Apr 7, 2025

Transferability of Company Shares – Limited Liability Companies and Partnerships

Transferability of Company Shares: Legal Framework for Limited Liability Companies and General Partnerships
Transferability of Company Shares: Legal Framework for Limited Liability Companies and General Partnerships
Transferability of Company Shares: Legal Framework for Limited Liability Companies and General Partnerships

For participants in partnerships, economic gain from the investment can be achieved in two main ways: through regular distributions and a share in profits (returns), or by realizing a gain by relinquishing the position as an owner. This article focuses on the latter – the possibilities of selling or otherwise transferring a company share, with particular emphasis on the legal frameworks for transferability in both joint stock companies and general partnerships.

The question of the transferability of company shares is of great practical significance. For investors wanting to realize a gain on their investment, it is crucial that the share can be transferred quickly and at market price. At the same time, the company and other participants often have an interest in controlling who comes in as new owners. The legal frameworks for transferability balance these considerations differently for different company forms.

Joint Stock Companies and Public Limited Companies

Main Principles of Transferability

In joint stock company law, it has traditionally been a main principle that shares are freely transferable. This principle is based on the notion that the joint stock company, as an economic instrument, aims to allocate risk-willing capital, and this function assumes that investors have an opportunity to exit the corporate relationship.

For public limited companies, the principle of free transferability still applies as a main rule, cf. the Public Limited Companies Act section 4-15, first paragraph:

"Shares may change owners through transfer and otherwise unless otherwise determined by law, the company's articles of association, or agreement between shareholders."

This is natural since public limited companies typically raise capital from the public, and shares in public limited companies are often listed on the stock exchange. For listed companies, a stricter requirement for free transferability applies as a condition for listing, cf. the Securities Trading Act section 13-2 and the Securities Trading Regulation section 13-4, cf. section 13-2.

However, for joint stock companies, the legal status changed with the Joint Stock Companies Act of 1997. The main rule now is that the acquisition of a share requires consent from the company, unless it is specified in the articles of association that consent is not required, cf. the Joint Stock Companies Act section 4-15, second paragraph.

The legal basis for this change is the recognition that transferability cannot solely be considered as a question of the right to dispose of property rights. In practice, most smaller joint stock companies have various transfer restrictions in their articles of association, making them "closed" companies. The legislator considered that the main rule of the law should reflect this practice.

Consent Requirement and Refusal of Consent

In joint stock companies, the board holds the authority to grant consent, unless otherwise specified in the articles of association, cf. the Joint Stock Companies Act section 4-16, first paragraph. The board must address a consent application as soon as possible, and no later than two months after the company received notice of the acquisition. Otherwise, consent is considered granted.

Consent may only be refused when there are justifiable grounds, cf. the Joint Stock Companies Act section 4-16, second paragraph. The requirement for justifiability implies that the refusal must be justified in the interests of the company, not in extraneous considerations. Case law has recognized the following as justifiable grounds for refusal of consent:

  • Preventing competitors or others with "hostile" intentions from obtaining an ownership position and insight

  • Preventing a single shareholder from becoming too dominant in the company

  • Maintaining the company's distinct character, for instance, as a locally anchored company (Supreme Court Report 1999 p. 1682 Østlendingen)

In Supreme Court Report 2013 p. 241 (Stangeskovene), the Supreme Court emphasized that if one wishes to ensure widespread ownership, this should be indicated in the articles of association and practiced consistently with all shareholders.

Consequences of Refusal of Consent

Upon refusal of consent, the acquirer has four alternatives under the Joint Stock Companies Act section 4-17:

  1. Rescind the agreement with the transferor

  2. Transfer the share to another

  3. File a lawsuit over the validity of the refusal

  4. Demand the share be redeemed by the company

The redemption right is particularly important as a mechanism to prevent the share acquirer from being "locked in" with their investment. The company may only refuse redemption if it designates another buyer who is willing to take over the shares on the same terms, or if redemption would cause significant damage to the company's operations or be unreasonable to the company.

Upon redemption, the value of the share shall be set to the "real value" at the time the claim is made, cf. the Joint Stock Companies Act section 4-17, fifth paragraph. In Supreme Court Report 2007 p. 1392 (Flesberg), the Supreme Court held that this is generally the presumed market value, if there is sufficient basis to determine this.

Articles of Association with Personal Clauses

The Joint Stock Companies Act allows for requirements to be set in the articles of association that share acquirers and/or shareholders must have specific characteristics, cf. the Joint Stock Companies Act section 4-18. Such personal clauses can be:

  • Requirements for certain qualifications (residence, profession, education, family ties)

  • Requirements connected to other ownership relations

  • Quantitative ownership restrictions ("ownership ceilings")

If the acquirer does not meet the requirements in the personal clause, the board shall refuse the acquisition to be entered into the shareholder register. The acquirer then has three alternatives: rescind the agreement, transfer the shares, or file a lawsuit to determine whether the articles of association requirements are met.

Preemptive Rights

A further restriction on the free transferability of a share is the legal main rule of preemptive rights. According to the Joint Stock Companies Act section 4-19, first paragraph, shareholders have the right to take over a share that has changed owners unless something else is established in the articles of association.

The preemptive right is partly justified by the shareholders' need to control who becomes a shareholder and partly by the desire to maintain their proportional ownership stake in the company.

Following a legal change in 2006, the preemptive right is triggered only when the share has changed owners. Previously, it became effective even before the ownership change, which can still be established in the articles of association.

When exercising the preemptive right, all shares covered by the transfer must be redeemed, cf. the Joint Stock Companies Act section 4-21, third paragraph. This protects the acquirer from being left with a small, non-influential shareholding.

The redemption sum must be set to the shares' "real value", cf. the Joint Stock Companies Act section 4-23, second paragraph, following the same principles as for redemption after refusal of consent.

Company's Acquisition of its Own Shares

Joint stock and public limited companies have a limited ability to acquire their own shares (buyback). For joint stock companies, rules were liberalized in 2013, removing the previous restriction on 10% of the share capital. For public limited companies, the 10% restriction still applies.

Buybacks of shares must fulfill three statutory requirements:

  1. The share capital, less the repurchased shares, must not fall below the minimum allowable share capital

  2. The remuneration must lie within the limits of the funds the company could have distributed as a dividend

  3. The general meeting must have authorized the acquisition with a two-thirds majority

Share buybacks can be a useful instrument for ownership and generational changes, for acquiring asset values, or in companies where employees own shares as part of an incentive scheme.

General Partnerships

The Principle of Transfer Prohibition

In contrast to joint stock companies, the default rule for general partnerships is that a share cannot be transferred, cf. the Partnership Act section 2-28. This is because the personal qualities and creditworthiness of the participants are so important to the other participants that no one should be able to substitute another in their place without the consent of all other participants.

The background for this difference between company forms is the personal, unlimited, and joint responsibility for partnership obligations that participants in general partnerships have. This makes the identity of co-participants much more important than in joint stock companies, where liability is limited to the share capital.

The transfer prohibition applies to all forms of ownership transition to a new owner, including sale, exchange, gift, and inheritance. It also affects the splitting of a participant's share into "sub-shares" and the establishment of co-ownership in the share.

Possibilities for Transfer

Notwithstanding the main rule, the partnership agreement may provide that the transfer prohibition shall not apply, allowing free transfer of the share. This can be suitable in larger partnerships with many passive participants.

It can also be agreed that only certain types of transfers are permitted, for example, inheritance, while others, such as sales, require consent.

In the following special cases, there may be grounds to imply a right to transfer, even without an explicit agreement provision:

  1. Where the partnership share is purely a capital share without rights to participate in management

  2. Where the share is tied to a share certificate

  3. Where the partnership agreement stipulates that the share shall not be redeemable upon termination

Consequences of Transfer

In the case of a lawful transfer, the acquirer steps into all rights and obligations of the transferor towards the other participants, cf. the Partnership Act section 2-30, first paragraph. This includes:

  • Right to economic dividends

  • Right to participate in company meetings

  • Authority to bind the company by agreement

  • Obligations under the Partnership Act and partnership agreement

  • Liability for the company's debt

For the company's obligations existing at the time of the change of ownership, the transferor and the acquirer are jointly liable, cf. the Partnership Act section 2-30, second paragraph. This joint liability can be a significant burden for the transferor, who risks being liable for the company's debt long after the transfer.

To alleviate this situation, the Partnership Act section 2-30, third paragraph, provides the transferor an "interpellation right" towards the company's creditors. This means the transferor can ask the creditors to release them from liability and will be free if the creditor does not respond to the request within three months.

Withdrawal as an Alternative to Transfer

Since participants in general partnerships cannot freely sell their share, the Partnership Act section 2-32, first paragraph, gives participants a compensatory right to terminate their participation with six months written notice and demand to be redeemed from the company.

This withdrawal right is an important "exit opportunity" and differs from the legal situation in joint stock companies, where no general redemption right exists.

Upon withdrawal, the participant's involvement in the company relationship ends, while the shares of the remaining participants become proportionally larger. The company is obliged to pay the withdrawing participant a redemption amount, which shall be set at the value of the share at the end of the notice period, cf. the Partnership Act section 2-32, first paragraph, second sentence.

It's important to note that the remaining participants can generally counter a withdrawal claim with a demand for dissolution and liquidation of the company. However, in practice, the remaining participants often wish to continue the partnership, making the withdrawal right a real alternative to transfer.

Conclusion

The rules on transferability of company shares reflect the fundamental differences between company forms. In joint stock companies, where responsibility is limited, the starting point is a conditional transferability with a consent requirement, but with the possibility of redemption as a safety valve. In general partnerships, with unlimited liability, the starting point is a transfer prohibition, compensated by a withdrawal right.

For potential investors and company participants, it is crucial to be aware of these differences. The choice of company form directly affects the ability to realize the investment through sale, and thus the liquidity and risk associated with the investment. At the same time, one must be aware of the possibilities to adjust the transferability rules through articles of association or partnership agreements.

Sterk Law Firm

Your Partner in Norwegian Corporate Law

Your Partner in Norwegian Corporate Law

Your Partner in Norwegian Corporate Law

The legal structure forms the framework for your business. The choice of structure, governance documents, and agreements will have significant impacts throughout the company's lifespan. Errors and deficiencies can lead to substantial consequences, both legally and financially. Therefore, it is crucial to have a competent business attorney by your side. At Sterk Law Firm, we have extensive experience advising companies and their owners. We are aware of the common pitfalls and know how to build a robust structure for the future. Whether you are establishing a new company, bringing in investors, executing a merger, or winding down operations, we can assist with tailored solutions. We see it as our duty to clarify what you can achieve and how various solutions will impact the company. Our advice is practical and business-oriented, with an eye for both legal and commercial aspects of the matter. We will be a sparring partner who challenges you when necessary, to ensure all possibilities are considered before a decision is made. As a permanent attorney, we can also assume the role of company secretary and become an integral part of the company's management. We assist with calling, minute-taking, and conducting general meetings and board meetings, as well as updating the share register and notifications to the Register of Business Enterprises. Most of our clients choose an ongoing advisory agreement so that we are available when the need arises. Others seek assistance for standalone transactions or projects. We tailor our offer to your needs and provide you with a predictable price based on a fixed hourly rate or unit price. Contact us today for a non-binding conversation!

The legal structure forms the framework for your business. The choice of structure, governance documents, and agreements will have significant impacts throughout the company's lifespan. Errors and deficiencies can lead to substantial consequences, both legally and financially. Therefore, it is crucial to have a competent business attorney by your side. At Sterk Law Firm, we have extensive experience advising companies and their owners. We are aware of the common pitfalls and know how to build a robust structure for the future. Whether you are establishing a new company, bringing in investors, executing a merger, or winding down operations, we can assist with tailored solutions. We see it as our duty to clarify what you can achieve and how various solutions will impact the company. Our advice is practical and business-oriented, with an eye for both legal and commercial aspects of the matter. We will be a sparring partner who challenges you when necessary, to ensure all possibilities are considered before a decision is made. As a permanent attorney, we can also assume the role of company secretary and become an integral part of the company's management. We assist with calling, minute-taking, and conducting general meetings and board meetings, as well as updating the share register and notifications to the Register of Business Enterprises. Most of our clients choose an ongoing advisory agreement so that we are available when the need arises. Others seek assistance for standalone transactions or projects. We tailor our offer to your needs and provide you with a predictable price based on a fixed hourly rate or unit price. Contact us today for a non-binding conversation!

The legal structure forms the framework for your business. The choice of structure, governance documents, and agreements will have significant impacts throughout the company's lifespan. Errors and deficiencies can lead to substantial consequences, both legally and financially. Therefore, it is crucial to have a competent business attorney by your side. At Sterk Law Firm, we have extensive experience advising companies and their owners. We are aware of the common pitfalls and know how to build a robust structure for the future. Whether you are establishing a new company, bringing in investors, executing a merger, or winding down operations, we can assist with tailored solutions. We see it as our duty to clarify what you can achieve and how various solutions will impact the company. Our advice is practical and business-oriented, with an eye for both legal and commercial aspects of the matter. We will be a sparring partner who challenges you when necessary, to ensure all possibilities are considered before a decision is made. As a permanent attorney, we can also assume the role of company secretary and become an integral part of the company's management. We assist with calling, minute-taking, and conducting general meetings and board meetings, as well as updating the share register and notifications to the Register of Business Enterprises. Most of our clients choose an ongoing advisory agreement so that we are available when the need arises. Others seek assistance for standalone transactions or projects. We tailor our offer to your needs and provide you with a predictable price based on a fixed hourly rate or unit price. Contact us today for a non-binding conversation!

Advokatfirmaet Sterk
Advokatfirmaet Sterk
Advokatfirmaet Sterk

We build strong corporate structures and safeguard your ownership interests

We build strong corporate structures and safeguard your ownership interests

We build strong corporate structures and safeguard your ownership interests

Explore

More articles

Representation of Companies Outward: Authority, Credentials, and Binding Agreements

Corporate Law

Apr 8, 2025

Company Law: Competence, Authority, and Representation

The authority of company representatives to bind the company through agreements is governed by a dual set of rules. Internally, competence is limited by company law, the articles of association, and instructions, while externally, the authority is often broader. In limited liability companies, the board represents the company externally with unlimited signatory powers, while the managing director can bind the company in matters within the scope of daily management. Exceeding competence will generally not exempt the company from being bound if the counterparty acted in reasonable good faith. This protection of the counterparty is particularly strong for limited liability companies through the EU's Disclosure Directive. For general partnerships, the participants represent the company individually unless otherwise agreed, with similar authority rules as for limited liability companies. Good corporate governance presupposes clear division of competencies and open communication regarding the scope of representational rights.

Representation of Companies Outward: Authority, Credentials, and Binding Agreements

Corporate Law

Apr 8, 2025

Company Law: Competence, Authority, and Representation

The authority of company representatives to bind the company through agreements is governed by a dual set of rules. Internally, competence is limited by company law, the articles of association, and instructions, while externally, the authority is often broader. In limited liability companies, the board represents the company externally with unlimited signatory powers, while the managing director can bind the company in matters within the scope of daily management. Exceeding competence will generally not exempt the company from being bound if the counterparty acted in reasonable good faith. This protection of the counterparty is particularly strong for limited liability companies through the EU's Disclosure Directive. For general partnerships, the participants represent the company individually unless otherwise agreed, with similar authority rules as for limited liability companies. Good corporate governance presupposes clear division of competencies and open communication regarding the scope of representational rights.

Representation of Companies Outward: Authority, Credentials, and Binding Agreements

Corporate Law

Apr 8, 2025

Company Law: Competence, Authority, and Representation

The authority of company representatives to bind the company through agreements is governed by a dual set of rules. Internally, competence is limited by company law, the articles of association, and instructions, while externally, the authority is often broader. In limited liability companies, the board represents the company externally with unlimited signatory powers, while the managing director can bind the company in matters within the scope of daily management. Exceeding competence will generally not exempt the company from being bound if the counterparty acted in reasonable good faith. This protection of the counterparty is particularly strong for limited liability companies through the EU's Disclosure Directive. For general partnerships, the participants represent the company individually unless otherwise agreed, with similar authority rules as for limited liability companies. Good corporate governance presupposes clear division of competencies and open communication regarding the scope of representational rights.

Organization of a partnership: The role and authority of corporate bodies

Corporate Law

Apr 8, 2025

Organization of Partnerships – Function and Competence of Corporate Bodies

Responsible companies are characterized by a flexible organizational structure where the company meeting is the only mandatory body. The company meeting constitutes the highest authority of the company, and the basic principle is that all decisions require unanimity among the participants—a principle that directly corresponds with their unlimited and joint liability for company obligations. In companies without a board or managing director, each participant can perform actions that are a natural part of the ongoing operations. The company may also choose to have a board and managing director, who will then be responsible for the general management. The employees' right to representation is primarily safeguarded in the company meeting. The provisions of the Companies Act are largely flexible, allowing the organization of the company to be tailored according to the needs of the business and the desires of the participants.

Organization of a partnership: The role and authority of corporate bodies

Corporate Law

Apr 8, 2025

Organization of Partnerships – Function and Competence of Corporate Bodies

Responsible companies are characterized by a flexible organizational structure where the company meeting is the only mandatory body. The company meeting constitutes the highest authority of the company, and the basic principle is that all decisions require unanimity among the participants—a principle that directly corresponds with their unlimited and joint liability for company obligations. In companies without a board or managing director, each participant can perform actions that are a natural part of the ongoing operations. The company may also choose to have a board and managing director, who will then be responsible for the general management. The employees' right to representation is primarily safeguarded in the company meeting. The provisions of the Companies Act are largely flexible, allowing the organization of the company to be tailored according to the needs of the business and the desires of the participants.

Organization of a partnership: The role and authority of corporate bodies

Corporate Law

Apr 8, 2025

Organization of Partnerships – Function and Competence of Corporate Bodies

Responsible companies are characterized by a flexible organizational structure where the company meeting is the only mandatory body. The company meeting constitutes the highest authority of the company, and the basic principle is that all decisions require unanimity among the participants—a principle that directly corresponds with their unlimited and joint liability for company obligations. In companies without a board or managing director, each participant can perform actions that are a natural part of the ongoing operations. The company may also choose to have a board and managing director, who will then be responsible for the general management. The employees' right to representation is primarily safeguarded in the company meeting. The provisions of the Companies Act are largely flexible, allowing the organization of the company to be tailored according to the needs of the business and the desires of the participants.

The company’s organization and authority: Structuring decision-making powers and external representation

Corporate Law

Apr 8, 2025

Corporate Bodies in Limited Companies – Roles, Responsibilities, and Authority

Private limited companies and public limited companies are organized through a hierarchy of corporate bodies with defined roles and responsibilities. The general meeting is the company’s supreme body, where shareholders exercise their authority through majority resolutions. The board of directors manages the company’s general administration and represents the company externally, with extensive authority and responsibility for the company’s operations. The general manager, which is mandatory in public limited companies but optional in private limited companies, is responsible for the daily management under the board's direction. In companies with more than 200 employees, the corporate assembly is also mandatory, with specific decision-making authority in matters concerning investments and rationalizations. The interaction between these bodies is closely regulated by company law to ensure efficient management and the safeguarding of both ownership interests, employees' rights, and creditor protection.

The company’s organization and authority: Structuring decision-making powers and external representation

Corporate Law

Apr 8, 2025

Corporate Bodies in Limited Companies – Roles, Responsibilities, and Authority

Private limited companies and public limited companies are organized through a hierarchy of corporate bodies with defined roles and responsibilities. The general meeting is the company’s supreme body, where shareholders exercise their authority through majority resolutions. The board of directors manages the company’s general administration and represents the company externally, with extensive authority and responsibility for the company’s operations. The general manager, which is mandatory in public limited companies but optional in private limited companies, is responsible for the daily management under the board's direction. In companies with more than 200 employees, the corporate assembly is also mandatory, with specific decision-making authority in matters concerning investments and rationalizations. The interaction between these bodies is closely regulated by company law to ensure efficient management and the safeguarding of both ownership interests, employees' rights, and creditor protection.

The company’s organization and authority: Structuring decision-making powers and external representation

Corporate Law

Apr 8, 2025

Corporate Bodies in Limited Companies – Roles, Responsibilities, and Authority

Private limited companies and public limited companies are organized through a hierarchy of corporate bodies with defined roles and responsibilities. The general meeting is the company’s supreme body, where shareholders exercise their authority through majority resolutions. The board of directors manages the company’s general administration and represents the company externally, with extensive authority and responsibility for the company’s operations. The general manager, which is mandatory in public limited companies but optional in private limited companies, is responsible for the daily management under the board's direction. In companies with more than 200 employees, the corporate assembly is also mandatory, with specific decision-making authority in matters concerning investments and rationalizations. The interaction between these bodies is closely regulated by company law to ensure efficient management and the safeguarding of both ownership interests, employees' rights, and creditor protection.

The company's purpose and social responsibility: From shareholder value to sustainability

Corporate Law

Apr 8, 2025

The Purpose and Social Responsibility of Companies – From Shareholder Interests to Sustainability

Corporate law has undergone a paradigm shift from primarily protecting shareholders' interests to recognizing a broader range of protected interests. Traditionally, maximizing shareholder value has been the principal objective of companies, but increasing attention is now being paid to companies' responsibilities towards other stakeholders and society at large. This is reflected in both legislation and court practice, where the Supreme Court has acknowledged that company interests include responsibilities for employees, contractors, creditors, and society. The Accounting Act requires reporting on corporate social responsibility, and corporate governance recommendations emphasize sustainability. The challenge lies in balancing economic efficiency with long-term sustainable development and choosing appropriate regulatory forms to promote these objectives.

The company's purpose and social responsibility: From shareholder value to sustainability

Corporate Law

Apr 8, 2025

The Purpose and Social Responsibility of Companies – From Shareholder Interests to Sustainability

Corporate law has undergone a paradigm shift from primarily protecting shareholders' interests to recognizing a broader range of protected interests. Traditionally, maximizing shareholder value has been the principal objective of companies, but increasing attention is now being paid to companies' responsibilities towards other stakeholders and society at large. This is reflected in both legislation and court practice, where the Supreme Court has acknowledged that company interests include responsibilities for employees, contractors, creditors, and society. The Accounting Act requires reporting on corporate social responsibility, and corporate governance recommendations emphasize sustainability. The challenge lies in balancing economic efficiency with long-term sustainable development and choosing appropriate regulatory forms to promote these objectives.

The company's purpose and social responsibility: From shareholder value to sustainability

Corporate Law

Apr 8, 2025

The Purpose and Social Responsibility of Companies – From Shareholder Interests to Sustainability

Corporate law has undergone a paradigm shift from primarily protecting shareholders' interests to recognizing a broader range of protected interests. Traditionally, maximizing shareholder value has been the principal objective of companies, but increasing attention is now being paid to companies' responsibilities towards other stakeholders and society at large. This is reflected in both legislation and court practice, where the Supreme Court has acknowledged that company interests include responsibilities for employees, contractors, creditors, and society. The Accounting Act requires reporting on corporate social responsibility, and corporate governance recommendations emphasize sustainability. The challenge lies in balancing economic efficiency with long-term sustainable development and choosing appropriate regulatory forms to promote these objectives.

Contact us

Contact Sterk Law Firm for legal assistance and advice. Our dedicated team of experienced lawyers is ready to find tailored solutions for your specific challenges.

Portrait of a man in a suit with arms crossed, in front of a graphic background – expressing professionalism and confidence
Portrait of a man in a suit with arms crossed, in front of a graphic background – expressing professionalism and confidence

By submitting this form, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.