Balancing of Interests in Termination - Balancing the Needs of the Business and the Employee

The weighing of interests constitutes a fundamental safety mechanism in Norwegian labor law in cases of dismissal due to downsizing or rationalization. The Working Environment Act requires employers to conduct a specific assessment of the company's need to terminate an employee against the employee's need to retain their position. This provision entails an important balance between the company's economic interests and the employee's right to protection.

Legal Foundations and Purpose

Historical Background

The weighing of interests was introduced through the Working Environment Act of 1977 to strengthen the employee's position in relation to the company's economic assessments. The provision stipulates that not every rationalization gain will provide legitimate grounds for dismissal.

Function as a Safety Valve

The provision can be viewed as a "safety valve" within the Norwegian dismissal protection. Even if the downsizing and selection are otherwise legitimate, it takes considerable consideration before the weighing of interests can lead to a legitimate dismissal being set aside. If the company has documented and well-reasoned rationalization needs to secure continued operation, this will carry weight even if the dismissals impact one or several employees significantly.

Individual Assessment

Concrete Approach

The weighing of interests must be conducted with regard to the individual employee affected by the dismissal. For most employees, being dismissed is a disadvantage because it is not their choice. They find themselves in a situation where they must actively seek other employment, which for most will be successful, but not for everyone.

The Public Safety Net

The public sector provides a safety net for those who encounter difficulties. In the labor market, NAV is tasked with assisting those who lose their jobs. NAV Act § 4 third paragraph stipulates that the agency shall stimulate benefit recipients to work activity, provide advice to employers and employees to prevent exclusion from working life, assist job seekers in finding employment, and prevent the harmful effects of unemployment.

In addition, NAV administers the unemployment benefit scheme, which offers a financial safety net for employees transitioning from one position to another.

Extraordinary Circumstances

Target Group for the Provision

The weighing of interests in the Working Environment Act § 15-7 second paragraph must be viewed in connection with the public safety net. The ordinary disadvantages of being dismissed are not the target of the provision. The provision is aimed at more extraordinary circumstances.

This may, for example, include a person in crisis with extraordinary caregiving responsibilities, where dismissal would hit especially hard. It may further be an employee of certain age and specialized competence that excludes them from entering other employment, and thus with a reasonable degree of certainty will be excluded from the labor market.

Significant Factors on the Employer's Side

When such circumstances are present, there must exist significant factors on the employer's side before dismissal can be decided. The assessment requires thorough mapping of the individual employee's situation.

Role of the Consultation Meeting

The employer is assisted by the individual consultation meeting that must be conducted with the employee according to the Working Environment Act § 15-1, before a decision on dismissal is made. Special circumstances may emerge in this meeting that make the employee particularly affected by dismissal.

Therefore, it is important to conduct the consultation meeting, even though central information can be gathered through written feedback and more informal meetings as well.

Interaction with Other Suitable Employment

Where other suitable employment has been offered, there is little room for weighing of interests, especially when the offer closely aligns with the employee's original position. In such cases, it takes a lot for the weighing of interests to have decisive significance in favor of the employee.

Company's Situation

On the company's side, an important factor is the severity of the situation. If the company is in a critical financial situation, the weighing of interests is more likely to favor the company. In cases of general downsizing, the company's need to implement these, provided they are legitimately justified, will have substantial weight in relation to the individual's interest in keeping their job.

Case Law

The Gresvig Case

In the Gresvig case, The Supreme Court stated that the employee was 55 years old with 10 years of seniority, but neither age nor seniority could be given significant weight. The employee was offered an alternative job involving significantly lower pay, but the offer still met the requirement of "other suitable employment" when no positions better matched his previous job were available.

The Supreme Court concluded that the weighing of interests could only in extraordinary circumstances favor the employee when downsizing was legitimately justified by the employer's circumstances. Such extraordinary circumstances were clearly not present in the case.

The Posten II Judgement

The Supreme Court further stated in the Posten II judgment that when deciding whether dismissal has legitimate grounds in downsizing or rationalization measures, a weighing of interests between the company's needs and the disadvantages the dismissal imposes on the individual employee should be conducted.

In this weighing of interests, several assessment factors usually play a central role: proposed job offer, employee's age, service time, economic situation, and prospects in the labor market, held up against the company's need to conduct necessary downsizing.

General Premises

The general premise is that "a great deal is required to let the individual employee's interests be decisive when the rationalization measure in question has large dimensions and involves several employees." The room for weighing of interests is also smaller in cases where other suitable work has been offered.

Relation to Collective Agreements

The Law's Primacy

The obligation to conduct individual weighing of interests follows directly from the law. This means that this obligation outweighs, for example, collective agreements that solely consider seniority and not individual circumstances in selection for dismissal. If the company solely considers seniority, it will be in violation of the obligation to conduct weighing of interests.

Interpretation of Collective Agreements

Normally, all collective agreements with seniority clauses must be interpreted in light of the Working Environment Act § 15-7 second paragraph, so that weighing of interests is also included. It still has rather little emphasis where the management and the elected representatives agree on the setup for downsizing and selection for redundancy.

Co-determination and Predictability

Predictability and co-determination in downsizing argue for giving great weight to collective agreements. This creates a balance between individual protection and collective participation in downsizing processes.

Practical Recommendations

Companies should establish systematic routines to map individual circumstances that may impact the weighing of interests. This includes thorough consultation meetings where the employee's personal circumstances, financial situation, and labor market prospects are assessed concretely.

Documentation of the weighing of interests should be thorough and individualized for each affected employee. Standardized assessments will not meet the law’s requirements for specific assessment.

Particular attention should be paid to employees in vulnerable situations - older employees with specialized competence, individuals with extraordinary caregiving needs, or other circumstances that can make dismissal particularly burdensome.