Apr 15, 2025

Third-Party Contracts in Norwegian Law: When Outsiders Acquire Rights in Contractual Relationships

Third-Party Contracts in Norwegian Law: When Outsiders Acquire Rights in Contractual Relationships
Third-Party Contracts in Norwegian Law: When Outsiders Acquire Rights in Contractual Relationships
Third-Party Contracts in Norwegian Law: When Outsiders Acquire Rights in Contractual Relationships

A fundamental principle in contract law is that an agreement binds only the parties who have entered into it. However, this principle of subjective limitation of the contract has important exceptions, where third parties who are not originally part of the agreement can acquire rights or obligations. This article focuses on third-party agreements - contracts that give a third party an independent right to demand the fulfillment of a promise made between two other parties.

What is a third-party agreement?

A third-party agreement is a contract between two parties (A and B) that grants a third party (C) an independent right. The key aspect is that the third party is not a participant in the contract but nonetheless has the right to demand the contract's fulfillment directly from the promisor (A).

This differs from situations where the third party merely benefits incidentally from the contract, and from cases where the third party's claim depends on the promisee (B) asserting the claim. In a third-party agreement, the third party (C) has an independent claim that can be directly asserted against the promisor (A).

When do third-party agreements arise?

Third-party agreements can arise in many different contexts, both of minor and major economic significance:

  1. Small gifts or benefits: For instance, where A promises B to give a crate of wine to C.

  2. Indirect benefits: Of greater economic significance are third-party agreements where the promise involves an indirect benefit from the promisee to the third party, such as insurance in favor of the third party.

  3. Legally regulated cases: In some instances, legislation directly dictates that the third party shall have an independent right.

How to determine if the third party has an independent right?

Whether the third party has an independent right to assert the promise is not resolved in the contract law and must primarily depend on an interpretation of the agreement between the promisor (A) and the promisee (B). The issue becomes determining if the parties intended:

  • only the promisee (B) to demand performance from the promisor (A) on behalf of the third party (C), or

  • the third party (C) to have a direct right to demand the performance from the promisor (A) upon the due date.

There is possibly some presumption that the third party should have a direct right if the promisee has provided consideration to the promisor for the promise, but this should not be given too much emphasis.

Examples of third-party agreements in Norwegian law

Legally regulated third-party agreements

  1. Insurance of a third party's interest: In such insurance, the third party will have a direct claim against the insurance company (cf. Insurance Contracts Act §§ 7-1, 7-2, and 7-5).

  2. Direct claims in liability insurance: The injured party can assert a direct claim against the insurance company if the damage is covered by the tortfeasor's liability insurance (cf. Insurance Contracts Act § 7-6).

  3. Deposits: According to the Deposit Act, a person can deposit an amount owed if he does not know who the creditor is. Depositing gives the third party (creditor) an independent right to demand fulfillment (cf. Deposit Act § 4).

Unwritten third-party agreements

  1. Debt assumption: Under unwritten rules on debt assumption, the creditor (C) obtains a direct right to deal with the debt assumer (B) in the future, even though the creditor is not a party to the agreement. However, the creditor has no obligation to accept the debt assumer as a new debtor.

  2. Sponsorship agreements in sports: An athlete may have an independent right to demand a share of the sponsor's payouts under "personal" sponsorship agreements concluded between a sports organization and a sponsor.

When does the third party not obtain an independent right?

There are several situations where the third party does not obtain an independent right, even if the agreement between two parties involves them:

  1. Personal liability for mortgage debt: According to the Mortgage Act § 2-7, the mortgagee is not entitled to look to the buyer of the mortgaged property until the mortgagee has accepted a direct request to accept the buyer as a new debtor.

  2. Gift promises: If the promise involves a gift for the third party, as a general rule, the third party has no independent right to demand fulfillment.

  3. Bank deposits in another's name: The third party does not automatically gain an independent right to dispose of the account and withdraw the money (cf. Rt 1934 p. 161).

Limitations on third-party rights

Even when the third party has an independent right, this right is derived from and contingent upon the agreement between the promisor (A) and the promisee (B). This results in significant limitations:

  1. Invalidity: If the agreement between A and B is invalid, the third party's right is also nullified.

  2. Subsequent events: If subsequent events cause A not to be obligated to perform (fully) for B, this affects the third party's right.

  3. Amendment: The third party's right is abolished if A and B agree to amend the agreement.

When does the third party's right become irrevocable?

The general rule is that the third party does not obtain an irrevocable right merely because there is a third-party agreement. For the right to be irrevocable, special disposition criteria must be present:

  1. Independent promise to the third party: If the third party receives an independent promise directly from the promisor.

  2. Standing offer: If the agreement between A and B should be interpreted as a standing offer to C that he can accept.

  3. Legally regulated cases: In insurance relationships, there are rules ensuring that the third party's right is irrevocable (cf. Insurance Contracts Act § 15-2 second paragraph).

Practical significance

Third-party agreements have significant practical importance in Norwegian law. They make it possible to establish legal relationships where third parties gain rights without having to participate directly in the agreement. This simplifies many transactions and protects the interests of parties who would otherwise depend on others asserting claims on their behalf.

At the same time, it is important to remain aware of the limitations: Third-party rights are derived from the main agreement and can be affected by changes, invalidity, or amendments to it. To secure an irrevocable right for the third party, special terms often need to be added to the agreement.

Conclusion

Third-party agreements represent an important exception to the principle that contracts bind only the parties. Through such agreements, a third party can acquire independent rights based on agreements in which they are not a participant. This contributes to flexibility in contractual relationships and facilitates legal arrangements that would otherwise require more complex contract constructions.

Norwegian law recognizes third-party agreements both in legally regulated areas and on an unwritten basis, while also setting certain conditions for the third party to gain an independent and potentially irrevocable right.

Sterk Law Firm

Security through watertight agreements

Security through watertight agreements

Security through watertight agreements

Contracts form the framework for most binding relationships, whether in business or private life. A good contract creates predictability, allocates risk, and prevents conflicts. Inadequate contract regulation can, at worst, lead to prolonged disputes or significant financial losses. At Sterk Law Firm, you get a personal and pragmatic lawyer who understands your needs. We take the time to understand your business and industry so that we can tailor the terms to your purpose. At the same time, we pay attention to details and the "fine print" that can have major consequences. You can be assured that your rights and obligations are clearly and unambiguously set out. We have particular expertise in contracts related to construction, IT, commerce, real estate, and corporate matters. However, we also assist with more standalone agreements such as letters of intent, confidentiality agreements, leases, service agreements, and craftsmanship services. When necessary, we draw on the specialized expertise of our external partners. Most assignments begin with an assessment of the contract's purpose and the needs of the parties. We then review any drafts or offers from the counterparty and provide an evaluation of which terms should be included, amended, or removed. If desired, we can also draft the entire contract from scratch. Along the way, we maintain close communication with you as a client, ensuring you always have control over the process. We offer both ongoing advice and assistance with individual contracts. Our goal is to create long-term client relationships, and many choose us as their regular contract partner. We offer competitive prices and can provide advantageous framework agreements for businesses. Contact us today to find out what we can do for your business or contractual situation!

Contracts form the framework for most binding relationships, whether in business or private life. A good contract creates predictability, allocates risk, and prevents conflicts. Inadequate contract regulation can, at worst, lead to prolonged disputes or significant financial losses. At Sterk Law Firm, you get a personal and pragmatic lawyer who understands your needs. We take the time to understand your business and industry so that we can tailor the terms to your purpose. At the same time, we pay attention to details and the "fine print" that can have major consequences. You can be assured that your rights and obligations are clearly and unambiguously set out. We have particular expertise in contracts related to construction, IT, commerce, real estate, and corporate matters. However, we also assist with more standalone agreements such as letters of intent, confidentiality agreements, leases, service agreements, and craftsmanship services. When necessary, we draw on the specialized expertise of our external partners. Most assignments begin with an assessment of the contract's purpose and the needs of the parties. We then review any drafts or offers from the counterparty and provide an evaluation of which terms should be included, amended, or removed. If desired, we can also draft the entire contract from scratch. Along the way, we maintain close communication with you as a client, ensuring you always have control over the process. We offer both ongoing advice and assistance with individual contracts. Our goal is to create long-term client relationships, and many choose us as their regular contract partner. We offer competitive prices and can provide advantageous framework agreements for businesses. Contact us today to find out what we can do for your business or contractual situation!

Contracts form the framework for most binding relationships, whether in business or private life. A good contract creates predictability, allocates risk, and prevents conflicts. Inadequate contract regulation can, at worst, lead to prolonged disputes or significant financial losses. At Sterk Law Firm, you get a personal and pragmatic lawyer who understands your needs. We take the time to understand your business and industry so that we can tailor the terms to your purpose. At the same time, we pay attention to details and the "fine print" that can have major consequences. You can be assured that your rights and obligations are clearly and unambiguously set out. We have particular expertise in contracts related to construction, IT, commerce, real estate, and corporate matters. However, we also assist with more standalone agreements such as letters of intent, confidentiality agreements, leases, service agreements, and craftsmanship services. When necessary, we draw on the specialized expertise of our external partners. Most assignments begin with an assessment of the contract's purpose and the needs of the parties. We then review any drafts or offers from the counterparty and provide an evaluation of which terms should be included, amended, or removed. If desired, we can also draft the entire contract from scratch. Along the way, we maintain close communication with you as a client, ensuring you always have control over the process. We offer both ongoing advice and assistance with individual contracts. Our goal is to create long-term client relationships, and many choose us as their regular contract partner. We offer competitive prices and can provide advantageous framework agreements for businesses. Contact us today to find out what we can do for your business or contractual situation!

Advokatfirmaet Sterk
Advokatfirmaet Sterk
Advokatfirmaet Sterk

We draft contracts that protect your interests

We draft contracts that protect your interests

We draft contracts that protect your interests

Explore

More articles

Interpretation Rules and Standard Contracts in Norwegian Contract Law

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Interpretation Rules and Standard Contracts in Norwegian Contract Law

Interpretation rules are unwritten principles that provide guidance when the interpretative factors do not indicate a specific outcome in contract interpretation. The rule of ambiguity, the most central interpretative rule in Norwegian law, implies that the contract is interpreted against the party who should have expressed themselves more clearly. The minimum rule suggests that the least burdensome alternative for the promisor is chosen. For standard contracts, special considerations apply, but recent case law shows that these are also interpreted according to general interpretative principles. Particularly for 'agreed documents,' decisive weight is given to the wording, while unilateral standard terms are more often interpreted restrictively in favor of the weaker party.

Interpretation Rules and Standard Contracts in Norwegian Contract Law

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Interpretation Rules and Standard Contracts in Norwegian Contract Law

Interpretation rules are unwritten principles that provide guidance when the interpretative factors do not indicate a specific outcome in contract interpretation. The rule of ambiguity, the most central interpretative rule in Norwegian law, implies that the contract is interpreted against the party who should have expressed themselves more clearly. The minimum rule suggests that the least burdensome alternative for the promisor is chosen. For standard contracts, special considerations apply, but recent case law shows that these are also interpreted according to general interpretative principles. Particularly for 'agreed documents,' decisive weight is given to the wording, while unilateral standard terms are more often interpreted restrictively in favor of the weaker party.

Interpretation Rules and Standard Contracts in Norwegian Contract Law

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Interpretation Rules and Standard Contracts in Norwegian Contract Law

Interpretation rules are unwritten principles that provide guidance when the interpretative factors do not indicate a specific outcome in contract interpretation. The rule of ambiguity, the most central interpretative rule in Norwegian law, implies that the contract is interpreted against the party who should have expressed themselves more clearly. The minimum rule suggests that the least burdensome alternative for the promisor is chosen. For standard contracts, special considerations apply, but recent case law shows that these are also interpreted according to general interpretative principles. Particularly for 'agreed documents,' decisive weight is given to the wording, while unilateral standard terms are more often interpreted restrictively in favor of the weaker party.

Contract Interpretation in Norwegian Law: Key Principles and Methods

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Contract Interpretation in Norwegian Law: Key Principles and Methods

Contract interpretation is a central aspect of contract law and concerns establishing the legal effects that an entered agreement has between the parties. In Norwegian law, the interpretation process primarily follows the objective interpretation principle but can be modified by the mutual understanding of the parties. In cases of unclear wording, the purpose of the agreement, the expectations of the parties, and genuine considerations are emphasized. Commercial agreements are interpreted particularly strictly according to their wording. In cases of persistent ambiguity, the agreement may be supplemented with solutions from background law. The good faith standard protects parties who had a legitimate expectation of how the agreement should be understood.

Contract Interpretation in Norwegian Law: Key Principles and Methods

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Contract Interpretation in Norwegian Law: Key Principles and Methods

Contract interpretation is a central aspect of contract law and concerns establishing the legal effects that an entered agreement has between the parties. In Norwegian law, the interpretation process primarily follows the objective interpretation principle but can be modified by the mutual understanding of the parties. In cases of unclear wording, the purpose of the agreement, the expectations of the parties, and genuine considerations are emphasized. Commercial agreements are interpreted particularly strictly according to their wording. In cases of persistent ambiguity, the agreement may be supplemented with solutions from background law. The good faith standard protects parties who had a legitimate expectation of how the agreement should be understood.

Contract Interpretation in Norwegian Law: Key Principles and Methods

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Contract Interpretation in Norwegian Law: Key Principles and Methods

Contract interpretation is a central aspect of contract law and concerns establishing the legal effects that an entered agreement has between the parties. In Norwegian law, the interpretation process primarily follows the objective interpretation principle but can be modified by the mutual understanding of the parties. In cases of unclear wording, the purpose of the agreement, the expectations of the parties, and genuine considerations are emphasized. Commercial agreements are interpreted particularly strictly according to their wording. In cases of persistent ambiguity, the agreement may be supplemented with solutions from background law. The good faith standard protects parties who had a legitimate expectation of how the agreement should be understood.

Approval of Invalid Dispositions: Ratification in Norwegian Contract Law

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Approval of Invalid Dispositions: Ratification in Norwegian Contract Law

Can an agreement that is initially invalid be subsequently ratified and thereby obtain legal effect? This article explains when an invalid disposition can be remedied through subsequent approval (ratification), what limitations apply to various grounds for invalidity, and how a bona fide co-contractor may oppose such ratification. A key aspect of contract law that balances the consideration of freedom of contract against the need to protect weaker parties.

Approval of Invalid Dispositions: Ratification in Norwegian Contract Law

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Approval of Invalid Dispositions: Ratification in Norwegian Contract Law

Can an agreement that is initially invalid be subsequently ratified and thereby obtain legal effect? This article explains when an invalid disposition can be remedied through subsequent approval (ratification), what limitations apply to various grounds for invalidity, and how a bona fide co-contractor may oppose such ratification. A key aspect of contract law that balances the consideration of freedom of contract against the need to protect weaker parties.

Approval of Invalid Dispositions: Ratification in Norwegian Contract Law

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Approval of Invalid Dispositions: Ratification in Norwegian Contract Law

Can an agreement that is initially invalid be subsequently ratified and thereby obtain legal effect? This article explains when an invalid disposition can be remedied through subsequent approval (ratification), what limitations apply to various grounds for invalidity, and how a bona fide co-contractor may oppose such ratification. A key aspect of contract law that balances the consideration of freedom of contract against the need to protect weaker parties.

Content Deficiencies in Agreements: Legal Overview and Consequences

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Content Deficiencies in Agreements: Legal Overview and Consequences

When is an agreement invalid due to its content? This article provides an overview of central rules regarding content defects, ranging from agreements about games and betting to the general leniency rule in the Contracts Act § 36. The article explains when courts may set aside or amend agreements with unreasonable content, and how consumers have special protection through the Contracts Act § 37. Key decisions from the Supreme Court illustrate how the rules operate in practice.

Content Deficiencies in Agreements: Legal Overview and Consequences

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Content Deficiencies in Agreements: Legal Overview and Consequences

When is an agreement invalid due to its content? This article provides an overview of central rules regarding content defects, ranging from agreements about games and betting to the general leniency rule in the Contracts Act § 36. The article explains when courts may set aside or amend agreements with unreasonable content, and how consumers have special protection through the Contracts Act § 37. Key decisions from the Supreme Court illustrate how the rules operate in practice.

Content Deficiencies in Agreements: Legal Overview and Consequences

Contracts

Apr 15, 2025

Content Deficiencies in Agreements: Legal Overview and Consequences

When is an agreement invalid due to its content? This article provides an overview of central rules regarding content defects, ranging from agreements about games and betting to the general leniency rule in the Contracts Act § 36. The article explains when courts may set aside or amend agreements with unreasonable content, and how consumers have special protection through the Contracts Act § 37. Key decisions from the Supreme Court illustrate how the rules operate in practice.

Contact us

Contact Sterk Law Firm for legal assistance and advice. Our dedicated team of experienced lawyers is ready to find tailored solutions for your specific challenges.

Portrait of a man in a suit with arms crossed, in front of a graphic background – expressing professionalism and confidence
Portrait of a man in a suit with arms crossed, in front of a graphic background – expressing professionalism and confidence

By submitting this form, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.