Transferability

Not transferable as a main rule

Shares are freely transferable

Personal element

Strong personal element

Capitalist element

Conclusion

General partnerships are personal companies where the participants' unlimited liability for the company's obligations is the central characteristic. This liability influences all other aspects of the company form – from capital aspects and decision-making to transferability and ownership control.

The absence of statutory capital contributions and capital binding makes the company form flexible but also imposes significant financial responsibility on the participants. The principle of unanimity and the limitations on transferability underscore the personal element and mutual trust that must normally be present between participants.

For businesses where participants want close cooperation and are willing to take on personal responsibility, a general partnership can be a suitable company form. However, it requires careful considerations and a good understanding of the legal consequences that this company form entails.

Sterk Law Firm

Your Partner in Norwegian Corporate Law

Your Partner in Norwegian Corporate Law

Your Partner in Norwegian Corporate Law

The legal structure forms the framework for your business. The choice of structure, governance documents, and agreements will have significant impacts throughout the company's lifespan. Errors and deficiencies can lead to substantial consequences, both legally and financially. Therefore, it is crucial to have a competent business attorney by your side. At Sterk Law Firm, we have extensive experience advising companies and their owners. We are aware of the common pitfalls and know how to build a robust structure for the future. Whether you are establishing a new company, bringing in investors, executing a merger, or winding down operations, we can assist with tailored solutions. We see it as our duty to clarify what you can achieve and how various solutions will impact the company. Our advice is practical and business-oriented, with an eye for both legal and commercial aspects of the matter. We will be a sparring partner who challenges you when necessary, to ensure all possibilities are considered before a decision is made. As a permanent attorney, we can also assume the role of company secretary and become an integral part of the company's management. We assist with calling, minute-taking, and conducting general meetings and board meetings, as well as updating the share register and notifications to the Register of Business Enterprises. Most of our clients choose an ongoing advisory agreement so that we are available when the need arises. Others seek assistance for standalone transactions or projects. We tailor our offer to your needs and provide you with a predictable price based on a fixed hourly rate or unit price. Contact us today for a non-binding conversation!

The legal structure forms the framework for your business. The choice of structure, governance documents, and agreements will have significant impacts throughout the company's lifespan. Errors and deficiencies can lead to substantial consequences, both legally and financially. Therefore, it is crucial to have a competent business attorney by your side. At Sterk Law Firm, we have extensive experience advising companies and their owners. We are aware of the common pitfalls and know how to build a robust structure for the future. Whether you are establishing a new company, bringing in investors, executing a merger, or winding down operations, we can assist with tailored solutions. We see it as our duty to clarify what you can achieve and how various solutions will impact the company. Our advice is practical and business-oriented, with an eye for both legal and commercial aspects of the matter. We will be a sparring partner who challenges you when necessary, to ensure all possibilities are considered before a decision is made. As a permanent attorney, we can also assume the role of company secretary and become an integral part of the company's management. We assist with calling, minute-taking, and conducting general meetings and board meetings, as well as updating the share register and notifications to the Register of Business Enterprises. Most of our clients choose an ongoing advisory agreement so that we are available when the need arises. Others seek assistance for standalone transactions or projects. We tailor our offer to your needs and provide you with a predictable price based on a fixed hourly rate or unit price. Contact us today for a non-binding conversation!

The legal structure forms the framework for your business. The choice of structure, governance documents, and agreements will have significant impacts throughout the company's lifespan. Errors and deficiencies can lead to substantial consequences, both legally and financially. Therefore, it is crucial to have a competent business attorney by your side. At Sterk Law Firm, we have extensive experience advising companies and their owners. We are aware of the common pitfalls and know how to build a robust structure for the future. Whether you are establishing a new company, bringing in investors, executing a merger, or winding down operations, we can assist with tailored solutions. We see it as our duty to clarify what you can achieve and how various solutions will impact the company. Our advice is practical and business-oriented, with an eye for both legal and commercial aspects of the matter. We will be a sparring partner who challenges you when necessary, to ensure all possibilities are considered before a decision is made. As a permanent attorney, we can also assume the role of company secretary and become an integral part of the company's management. We assist with calling, minute-taking, and conducting general meetings and board meetings, as well as updating the share register and notifications to the Register of Business Enterprises. Most of our clients choose an ongoing advisory agreement so that we are available when the need arises. Others seek assistance for standalone transactions or projects. We tailor our offer to your needs and provide you with a predictable price based on a fixed hourly rate or unit price. Contact us today for a non-binding conversation!

Advokatfirmaet Sterk
Advokatfirmaet Sterk
Advokatfirmaet Sterk

We build strong corporate structures and safeguard your ownership interests

We build strong corporate structures and safeguard your ownership interests

We build strong corporate structures and safeguard your ownership interests

Explore

More articles

Tax implications of establishing a limited company and increasing share capital

Corporate Law

Apr 23, 2025

Tax implications of establishing a private limited company and increasing share capital

The establishment of a limited liability company and the increase of share capital have significant tax implications, particularly in the case of contributions in kind. For the shareholder, the contribution of assets is considered as a realization in exchange for shares, followed by a calculation of gains or losses. The value of the contribution usually becomes the shareholder's initial acquisition cost and is regarded as tax-deductible capital. For the company, contributions are not considered taxable income, and the company receives initial acquisition values corresponding to the market value of the contributed assets. The choice between issuing new shares or increasing the nominal value impacts the allowance base and the subsequent taxation of dividends and gains.

Tax implications of establishing a limited company and increasing share capital

Corporate Law

Apr 23, 2025

Tax implications of establishing a private limited company and increasing share capital

The establishment of a limited liability company and the increase of share capital have significant tax implications, particularly in the case of contributions in kind. For the shareholder, the contribution of assets is considered as a realization in exchange for shares, followed by a calculation of gains or losses. The value of the contribution usually becomes the shareholder's initial acquisition cost and is regarded as tax-deductible capital. For the company, contributions are not considered taxable income, and the company receives initial acquisition values corresponding to the market value of the contributed assets. The choice between issuing new shares or increasing the nominal value impacts the allowance base and the subsequent taxation of dividends and gains.

Tax implications of establishing a limited company and increasing share capital

Corporate Law

Apr 23, 2025

Tax implications of establishing a private limited company and increasing share capital

The establishment of a limited liability company and the increase of share capital have significant tax implications, particularly in the case of contributions in kind. For the shareholder, the contribution of assets is considered as a realization in exchange for shares, followed by a calculation of gains or losses. The value of the contribution usually becomes the shareholder's initial acquisition cost and is regarded as tax-deductible capital. For the company, contributions are not considered taxable income, and the company receives initial acquisition values corresponding to the market value of the contributed assets. The choice between issuing new shares or increasing the nominal value impacts the allowance base and the subsequent taxation of dividends and gains.

The Exemption Method in Norwegian Tax Law: Tax Exemption for Companies as Shareholders

Corporate Law

Apr 23, 2025

The Exemption Method: Tax Exemption for Companies in Norwegian Tax Law

The exemption method is a key scheme in Norwegian tax law that exempts companies from tax liability on dividends and share gains, intended to prevent chain taxation. The scheme encompasses both Norwegian and foreign companies, but with significant exceptions for income from companies in low-tax countries and portfolio investments outside the EEA. Even with the exemption method, companies must recognize three percent of received dividends as income, except for dividends within tax groups. The rules often require consideration of ownership interests, voting rights, and genuine establishment. RetryKA

The Exemption Method in Norwegian Tax Law: Tax Exemption for Companies as Shareholders

Corporate Law

Apr 23, 2025

The Exemption Method: Tax Exemption for Companies in Norwegian Tax Law

The exemption method is a key scheme in Norwegian tax law that exempts companies from tax liability on dividends and share gains, intended to prevent chain taxation. The scheme encompasses both Norwegian and foreign companies, but with significant exceptions for income from companies in low-tax countries and portfolio investments outside the EEA. Even with the exemption method, companies must recognize three percent of received dividends as income, except for dividends within tax groups. The rules often require consideration of ownership interests, voting rights, and genuine establishment. RetryKA

The Exemption Method in Norwegian Tax Law: Tax Exemption for Companies as Shareholders

Corporate Law

Apr 23, 2025

The Exemption Method: Tax Exemption for Companies in Norwegian Tax Law

The exemption method is a key scheme in Norwegian tax law that exempts companies from tax liability on dividends and share gains, intended to prevent chain taxation. The scheme encompasses both Norwegian and foreign companies, but with significant exceptions for income from companies in low-tax countries and portfolio investments outside the EEA. Even with the exemption method, companies must recognize three percent of received dividends as income, except for dividends within tax groups. The rules often require consideration of ownership interests, voting rights, and genuine establishment. RetryKA

Representation of Companies Outward: Authority, Credentials, and Binding Agreements

Corporate Law

Apr 8, 2025

Company Law: Competence, Authority, and Representation

The authority of company representatives to bind the company through agreements is governed by a dual set of rules. Internally, competence is limited by company law, the articles of association, and instructions, while externally, the authority is often broader. In limited liability companies, the board represents the company externally with unlimited signatory powers, while the managing director can bind the company in matters within the scope of daily management. Exceeding competence will generally not exempt the company from being bound if the counterparty acted in reasonable good faith. This protection of the counterparty is particularly strong for limited liability companies through the EU's Disclosure Directive. For general partnerships, the participants represent the company individually unless otherwise agreed, with similar authority rules as for limited liability companies. Good corporate governance presupposes clear division of competencies and open communication regarding the scope of representational rights.

Representation of Companies Outward: Authority, Credentials, and Binding Agreements

Corporate Law

Apr 8, 2025

Company Law: Competence, Authority, and Representation

The authority of company representatives to bind the company through agreements is governed by a dual set of rules. Internally, competence is limited by company law, the articles of association, and instructions, while externally, the authority is often broader. In limited liability companies, the board represents the company externally with unlimited signatory powers, while the managing director can bind the company in matters within the scope of daily management. Exceeding competence will generally not exempt the company from being bound if the counterparty acted in reasonable good faith. This protection of the counterparty is particularly strong for limited liability companies through the EU's Disclosure Directive. For general partnerships, the participants represent the company individually unless otherwise agreed, with similar authority rules as for limited liability companies. Good corporate governance presupposes clear division of competencies and open communication regarding the scope of representational rights.

Representation of Companies Outward: Authority, Credentials, and Binding Agreements

Corporate Law

Apr 8, 2025

Company Law: Competence, Authority, and Representation

The authority of company representatives to bind the company through agreements is governed by a dual set of rules. Internally, competence is limited by company law, the articles of association, and instructions, while externally, the authority is often broader. In limited liability companies, the board represents the company externally with unlimited signatory powers, while the managing director can bind the company in matters within the scope of daily management. Exceeding competence will generally not exempt the company from being bound if the counterparty acted in reasonable good faith. This protection of the counterparty is particularly strong for limited liability companies through the EU's Disclosure Directive. For general partnerships, the participants represent the company individually unless otherwise agreed, with similar authority rules as for limited liability companies. Good corporate governance presupposes clear division of competencies and open communication regarding the scope of representational rights.

Organization of a partnership: The role and authority of corporate bodies

Corporate Law

Apr 8, 2025

Organization of Partnerships – Function and Competence of Corporate Bodies

Responsible companies are characterized by a flexible organizational structure where the company meeting is the only mandatory body. The company meeting constitutes the highest authority of the company, and the basic principle is that all decisions require unanimity among the participants—a principle that directly corresponds with their unlimited and joint liability for company obligations. In companies without a board or managing director, each participant can perform actions that are a natural part of the ongoing operations. The company may also choose to have a board and managing director, who will then be responsible for the general management. The employees' right to representation is primarily safeguarded in the company meeting. The provisions of the Companies Act are largely flexible, allowing the organization of the company to be tailored according to the needs of the business and the desires of the participants.

Organization of a partnership: The role and authority of corporate bodies

Corporate Law

Apr 8, 2025

Organization of Partnerships – Function and Competence of Corporate Bodies

Responsible companies are characterized by a flexible organizational structure where the company meeting is the only mandatory body. The company meeting constitutes the highest authority of the company, and the basic principle is that all decisions require unanimity among the participants—a principle that directly corresponds with their unlimited and joint liability for company obligations. In companies without a board or managing director, each participant can perform actions that are a natural part of the ongoing operations. The company may also choose to have a board and managing director, who will then be responsible for the general management. The employees' right to representation is primarily safeguarded in the company meeting. The provisions of the Companies Act are largely flexible, allowing the organization of the company to be tailored according to the needs of the business and the desires of the participants.

Organization of a partnership: The role and authority of corporate bodies

Corporate Law

Apr 8, 2025

Organization of Partnerships – Function and Competence of Corporate Bodies

Responsible companies are characterized by a flexible organizational structure where the company meeting is the only mandatory body. The company meeting constitutes the highest authority of the company, and the basic principle is that all decisions require unanimity among the participants—a principle that directly corresponds with their unlimited and joint liability for company obligations. In companies without a board or managing director, each participant can perform actions that are a natural part of the ongoing operations. The company may also choose to have a board and managing director, who will then be responsible for the general management. The employees' right to representation is primarily safeguarded in the company meeting. The provisions of the Companies Act are largely flexible, allowing the organization of the company to be tailored according to the needs of the business and the desires of the participants.

Contact us

Contact Sterk Law Firm for legal assistance and advice. Our dedicated team of experienced lawyers is ready to find tailored solutions for your specific challenges.

Portrait of a man in a suit with arms crossed, in front of a graphic background – expressing professionalism and confidence
Portrait of a man in a suit with arms crossed, in front of a graphic background – expressing professionalism and confidence

By submitting this form, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.