Apr 8, 2025

Working Hours under the Working Environment Act – Rules, Exceptions, and Practical Application

Working Time Regulations in Norwegian Employment Law: Legislation, Exceptions, and Practical Application
Working Time Regulations in Norwegian Employment Law: Legislation, Exceptions, and Practical Application
Working Time Regulations in Norwegian Employment Law: Legislation, Exceptions, and Practical Application

The working time regulations constitute a central part of Norwegian labor law and have both historical grounding and modern relevance. The regulations aim to balance various considerations: the employee's health and welfare, the employer's need for flexibility and efficient operations, as well as the society's interests related to employment and equality. This article provides an overview of the most important rules on working time in the Working Environment Act, with an emphasis on practical application and interpretation.

Historical Development and Purpose of Working Time Regulation

The idea of an eight-hour workday emerged early in the 19th century and became a significant cause for the labor movement from the 1880s. In Norway, working hours for adult male workers were first regulated by the Workers' Protection Act of 1915, which set the normal workday at ten hours per day and 54 hours per week. The eight-hour day was adopted into collective agreements in 1918 and became law the following year.

Over the years, weekly working hours have been gradually reduced; to 45 hours in 1958, 42.5 hours in 1972, and 40 hours in 1976. In 1986, a 37.5-hour workweek was established by collective agreements, but legislation has not followed this, and the Working Environment Act still operates with a standard 40-hour workweek.

The main purpose of the working time regulations is to ensure that employees have working hours that do not impose undue health and social burdens on them or their immediate family. At the same time, the rules must be adapted to the employer's need for access to the workforce when the business requires it.

The Reasonableness Requirement - A Fundamental Limitation

Regardless of other rules, there is an immutable requirement that the working time arrangement in the enterprise must be reasonable. According to the Working Environment Act § 10-2(1), the working time arrangement must be such that employees are not exposed to adverse physical or psychological burdens, and that it is possible to take safety considerations into account.

This reasonableness requirement:

  • Is peremptory and cannot be waived by agreement

  • Acts as an independent limitation on how the enterprise's working time arrangement can be practiced

  • Applies to all employees, including those with managerial or particularly independent positions

  • Imposes an obligation on the employer to identify and assess risks associated with working time arrangements

The Concept of Working Time

The Working Environment Act defines working time as "the time during which the employee is at the disposal of the employer" (§ 10-1(1)). This definition must be interpreted in accordance with the EU's Working Time Directive, where working time is defined as "any period during which the employee is working, at the employer's disposal, and carrying out their activities or duties".

Working time is opposed to "non-working time," which is "the time during which the employee is not at the disposal of the employer" (§ 10-1(2)). The two concepts are mutually exclusive and must be interpreted in accordance with the directive's purpose of protecting the health and safety of employees.

The European Court of Justice has established that working time is characterized by three elements:

  1. The employee must perform their activities or duties within the framework of their employment relationship

  2. During the time available to the employer

  3. Work

A practical question is whether travel time is working time. In the Thue case (HR-2018-1036-A), the Supreme Court, based on an advisory opinion from the EFTA Court, stated that necessary travel time outside regular working hours to and from a location other than the fixed workplace, where the employee is to perform tasks as specified by the employer, constitutes working time.

The General Working Time

Main Rule and Exceptions

The main rule is that the general working hours shall not exceed nine hours in 24 hours and 40 hours in seven days (§ 10-4(1)). However, there are exceptions allowing for longer working hours in various situations:

Work of a Passive Nature:

  • Working hours can be extended by up to half of the passive periods

  • Maximum two hours in 24 hours and ten hours in seven days

  • For "particularly passive" work, the Labor Inspectorate may consent to further extensions

On-call Duty:

  • In the case of on-call duty outside the workplace, working hours can be converted using a factor of 1/7

  • The conversion factor is determined by how demanding the on-call duty arrangement is

  • In enterprises bound by collective agreements, exceptions to the conversion factor can be agreed upon

Burdensome Working Time Arrangements:

  • For continuous shift work and comparable rotational work, a general workweek of 38 hours is applicable

  • The same working hours apply to work on two shifts regularly conducted on Sundays and holidays

  • Also where the employee has to work at least every third Sunday, or mainly at night

Particularly Burdensome Working Time Arrangements:

  • For continuous shift work and comparable rotational work, a general workweek of 36 hours is applicable

  • The same working hours apply to work underground in mines, tunneling, and excavation of rock chambers underground

Right to Flexible and Reduced Working Hours

The Working Environment Act provides employees certain rights to adapt their working hours:

Flexible Working Hours (§ 10-2(3)):

  • Employees have the right to flexible working hours if this can be implemented without significant inconvenience to the business

  • Employees do not need to cite specific reasons or justifications

  • There must be a qualified predominance of interest in favor of the employer to deny flexible working hours

Reduced Working Hours (§ 10-2(4)):

  • Employees who have reached the age of 62 or who for health, social, or other important welfare reasons require it, have the right to reduced working hours

  • Provided that the reduction in working hours can be implemented without significant inconvenience to the business

  • Parents with children under ten years are considered to have a need for reduced working hours if they request it

Average Calculation of Working Time

To ensure flexibility, the Working Environment Act § 10-5 allows for working hours to be averaged over a period:

By Agreement Between Employer and Employee:

  • Averaging over a period of 52 weeks

  • The general working hours shall not exceed ten hours in 24 hours and 48 hours in seven days

  • The limit of 48 hours can be averaged over eight weeks, but must not exceed 50 hours in any single week

By Agreement Between Employer and Elected Representatives:

  • In tariff bound enterprises, higher limits can be agreed upon

  • Up to 12.5 hours in 24 hours and 48 hours in seven days

  • The general working hours shall not exceed 54 hours in any single week

With Consent from the Labor Inspectorate:

  • Averaging over a period of 26 weeks

  • Limit for total working time of 13 hours in 24 hours and 48 hours in seven days

Overtime

Overtime work is work beyond the general working time according to the Working Environment Act. This differs from additional work, which is work beyond agreed (but within legal) working hours.

Conditions for Overtime (§ 10-6):

  • There must be a particular and time-limited need

  • The employer shall, if possible, discuss the necessity with elected representatives before overtime is initiated

  • The employee has the right to be exempted for health or significant social reasons

Duration of Overtime Work:

  • The main rule is a maximum of ten hours in seven days, 25 hours in four consecutive weeks, and 200 hours within a period of 52 weeks

  • By agreement with elected representatives, this can be extended to 20 hours in seven days, 50 hours in four weeks, and 300 hours in 52 weeks

  • Total working time (general + overtime) must not exceed 13 hours in 24 hours or 48 hours in seven days

Overtime Payment:

  • The employer is obliged to pay at least a 40 percent premium for overtime work

  • Overtime work must be conducted in agreement with the employer

  • The employer and employee can agree that overtime hours are taken entirely or partially as compensatory time off

Breaks and Non-Working Periods

Breaks (§ 10-9):

  • In daily working hours over 5.5 hours, employees are entitled to breaks

  • With at least eight hours of working time, breaks shall constitute at least half an hour

  • Breaks are normally not counted as working time but shall be counted as working time if the employee cannot freely leave the workplace

Daily and Weekly Rest (§ 10-8):

  • Employees shall have at least eleven consecutive hours of rest in 24 hours

  • In seven days, the employee shall have at least 35 consecutive hours of rest

  • The weekly rest period should, as far as possible, include Sunday

Sunday and Night Work

Sunday Work (§ 10-10):

  • The starting point is rest on Sundays and public holidays

  • Permitted only when the nature of the work makes it necessary

  • In enterprises bound by collective agreements, Sunday work can be agreed upon for special and time-limited needs

Night Work (§ 10-11):

  • Night work (between 9:00 pm and 6:00 am) is, as a general rule, prohibited

  • Permitted only when the nature of the work makes it necessary

  • Employees primarily performing night work shall be offered a health check

Exceptions to the Working Time Regulations

The Working Environment Act allows for several exceptions to the working time regulations:

Employees in Leading or Particularly Independent Positions (§ 10-12(1)(2)):

  • Exempt from most working time regulations

  • "Leading position" encompasses employees with clear management functions, greater responsibility, or independent decision-making authority

  • "Particularly independent position" requires great independence concerning work performance and working time

Rescue Work (§ 10-12(3)):

  • The rules can be deviated from for work that must be undertaken to avert danger to life or property

  • Employees shall be provided with compensatory rest periods

Collective Agreement with a Union with a Right to Recommend (§ 10-12(4)):

  • Unions with at least 10,000 members can enter into a collective agreement that deviates from most working time rules

  • In exceptions from rest and night work rules, employees must be given compensatory rest

Conclusion

The working time regulations in the Working Environment Act constitute a complex system designed to accommodate several conflicting considerations. While the main rules set clear limits on working hours, exception provisions allow for flexibility where the needs of the enterprise or the nature of the work dictate. The non-negotiable requirement for a reasonable working time arrangement nevertheless forms an absolute constraint on the employer's room for maneuver.

Sterk Law Firm

Your Partner for a Well-Functioning Workplace

Your Partner for a Well-Functioning Workplace

Your Partner for a Well-Functioning Workplace

Employment law challenges can be complex and time-consuming, whether you are a business leader or an employee. The consequences of incorrect handling can be significant, both in human and economic terms. Our lawyers have extensive experience from various aspects of working life and broad expertise in all areas of employment law. We can therefore offer precise advice and support throughout the process, allowing you to focus on your core business.

Employment law challenges can be complex and time-consuming, whether you are a business leader or an employee. The consequences of incorrect handling can be significant, both in human and economic terms. Our lawyers have extensive experience from various aspects of working life and broad expertise in all areas of employment law. We can therefore offer precise advice and support throughout the process, allowing you to focus on your core business.

Employment law challenges can be complex and time-consuming, whether you are a business leader or an employee. The consequences of incorrect handling can be significant, both in human and economic terms. Our lawyers have extensive experience from various aspects of working life and broad expertise in all areas of employment law. We can therefore offer precise advice and support throughout the process, allowing you to focus on your core business.

Advokatfirmaet Sterk
Advokatfirmaet Sterk
Advokatfirmaet Sterk

Comprehensive Employment Law Assistance

Comprehensive Employment Law Assistance

Comprehensive Employment Law Assistance

Explore

More articles

Disputes Regarding Termination - Rights and Process

Employment Law

Sep 16, 2025

Disputes Regarding the Legality of Dismissal - Employees' Rights and Employers' Risks During Downsizing

Disputes regarding the legality of dismissals provide employees with extensive rights that can result in significant costs for employers. The right to remain employed while the dispute is ongoing entails continued salary payments for months or years. Employees can demand negotiations within two weeks, and lawsuits must be filed within eight weeks. Employers may request resignation due to unreasonable circumstances, but the threshold is high for dismissals related to the company's circumstances. Unjust dismissals result in invalidity and compensation. The right of priority applies for one year after dismissal. Thorough case management and evaluation of severance packages can reduce the risk of disputes.

Disputes Regarding Termination - Rights and Process

Employment Law

Sep 16, 2025

Disputes Regarding the Legality of Dismissal - Employees' Rights and Employers' Risks During Downsizing

Disputes regarding the legality of dismissals provide employees with extensive rights that can result in significant costs for employers. The right to remain employed while the dispute is ongoing entails continued salary payments for months or years. Employees can demand negotiations within two weeks, and lawsuits must be filed within eight weeks. Employers may request resignation due to unreasonable circumstances, but the threshold is high for dismissals related to the company's circumstances. Unjust dismissals result in invalidity and compensation. The right of priority applies for one year after dismissal. Thorough case management and evaluation of severance packages can reduce the risk of disputes.

Disputes Regarding Termination - Rights and Process

Employment Law

Sep 16, 2025

Disputes Regarding the Legality of Dismissal - Employees' Rights and Employers' Risks During Downsizing

Disputes regarding the legality of dismissals provide employees with extensive rights that can result in significant costs for employers. The right to remain employed while the dispute is ongoing entails continued salary payments for months or years. Employees can demand negotiations within two weeks, and lawsuits must be filed within eight weeks. Employers may request resignation due to unreasonable circumstances, but the threshold is high for dismissals related to the company's circumstances. Unjust dismissals result in invalidity and compensation. The right of priority applies for one year after dismissal. Thorough case management and evaluation of severance packages can reduce the risk of disputes.

Case Handling in Downsizing - Comprehensive Guide

Employment Law

Sep 16, 2025

Case Management for Downsizing - Comprehensive Guidance and Process Guide for Businesses

Proper case handling during downsizing requires a systematic approach with documentation of the need for change, early discussions with union representatives, board endorsement, and individual meetings with affected employees. Mass layoffs trigger specific notification requirements to NAV. Procedural errors can result in invalid terminations and liability for damages. Termination letters must meet strict formal requirements and be delivered correctly. Thorough planning, involvement of union representatives, and legal advice are essential for a responsible execution. An extensive checklist ensures compliance with all requirements.

Case Handling in Downsizing - Comprehensive Guide

Employment Law

Sep 16, 2025

Case Management for Downsizing - Comprehensive Guidance and Process Guide for Businesses

Proper case handling during downsizing requires a systematic approach with documentation of the need for change, early discussions with union representatives, board endorsement, and individual meetings with affected employees. Mass layoffs trigger specific notification requirements to NAV. Procedural errors can result in invalid terminations and liability for damages. Termination letters must meet strict formal requirements and be delivered correctly. Thorough planning, involvement of union representatives, and legal advice are essential for a responsible execution. An extensive checklist ensures compliance with all requirements.

Case Handling in Downsizing - Comprehensive Guide

Employment Law

Sep 16, 2025

Case Management for Downsizing - Comprehensive Guidance and Process Guide for Businesses

Proper case handling during downsizing requires a systematic approach with documentation of the need for change, early discussions with union representatives, board endorsement, and individual meetings with affected employees. Mass layoffs trigger specific notification requirements to NAV. Procedural errors can result in invalid terminations and liability for damages. Termination letters must meet strict formal requirements and be delivered correctly. Thorough planning, involvement of union representatives, and legal advice are essential for a responsible execution. An extensive checklist ensures compliance with all requirements.

Reassignment and Termination of Employment - Legal Frameworks

Employment Law

Sep 16, 2025

Reassignment and Modification Termination - Alternatives to Dismissal during Organizational Changes

Reassignment and termination due to changes are important alternatives to regular termination during restructuring. Changes within the "essential nature" of the position can be implemented under management authority, while substantial changes require termination due to changes. The threshold for termination due to changes is lower than that for regular termination. Procedural requirements must be followed, including consultation meetings. This is particularly relevant for older employees with long seniority. Information, consultation, and involvement of union representatives are central to an appropriate process.

Reassignment and Termination of Employment - Legal Frameworks

Employment Law

Sep 16, 2025

Reassignment and Modification Termination - Alternatives to Dismissal during Organizational Changes

Reassignment and termination due to changes are important alternatives to regular termination during restructuring. Changes within the "essential nature" of the position can be implemented under management authority, while substantial changes require termination due to changes. The threshold for termination due to changes is lower than that for regular termination. Procedural requirements must be followed, including consultation meetings. This is particularly relevant for older employees with long seniority. Information, consultation, and involvement of union representatives are central to an appropriate process.

Reassignment and Termination of Employment - Legal Frameworks

Employment Law

Sep 16, 2025

Reassignment and Modification Termination - Alternatives to Dismissal during Organizational Changes

Reassignment and termination due to changes are important alternatives to regular termination during restructuring. Changes within the "essential nature" of the position can be implemented under management authority, while substantial changes require termination due to changes. The threshold for termination due to changes is lower than that for regular termination. Procedural requirements must be followed, including consultation meetings. This is particularly relevant for older employees with long seniority. Information, consultation, and involvement of union representatives are central to an appropriate process.

Balancing of Interests in Termination - Legal Framework

Employment Law

Sep 16, 2025

Balancing of Interests in Termination - Balancing the Needs of the Business and the Employee

The weighing of interests when it comes to termination requires a concrete balancing between the needs of the business and the individual situation of the employee. The provision functions as a safety valve and aims at extraordinary circumstances beyond normal inconveniences associated with termination. NAV's role as a safety net is included in the assessment. The Supreme Court's practice shows that it takes a lot for the balancing of interests to be decisive when downsizing is justified, especially when other suitable employment is offered. The obligation takes precedence over collective agreements concerning mere seniority.

Balancing of Interests in Termination - Legal Framework

Employment Law

Sep 16, 2025

Balancing of Interests in Termination - Balancing the Needs of the Business and the Employee

The weighing of interests when it comes to termination requires a concrete balancing between the needs of the business and the individual situation of the employee. The provision functions as a safety valve and aims at extraordinary circumstances beyond normal inconveniences associated with termination. NAV's role as a safety net is included in the assessment. The Supreme Court's practice shows that it takes a lot for the balancing of interests to be decisive when downsizing is justified, especially when other suitable employment is offered. The obligation takes precedence over collective agreements concerning mere seniority.

Balancing of Interests in Termination - Legal Framework

Employment Law

Sep 16, 2025

Balancing of Interests in Termination - Balancing the Needs of the Business and the Employee

The weighing of interests when it comes to termination requires a concrete balancing between the needs of the business and the individual situation of the employee. The provision functions as a safety valve and aims at extraordinary circumstances beyond normal inconveniences associated with termination. NAV's role as a safety net is included in the assessment. The Supreme Court's practice shows that it takes a lot for the balancing of interests to be decisive when downsizing is justified, especially when other suitable employment is offered. The obligation takes precedence over collective agreements concerning mere seniority.

Contact us

Contact Sterk Law Firm for legal assistance and advice. Our dedicated team of experienced lawyers is ready to find tailored solutions for your specific challenges.

Portrett av mann i dress med armene i kors, foran grafisk bakgrunn – uttrykker profesjonalitet og selvsikkerhet
Portrett av mann i dress med armene i kors, foran grafisk bakgrunn – uttrykker profesjonalitet og selvsikkerhet

By submitting this form, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.